I honsetly didn't think that we had players that were capable of playing a more talent based system.
I was so used to seeing the endless dump, chase and grind it out. Dump, chase and grind it out that when the season started and the guys were having difficulties stringing together 2-3 passes to get up ice I really thought we were in for a very disappointing season.
They seems ot have turned that around and they are much more enjoyabe to watch play the game.
I think that there's a lot more balance to the team now than what we had in years past.
On the contrary lately I had felt the Rangers didn't really have the players to play a dump and chase and grind game cuz you need bigger players for that. A guy like Brassard isn't a world beater in terms of skill but he is above average in terms of skilled compared to the rest of the NHL, so it's not surprising he does pretty well when allowed to hold the puck and make plays. Same with a guy like Zucc, etc.
I've felt the past couple of years that the Rangers were generally more skilled than people gave them credit for, just not top end super star skilled, and I think where Tortorella lost it was buying into his own preaching that the Rangers weren't skilled enough to do anything but get rid of the puck as soon as they got it.
Did you think they could play puck possession in 11-12?
Did you think they could play puck possession in 11-12?
They did play puck possession hockey, except it was always grinding it along the walls. That Ranger team won a lot of those battles and that lead to their success.
Philly plays that way this year and have made up a ton of ground after their lottery status start.
I would venture and say that puck possession hockey can be played two ways... through skill and speed and passing, or through mucking it up along the boards.
It really comes down to the type of roster a team has to pull it all off.
They were more of a puck possession team in the regular season but I think they were pretty average in that area still. Ironically, they got worse when they became a better puck possession team. In March they were bleeding goals against but were giving up barely over 20 shots were game. Lundqvist had a horrible month but they were also allowing great chances against. In the playoffs they were a terrible possession team though.
Are crazy.
I'm so much more confident going into battle with this team than any of Tort's teams. These guys for the most part show up every night, some lapses but work every night. So many letdowns from game to game with Tort's teams. When we're behind I still feel like we're in the game until the end. I never felt like that under Tort's.
I'm a Tortorella fan but this system suits me just fine. And you know what I don't miss most of all??? Those 5 on 5 power plays that we always had to defend against for a good 5 minutes every game under Tort's
Are crazy.
I'm so much more confident going into battle with this team than any of Tort's teams. These guys for the most part show up every night, some lapses but work every night. So many letdowns from game to game with Tort's teams. When we're behind I still feel like we're in the game until the end. I never felt like that under Tort's.
I'm a Tortorella fan but this system suits me just fine. And you know what I don't miss most of all??? Those 5 on 5 power plays that we always had to defend against for a good 5 minutes every game under Tort's
MSL has been tried out with nearly everyone, and has proceeded to do jack **** with nearly everyone.I'm happy with AV overall, as I've said, but I really don't get his thinking with the third line.
Why not call up a player from the A to play with Richie and MSL? Richie himself drags that line down regardless of who is on the wings. Why completely invalidate the line with a fourth liner up there, which also ruins the fourth line?
Regardless of what anybody thinks of the MSL trade, the guy is here now, and to put him with Richards and Boyle/Moore/Carcillo is to completely misuse an asset, an asset which should be able to provide exactly what the team lacks, which is scoring.
I don't get this thinking at all.
MSL has been tried out with nearly everyone, and has proceeded to do jack **** with nearly everyone.
This is on MSL, 100%.
Are crazy.
I'm so much more confident going into battle with this team than any of Tort's teams. These guys for the most part show up every night, some lapses but work every night. So many letdowns from game to game with Tort's teams. When we're behind I still feel like we're in the game until the end. I never felt like that under Tort's.
I'm a Tortorella fan but this system suits me just fine. And you know what I don't miss most of all??? Those 5 on 5 power plays that we always had to defend against for a good 5 minutes every game under Tort's
MSL has been tried out with nearly everyone, and has proceeded to do jack **** with nearly everyone.
This is on MSL, 100%.
Sure. I'm not saying it's not. I'm saying he's here now, the assets have been spent, he's in the lineup. Why on earth is he being played with Richards and Boyle/Moore/Carcillo/Dorsett? The guy is a scorer. He has the ability to score. Obviously, he's not been doing it enough since getting here, but is that it? We're giving up on the guy? This team needs goals. He's been scoring goals for longer than some of these players have been out of high school. Playing him with Richards and one of those guys is a waste. If he and Nash don't score in the playoffs, the season is over real quick. He needs to be put in a spot where he at least has an outside chance of succeeding.
What about Hagelin-Moore-St.Louis? Both speedy guys who are good on the boards, have enough hockey sense to crash the net and pass to Marty.
I'd love to see this come playoff time:
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Hagelin-Moore-St.Louis
Pouliot-Brassard-Zuccarello
Carcillo-Boyle-Dorsett
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Klein
Stralman-Diaz
What? Seriously?
April fools was like a week ago.
This was utterly predictable. And we have also seen this script before. Bring in an aging star. Aging star does not produce. The discussion of what player needs to be brought in to jump start the aging start starts. The off season is then spent trading for help for said aging star.This is on MSL, 100%.
This was utterly predictable. And we have also seen this script before. Bring in an aging star. Aging star does not produce. The discussion of what player needs to be brought in to jump start the aging start starts. The off season is then spent trading for help for said aging star.
As you said, MSL's play is NOT on AV. This is a 38 year old player. Not a green rookie.
But on the topic of the thread, I DO have concerns about AV's style of play. I have never thought that it is conducive to playoff success.