schwang26
Registered User
- Mar 15, 2022
- 4,828
- 4,628
Top 4 right handed D. “Worthless”. Hmmmm.He was traded for Barron. So, yes, worthless.
Top 4 right handed D. “Worthless”. Hmmmm.He was traded for Barron. So, yes, worthless.
A decent 3rd pairing guy with a high cap hit is negative value. Barron had no value.Interesting Carrier is still signed for a couple years after this at a pretty high cap hit, wonder what his value on the open market was, probably worthless
I was joking. Look at my post below that.Top 4 right handed D. “Worthless”. Hmmmm.
Barron was in his d+2. You should apply for a job in the NHL if you can evaluate a player to be a bust in his d+2 you'd make millions a year cause people working for NHL teams can't do that.That's different though,
Those 3 1st round picks are not specific individual players, they're a sandbox, and yes that value is amazing.
We traded Lekky for a bad Dman, period.
Nashville is in a bind. They won the UFA signing cup this summer, built up a bunch of goodwill yet have been a disaster. They’re probably in a place where they need to shake things up.Probably because no team showed any level of interest in Dipshit
I posted my take last night:Barron sucked many of commented many times on this
KH was not going to get zip for him and if sent down, loose him for zip
good deal KH. Barron did not work out. end of story
Can we comment on some points of what the new dude brings?
looking forward in seeing in a CH jerseyA decent 3rd pairing guy with a high cap hit is negative value. Barron had no value.
Don't think Carrier is a top 4. He's a 3rd pairing guy. One or even two seasons doesn't make a career.Top 4 right handed D. “Worthless”. Hmmmm.
I have a feeling he is going to play top pair with Guhle 5 on 5, and likely play some good PK minutes as well. He is the best RD we have right now.A decent 3rd pairing guy with a high cap hit is negative value. Barron had no value.
He got some Calder support 3 years ago.The guy was voted 10th in Norris voting 2 years ago?
I think it made sense to give him (and the overall category of Barron/Mailloux/Reinbacher) a shot to see if any of them could run with it. One got hurt and the other two showed they aren't ready while Hutson completely eliminated the short term need to keep a solid PP2 option around. I don't think it was impatient to trade him after giving him another chance that he squandered, when Hutson has solidified his role, and when it became clear that Savard couldn't be the same kind of stabilizing presence he was last year. Part of why I personally didn't really think Barron would be traded is because I didn't expect us to get a player like Carrier for him and there's no point trading Barron for a 3rd round pick just for the sake of it. Not that Carrier is some superstar or anything, but he's a pretty good vet #4-5ishD and usually teams don't trade those guys away this early in the season.Over summer a good few of us knew from looking at the depth chart, and calmly expressed, that Barron was one of the odd men out if he doesn’t make a significant improvement. People who disagreed insisted that we were impatient (that word again) and Barron had untapped upside.
Is Hughes now impatient and has he squandered Barron’s upside? I don’t suspect we’ll see much criticism allowed against the Habs GM.
Hutson and Carrier are the only sub 6'0 defencemen on the team. Carrier is not physical but he's not some fancy puck mover type either, he's a DFD and he'll help Guhle open things up more. Someone brought up Mike Weaver as a style comparable earlier, he won't be physical but I think you'll probably end up liking him. He's going to be a nice fit with Xhekaj next year after Savard leaves.The last thing our blueline needed, with a god given talent like Hutson back there, is another sub 6'/200lb scrub
Carrier was in interview with La Poche Bleu
He is. I think he’ll play with Hutson. Guhle will be with Matheson until they can figure that out.I have a feeling he is going to play top pair with Guhle 5 on 5, and likely play some good PK minutes as well. He is the best RD we have right now.
Decent 3rd pairing guys signed for 3 millions are usually worth a a 2nd round pick or 3rd round pick. We got a 2nd for Gorges and a 3rd for Emelin both sigend at 4 millions. Were they better than Carrier maybe but while i liked both they were overrated by many fans they were playing too much here and did not do much for their new team once traded.A decent 3rd pairing guy with a high cap hit is negative value. Barron had no value.
But you see my friendGreat move. He’s only 28 so he’ll be around while Mailloux and Reinbacher develop. Both will need more time in the ahl next year imo. It’ll be interesting to see how Struble gets back in now. A healthy Habs team is hard to wrap my head around!
Value? Are you sure Nashville did not want to free up some cap space for another major trade? Barron contract has around 1m vs 3.75m for Carrier.Pretty good return for Barron. He obviously had some value. He needs more time but I still think he can work out.
Maybe negative value on paper, but a legit NHL RD that can play now vs Barron who’s, using generous terms, not ready yet.A decent 3rd pairing guy with a high cap hit is negative value. Barron had no value.
Need to move Matheson. That makes it a little easier to sneak Struble into the lineup. I’d hate to lose Struble but I don’t think he’ll be here either. Ghule and Hutson have top two. Then there’s X….Great move. He’s only 28 so he’ll be around while Mailloux and Reinbacher develop. Both will need more time in the ahl next year imo. It’ll be interesting to see how Struble gets back in now. A healthy Habs team is hard to wrap my head around!
Well, he only has 3 "full" seasons excluding this one (counting as "full" the season he was injured -- full here means "full-time NHL'er"), and he was at worst Nashville's 4th D in terms of TOI in each of them. He was also a Top-4 D in terms of usage this season, and a Top-4 D during his first real "partial" season in 2021.Don't think Carrier is a top 4. He's a 3rd pairing guy. One or even two seasons doesn't make a career.
To me this seems like he pretty much waited until the end too. Now if he traded Mailloux and Roy this season I would see this lesson, otherwise, Barron for Carrier seems like a classic MB trade. I’m still a fan of the trade.Another lesson here: HuGo is willing to cut their losses if a guy is not showing signs of progress. Better than Bergevin who waited till the very end