Confirmed Trade: [ANA/NYI] Oliver Kylington for future considerations

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
I feel dumb asking this but are any of the “future considerations” ever paid? Feels like a loophole to trade a player and get nothing back. I wonder when the first future considerations trade was made? Probably right after the era of guys being traded for money?

Pretty sure it’s just legalese for free, and it’s kinda hilarious. “Future considerations” just means “hey bud, we’ll think of ya, and if a future trade comes up, you know what that means? We will consider it. That’s right, that one doesn’t immediately get balled up and tossed 3 feet wide of the trash can.”

NHL should insist on changing it to “another deal in the next 5 years” just for laughs.
 
Can someone explain what the point of all this is?

Did the Isles just take Kylington for cap purposes?
The Ducks have basically no defensemen under contract for the AHL, and after moving Dumoulin out, they would be either running only 6D on the roster or having a high potential kid sitting in the press box instead of playing AHL games and developing.

Kylington is an expiring contract D who can sit in the press box as the 7D, and then whichever kid is the #8D (probably Luneau?) can go down to the AHL and play every game and develop. If the team wants to actually play Kylington a little bit and healthy scratch a kid once in a while, that's also an option.

Yes, the Isles just took Kylington for cap purposes (and possibly also 50 contract limit purposes).
 
Pretty sure it’s just legalese for free, and it’s kinda hilarious. “Future considerations” just means “hey bud, we’ll think of ya, and if a future trade comes up, you know what that means? We will consider it. That’s right, that one doesn’t immediately get balled up and tossed 3 feet wide of the trash can.”

NHL should insist on changing it to “another deal in the next 5 years” just for laughs.
I wonder if any GM was ever like “remember those future considerations from that trade 10 years ago?…” during the late rounds of the draft lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Still not sure why he didn’t just sign with the Flames. They had no depth at the time and he would have had top-4 minutes for sure. Although given his play this season, I’m not sure he would have stuck in a top-4 role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forsbergaura21
Who is who?
Oduya vs. Kylington!
IMG_3497.png
IMG_3498.png
 
There's your Dumoulin replacement for the rest of the year. Not a bad little move for Anaheim. There was a moment not that long ago where Kylington was playing at a borderline-2nd pair level and he is still only 27.
Can’t see him replacing Dumo. More likely he’s here to be 7th D in case of injuries. We can’t keep scratching Zell or Minty.
 
Am I the only one who thinks you shouldn't be allowed to trade nothing?

If you want to make a deal, trade a 2028 7th rounder or something.
 
Am I the only one who thinks you shouldn't be allowed to trade nothing?

If you want to make a deal, trade a 2028 7th rounder or something.

soooo...there is a difference between those two signings? statistically what kind of impact do 7th rounders have on...idk winning the cup?
 
soooo...there is a difference between those two signings? statistically what kind of impact do 7th rounders have on...idk winning the cup?
1997 7th rounders become head coaches who lead the McDrais to almost winning a cup. Thats about as close as they get.
 

Ad

Ad