I'm okay with trading Kessel. I'm not okay with trading him for the sake of trading him. They need to get a real good blue chip asset back. If not, don't trade him. That's my opinion.
I'm okay with trading Kessel. I'm not okay with trading him for the sake of trading him. They need to get a real good blue chip asset back. If not, don't trade him. That's my opinion.
Like it or not there has to be some sort of timeline on moving Kessel. If **** continues to hit the fan next season and he's still here, you can't continue to sit on your hands.
Obviously there has to be a good return but ultimately it's not up to you, I, or the Leafs to decide what another team will offer up. The market will decide that.
I'd realistically expect roster player, a high end prospect, and a draft pick.
and probably a cap dump as well.
The benefit could be getting a better player in return. Which is a very realistic outcome if they don't settle for the best offer this summer
Or they could miss out on the best off they are going to get for him.
Your benefit is a 50/50 shot at being a negative.
If they act desperate, they will be taken advantage of.
And GM's set the price on their players ALL THE TIME. I've heard plenty of times GM's didn't get what they wanted so their was no deal. Hear it every TDL. So your analogy doesn't apply, Bob. Because they don't HAVE to.
What is the absolute worst offer you would take for Kessel this summer?
I'd assume he'd give Kessel away for free. Or a cap dump
Based on the last 2 games, I am liking how Dion is playing out the string more than Phil is. These last 17 games are going to be a test of one's professionalism and pride. These games will matter IMO of who we keep. If I am a betting man, one of Dion or Phil will be traded this summer. How they play the string out could have a bearing on which player is deemed more expendable.
Dion looks a little more energized than normal. I guess the layoff was good for him, though you do have to wonder why he doesn't prepare himself to play those hard minutes if he knows that's his job profile.
Phil just continues to be the wrong stuff.
Ron Wilson when asked point blank on TSN trade deadline day, who would he rather keep on his team if one of Dion or Phil was traded, he answered Dion. For reasons we have all heard, he cares, he shows up more, and he is not as bad a leader as people make him out to be. Is he Clark or Sundin, no. But he's the best of what we got right now.
Taking account likely returns and the difference in roles they can play in insulating a rebuild I'd say Dion is definitely the guy to keep.
Taking account likely returns and the difference in roles they can play in insulating a rebuild I'd say Dion is definitely the guy to keep.
I would not argue this. Phil is a talent, he can produce. Though since Carlyle has left not so much. But he has so many flaws that are hard to ignore. Dion has shown me something the past 2 games. He could have folded the tent and coasted the rest of the year, but instead he has chosen to play rather hard. That does count for something.
But if we keep him what do we do with the C? Media treats him bad enough as it is.
What is the absolute worst offer you would take for Kessel this summer?
Kessel may be a top 10 NHL player statistically but there's a bunch more that I'd take over him off the top of my head.
Crosby
Ovi
Malkin
Stamkos
Toews
Kane
Kopitar
...
I was wrong.
Edit:doughty, weber.
I think Jones would fit amazingly next to rielly. Instead of trading Kessel (which obviously doesn't work) how about:
NSH
Jones
Toronto
4# overall+?
NSH gets a potential 1# center which you almost only get from Draft and we build our blueline first. How much would the + be?