because he doesn’t care, unlike what seems like everyone else.
Kurt is the poster boy for people who want to fight on the internet about it. It’s not wrong that people exist who do hold it as gospel, for a while it became a good way for talent and promotions to get buzz, or in some cases recommend matches independent of its placement on the show.
Cornette and Weasel Dooley of course. It does crack me up that Cornette (and Weasel I guess) did "break the scale" before Meltzer ever did. It was definitely a Lawler Funk match as you say. Also amuses me that Cornette (or anyone else) has a long lost friend named "Weasel Dooley".
Since Sami is now a face this just doesn't make sense.......not that any kind of angle featuring Johnny Knoxville would actually make sense.
STOP WORKING YOURSELF INTO A SHOOT YOU CAN'T WORK YOURSELF OUT OF.
Ah, it’s making sense now. If it’s not supposed to matter or be invalidated, people wouldn’t be spending so much time insisting on nail him for something he’s not putting as much thought into as they think.
Because he spends a lot of time defending his dumb ratings with dumb arguments? The "oh, if I gave it 4,5 and you gave it 5, we basically agree" is just a dumb cop out to justify him breaking his own scale for marketing reasons.
Does he spend a lot of time defending it? He did like a 50-minute podcast with Van Vliet, they didn’t spend the whole time talking about star ratings, I’d imagine the only people who talk to him about it are those who he’s never had a working professional relationship with. I was listening to his shows when he was breaking the scale and it only ever came up as a response to people getting mad and him insisting he doesn’t care. Although he was sought out by guys like Steve Austin to do a podcast after the WK11 to talk about the match specifically to talk about that one because he went to 6.
No, you were, you just fell for the bit.The defense: "It's not Dave's fault he's just half-assing this stuff".
Yeah. You're arguing just to argue at this point.
