Waived: Alex Barré-Boulet on Waivers (Purpose to be sent to Laval)

WatchfulElm

Former "Domi a favor"
Jan 31, 2007
6,043
3,979
Rive-Sud
Maybe it was bound to happen at some point anyway. So maybe the reasoning was that it was better to do it now, when most teams (except Colorado?) aren't plagued by injuries yet and still have full line-ups, so it makes it less likely for ABB to be claimed.
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,102
2,623
Oakville, ON
Laval would be a great place to play hockey for $775,000 a year
Never understood why pros (on the fringe) were not ecstatic to become regular "employees' of the AHL.
Eff NHL, if the opportunity is not there.
$750k to play in Laval is like winning the lottery. Teach the younger kids, check your ego at the door.
 

Chili

What wind blew you hither?
Jun 10, 2004
8,736
4,839
Thought they may do this at the beginning of the season i.e. the day 59 players were on waivers. Even if they were planning on keeping him, he's cleared before and would have avoided exposing him now. If he is claimed though, it opens up a roster spot to add someone. He's a good guy to have in Laval if they need a callup.
 

BaseballCoach

Registered User
Dec 15, 2006
21,193
9,552
I think it's more Struble injury that means we need a 7th dman.

While Struble is out, I hope Barron plays the lion's share of the games, and plays through his warts.
If we need a 7th, don't be surprised if Gustav Lindstrom gets the call.
 

Harry Kakalovich

Like and reply
Sep 26, 2002
6,497
4,765
Montreal
I think they can waive him even if they're not sending him down to Laval if they think he will clear. Then they have 30 days where he can be sent down without having to clear.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad