Toggle sidebar

Value of: Adam Pelech or Ryan Pulock

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
impaaaaaact

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
1,903
1,663
Brooklyn, NY
I could see either being moved this offseason - neither quite meshed with Roy’s system as well as they did with Trotz.

Our biggest need is a top 6 winger, but potentially one that is comfortable on the PK.

Both players have NTCs, so going to a rebuilder is unlikely. Pelech is from Toronto and Pulock is from Manitoba.
Click to read more...
 
impaaaaaact

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
1,903
1,663
Brooklyn, NY
SHANNYPLAN said:
Marner for Both?

Obviously this would just the the base, but I think it could make sense for both teams. Especially if the islanders can add a dman.
Click to expand...

StuckOutHere said:
Marner (extended) for Pelech, Pageau, Iskhakov, TBL 1st.
Click to expand...
This is a trade I would make, and I bet they both waive to go to Toronto too. Would represent a seismic shift in Isles culture and would open up 2 D spots for players Roy might have a say in.
 
Pure Slaughter Value

Pure Slaughter Value

Registered User
Jun 6, 2002
6,425
4,244
New York
Visit site
StuckOutHere said:
Marner (extended) for Pelech, Pageau, Iskhakov, TBL 1st.
Click to expand...

Lou would have to have a ton of dirt on Shanahan and Berube to get that trade done.

Trading Pulock to Winnipeg makes sense from an Isles POV. To be honest, no idea if Winnipeg would want him or for what type of return.

Isles are stuck, I could see Pageau being moved either for a mid-round pick or along with draft picks for a player to play in the bottom 6 for the Isles. MOAR GRITZZZZ
 
Djp

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,510
5,965
Alexandria, VA
impaaaaaact said:
I could see either being moved this offseason - neither quite meshed with Roy’s system as well as they did with Trotz.

Our biggest need is a top 6 winger, but potentially one that is comfortable on the PK.

Both players have NTCs, so going to a rebuilder is unlikely. Pelech is from Toronto and Pulock is from Manitoba.
Click to expand...
Arent they both long contracts pushing 30+?
 
Pure Slaughter Value

Pure Slaughter Value

Registered User
Jun 6, 2002
6,425
4,244
New York
Visit site
Djp said:
Arent they both long contracts pushing 30+?
Click to expand...

Yeah. That being said, at worst they're 2nd pairing d-men (with Pulock first or second PP, Pelech PK) long term under 6.

In the case of Winnipeg, everyone save Morrissey is either a UFA or RFA this offseason or next. There's probably a bunch of teams that aren't willing to go into every season looking for a bargain and want some kind of stability in their top 4.
 
crashthenet

crashthenet

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
6,084
1,333
Hockey Falls
WangMustGo said:
I like Ehlers, but not if the cost is Pulock
Click to expand...
Pulock is ridiculously under-valued by a few folks. Pelech is the one to go. Change of scenery and different style of play would benefit him. Utah has few defenseman under contract. Seems like a good spot. They have more picks than they would want to use and an expendable forward or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seafoam, Bill Herlyn and WangMustGo
CanMerc

CanMerc

#FIRECHEVY
Dec 7, 2023
591
783
Pulock to WPG would be amazing…I’d start the offer with Ehlers + Heinola….
 
Killer Orcas

Killer Orcas

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
8,199
6,428
Abbotsford BC
How about Hronek to Ducks, Zegras to Islanders and Pulock to Canucks? Hronek would need to be extended of course. Zegras though a centre could play wing but don't believe kills penalties. Hronek gives Ducks a top pairing RHD and Canucks have Hughes new partner. Maybe a tweak here and there but as a basis everyone get's what they need?
 
miscs75

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,203
5,853
Killer Orcas said:
How about Hronek to Ducks, Zegras to Islanders and Pulock to Canucks? Hronek would need to be extended of course. Zegras though a centre could play wing but don't believe kills penalties. Hronek gives Ducks a top pairing RHD and Canucks have Hughes new partner. Maybe a tweak here and there but as a basis everyone get's what they need?
Click to expand...
No, we already have Pierre Engvall to play the pillow soft role and Mat Barzal for the looks. Zegras isn’t better then Horvat or Nelson at this point and he’s not going to play wing.

CanMerc said:
Pulock to WPG would be amazing…I’d start the offer with Ehlers + Heinola….
Click to expand...
Personally there’s only one forward (not Ehlers) on Winnipeg I want and there’s no way you’re giving him up. Heinola also does nothing for the Isles except clog up a roster spot and cap space so you can keep him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killer Orcas
miscs75

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,203
5,853
impaaaaaact said:
I could see either being moved this offseason - neither quite meshed with Roy’s system as well as they did with Trotz.

Our biggest need is a top 6 winger, but potentially one that is comfortable on the PK.

Both players have NTCs, so going to a rebuilder is unlikely. Pelech is from Toronto and Pulock is from Manitoba.
Click to expand...
Then it’s solved, the Islanders will get Charlie McAvoy from Long Beach and Shane Pinto from Carle Place to fill those needs.
 
CanMerc

CanMerc

#FIRECHEVY
Dec 7, 2023
591
783
miscs75 said:
No, we already have Pierre Engvall to play the pillow soft role and Mat Barzal for the looks. Zegras isn’t better then Horvat or Nelson at this point and he’s not going to play wing.


Personally there’s only one forward (not Ehlers) on Winnipeg I want and there’s no way you’re giving him up. Heinola also does nothing for the Isles except clog up a roster spot and cap space so you can keep him.
Click to expand...
Ok…got me curious….which forward?….please say Appleton…:sarcasm:

You put Ehlers with Horvat and Barzal and you have a dangerous top line…as for Heinola, I find you’d want a D in return, but if not then what would you be looking for?
 
miscs75

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,203
5,853
CanMerc said:
Ok…got me curious….which forward?….please say Appleton…:sarcasm:

You put Ehlers with Horvat and Barzal and you have a dangerous top line…as for Heinola, I find you’d want a D in return, but if not then what would you be looking for?
Click to expand...
Nope, the ginger (with 2 first names) who scores goals like Ziggy Palffy did in the mid 90s for the Isles. Much better fit for Horvat and Barzal honestly.
As for Heinola, the Isles don’t need another bottom pairing/7th LHD with the emergence of Mike Reilly (who will be resigned) plus Pelech and Romanov on the left side as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanMerc

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,296
12,264
Huffer said:
An extended Ehlers is more than enough. 0 interest in adding Heinola.
Click to expand...
An extended Ehlers for Pulock would be a good trade for both teams.
Something like 7 x 7m.

What about KC for Pulock and a 1st in 2025?
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,296
12,264
miscs75 said:
Nope, the ginger (with 2 first names) who scores goals like Ziggy Palffy did in the mid 90s for the Isles. Much better fit for Horvat and Barzal honestly.
As for Heinola, the Isles don’t need another bottom pairing/7th LHD with the emergence of Mike Reilly (who will be resigned) plus Pelech and Romanov on the left side as well.
Click to expand...
Who is that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X