Didn't even notice him out there, usually thats a positive sign for a D-manNever out of place once, from what I could tell.
Didn't even notice him out there, usually thats a positive sign for a D-manNever out of place once, from what I could tell.
We only had 6 NHL dmen after the Dumoulin trade. Kylington will be our #7/injury replacement for the rest of the season.Why does Anaheim do this?
Can someone explain what the point of all this is?
Did the Isles just take Kylington for cap purposes?
But now he gets to hang on the beach instead of freeze his ass off in a cow town.Kylington being shipped around. Shoulda signed that 2 year Calgary offer buddy
I feel dumb asking this but are any of the “future considerations” ever paid? Feels like a loophole to trade a player and get nothing back. I wonder when the first future considerations trade was made? Probably right after the era of guys being traded for money?
Only 6 D on the roster, and don’t want to call up Luneau and then be sitting one of Luneau, Zellweger,or Mintyukov every night. This is a feee 7D.Why does Anaheim do this?
Yea, imagine getting a legit top 4 d-man, when you could've had a waiver fodder guy instead. Oh the horrorImagine...Edmonton could have gotten Kylington for nothing, but instead will get Walman
That he finally gets a spot and isn't rotating in and out of the lineup. This is purely for the press box and have a guy there in case someone can't play play minute.What does this mean for Zellweger?
The Ducks have basically no defensemen under contract for the AHL, and after moving Dumoulin out, they would be either running only 6D on the roster or having a high potential kid sitting in the press box instead of playing AHL games and developing.Can someone explain what the point of all this is?
Did the Isles just take Kylington for cap purposes?
I wonder if any GM was ever like “remember those future considerations from that trade 10 years ago?…” during the late rounds of the draft lolPretty sure it’s just legalese for free, and it’s kinda hilarious. “Future considerations” just means “hey bud, we’ll think of ya, and if a future trade comes up, you know what that means? We will consider it. That’s right, that one doesn’t immediately get balled up and tossed 3 feet wide of the trash can.”
NHL should insist on changing it to “another deal in the next 5 years” just for laughs.
Maybe a contract count thing? This keeps them at 48 of 50 slots.
He could also have been the main piece coming back in the Nelson trade from Lou's perspective, but suddenly Anaheim jumps into the mix and gives him an offer he couldn't refuse.Clearly Lou never wanted this bloke in the first place.
Isles needed the veteran presence that future considerations brings to the locker roomCan someone explain what the point of all this is?
Did the Isles just take Kylington for cap purposes?
These days, that's a good flight.Just imagining the plane banking hard to the right when the news came in. Bags and people thrown across the cabin
Can’t see him replacing Dumo. More likely he’s here to be 7th D in case of injuries. We can’t keep scratching Zell or Minty.There's your Dumoulin replacement for the rest of the year. Not a bad little move for Anaheim. There was a moment not that long ago where Kylington was playing at a borderline-2nd pair level and he is still only 27.
Isles needed the veteran presence that future considerations brings to the locker room
Am I the only one who thinks you shouldn't be allowed to trade nothing?
If you want to make a deal, trade a 2028 7th rounder or something.
soooo...there is a difference between those two signings? statistically what kind of impact do 7th rounders have on...idk winning the cup?
1997 7th rounders become head coaches who lead the McDrais to almost winning a cup. Thats about as close as they get.soooo...there is a difference between those two signings? statistically what kind of impact do 7th rounders have on...idk winning the cup?