OT: - All Time Fantasy Discussion Thread | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

OT: All Time Fantasy Discussion Thread

Although, my Nono always tells me that the teams were more talented back then because it was harder to make the NHL, with fewer roster spots.
I mean to make an even remotely accurate era relative comparison that didn't immediately skew towards the modern era, given the overall evolution and advancements of humans in that time, you'd have to take SOOOO many factors into consideration. Which goes to show you, you gotta evaluate players in their own context (or completely ignore most of history like me).
 
I mean to make an even remotely accurate era relative comparison that didn't immediately skew towards the modern era, given the overall evolution and advancements of humans in that time, you'd have to take SOOOO many factors into consideration. Which goes to show you, you gotta evaluate players in their own context (or completely ignore most of history like me).

So far, I’ve only picked players from the 70’s on, but I’m sure that will eventually change.

On a side note, I know exactly why you picked Blake and when everyone starts building their defence they’ll find out why.
 
So far, I’ve only picked players from the 70’s on, but I’m sure that will eventually change.

On a side note, I know exactly why you picked Blake and when everyone starts building their defence they’ll find out why.
Shh. :D

I think some leniency will be necessary again.
 
You meant to draft Richard Park, right? Can we have that corrected? Oh man, I can't believe he's already off the board. Oh well, you win some, you lose some. That's Richard Park to @The Abusement Park.
All the guys I’ve picked I’m surprised haven’t been picked in the 1st round honestly. Maybe Park would’ve gone early 2nd but still.
 
You meant to draft Richard Park, right? Can we have that corrected? Oh man, I can't believe he's already off the board. Oh well, you win some, you lose some. That's Richard Park to @The Abusement Park.
I just envision you popping up (like in your profile pic) from behind the counter at a bowling alley saying into the loudspeaker, “That’s Richard Park to The Abusement Park....again Richard Park, your party is waiting for you in lane 3”.
 
I just envision you popping up (like in your profile pic) from behind the counter at a bowling alley saying into the loudspeaker, “That’s Richard Park to The Abusement Park....again Richard Park, your party is waiting for you in lane 3”.
8460541.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gatorbait19 and OB5
I should have taken him instead of Sundin. I wanted him more, but I wanted a big 2C behind Stastny and after Lindros went I felt the walls were closing in on Mats.

Should have just taken the higher rate guy.

Well you’ve got a hell of a one-two punch down the middle now.

I always felt Sundin did really well in Toronto considering he didn’t have an elite team around him. His legacy would of been greater had a stayed inside the Avs organization.
 
Someone take Ron Francis so I don’t have to take him with my next pick because I have something planned and if he’s there I’ll have to take him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad