John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 385,243
- 30,641
The single most entertaining football that I saw, was this year's women's world cup. The Ladies game is about flow and ball possession. It does not have the power component. As a result, the ball does not get kicked from one end of the pitch to the other, but gets passed from one player to the other. It makes the game so much more exciting and much more watchable. The men's game would have to be played on a pitch 200 x 100 to simulate it.
Now grant it, the world cup was a collection of the best. Ladies club football may be less entertaining. But, I will never forget this summers tournament. I struggled to watch the men's game in the immediate period afterwards.
On a similar note
Good to see women's soccer is starting to take off in England. The existence of the FAWSL is only good for the game.
Yeah, sort of a perfect storm with the men on international break.It's good, but we will see the reality later on when the attendances aren't based on the combination of hype and free tickets. Hopefully what is left can still be sustainable.
Not sure where this one goes, but I'll put it here. Holy ****.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/iran/story/3939328/irans-woman-ban-in-focus-after-fan-set-self-afire
FIFA needs to do something, if they don't, the soccer community needs to make a stand.Holy **** if that doesn't bring more of a spotlight on the issues in Iran I don't know what possibly can.
You should see the men’s 11. Some selections are baffling based on last season. Modric? Marcelo!?!?!?Pretty terrible having people like Morgan and Marta in there over the likes of Ada, Miedema, and no Groenen, etc.
Pretty terrible having people like Morgan and Marta in there over the likes of Ada, Miedema, and no Groenen, etc.
That and they didn't even select a RB, they had 3 CB's and a LB.You should see the men’s 11. Some selections are baffling based on last season. Modric? Marcelo!?!?!?