HandsomeHollywood
Brooke Shields ain't got nothin'
- Mar 20, 2017
- 1,531
- 1,219
My plan is to likely split Bryan and Guerrero. They sort of fulfil the same roles but I really like the versatility and that they can carry their own matches. Most of the time I've split my first two picks into different matches. I don't recall Bryan and Guerrero being matched up before (there likely wasn't an angle behind it or I'd remember) but I do prefer to go with something totally new.
Jericho always seems to go too late for whatever reason. As an overall package he should probably go in the top 10 every time.
qpq did that matchup a few years back. Not sure the background though. Either way they’re a great start to a roster.
Jericho is my favorite of all time so I’m biased but he should definitely go top ten if you ask me. He has one drawback but @Megahab doesn’t have to worry about that.
I did not see E&C going as a team pick that's a big stance to take.
I like the Rhodes pick. I happily would have taken him with one of my next two picks as I had a plan I've wanted to do with him for years.
I picked Dusty two years ago and made in my mind am amazing match. Or at least the mic work heading into the match would have been must see tv. Not going to spoil it though. Love Dusty
We all have to remember, in all fairness to everyone, to think of these guys at the height of the primes or most successful points. Like for me i had Andre vs Taker a few years ago and I'm pretty sure everyone saw that as 1990 Andre vs 2017 Taker instead of 1970s Andre vs like 1996 Taker...Probably not everyone's favorite pick, but Sting is useful considering he didn't go to the WWE until very late and then didn't have a lot of opponents. Gives you a lot of matchup options, though the one I was looking to do can't happen...
We all have to remember, in all fairness to everyone, to think of these guys at the height of the primes or most successful points. Like for me i had Andre vs Taker a few years ago and I'm pretty sure everyone saw that as 1990 Andre vs 2017 Taker instead of 1970s Andre vs like 1996 Taker...
Andre was a good in-ring worker until his body started to fail mid-80's. Most remember him exclusively as a WWF talent but his best work was in other territories and I would rank his work with Stan Hansen in Japan as his best. This blows WMIII out of the water.We all have to remember, in all fairness to everyone, to think of these guys at the height of the primes or most successful points. Like for me i had Andre vs Taker a few years ago and I'm pretty sure everyone saw that as 1990 Andre vs 2017 Taker instead of 1970s Andre vs like 1996 Taker...
We all have to remember, in all fairness to everyone, to think of these guys at the height of the primes or most successful points. Like for me i had Andre vs Taker a few years ago and I'm pretty sure everyone saw that as 1990 Andre vs 2017 Taker instead of 1970s Andre vs like 1996 Taker...
I was curious how high Cody would go, pretty close to what I figured
I think the majority of us wing it. I took Sasha early quite frankly to make it easier for me to get a hold of matches and play in my end of the draft.I feel like I am winging it right now. So far the wrestlers who I really want are getting picked just before my turn. I went with best value in my first two picks. (Flair and Lesnar)
I was really wanting Andre the Giant who was just picked. I know that it wouldn’t be the greatest technical match but it sure would be been a spectacle between Brock and Andre.