You take Patrick, get it wrong and move on. It sucks but everyone was wrong and you played the odds. Better that than being wrong betting on the low percentage. Because that way you’ll be wrong more often.
You act like there's a massive difference in the odds between the picks you're talking about. There's not. That's just not how it works. They are all low percentage after a certain point.
You know this is how cheap organizations run and it does not result in things. Like, relying on non-staffed scouts opinions as if they are the ultimate judgers, is not some slam dunk like you're acting. It's really putting this assumption on, these are the consensus right picks... based on a bad premise.
If Lev/Demidov becomes a Makar/Patrick, I’ll be the happiest. But until proven otherwise, I am expecting
Maybe, maybe not. We’ll see but unfortunately I think most people would put their money on Demidov having the better career. I really hope most people are wrong and don’t think I’ll be rooting for Demidov to prove my point. I’ll be the happiest if Levshunov comes out on top.
I’m not saying that they should follow the mass and make their decisions based upon that. What I’m saying is that from an external point of view, it worries me that their evaluation differs from what the majority of the experts see.
Our prospects have had a ton of success. In College, In WJC as you say, in their leagues like Kantserov. The only losers we have are on the NHL roster.
