Abbotsford Canucks | Season Starting

orcatown

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2003
10,416
8,058
Visit site
Do goons actually protect players from cheap shots?

Absolutely not or with very little effect in my opinion. Lifelong pro hockey players are smart enough not to be deterred by lame tactics like that.
Doesn't make sense. Why would teams keep players like this around if they didn't provide somw utility. Why are enforcers used at every level of pro league - especially in Leagues such as the AHL.

They are there for an obvious reason.

And what proof do have so call "lifelong pro players" are not deterred by lame tactics (which I guess you mean head shots). Most interviews about this topic with pros acknowledge and appreciate the need for someone like Odjick. Bure certainly did. Maybe you've got access to interviews with players that refute this. If so, let's see or hear them.

And as far as players not being detered by such "lame tactics" I wonder what Friedland or Boeser might say. Aren't they a little deterred at the moment. You don't think maybe Podkolzin was deterred last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megaterio Llamas

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,909
92,419
Vancouver, BC
The AHL seems to be selling enforcer fights and the threat of extreme violence to the fans in some their non traditional markets. It's the only rationale for their non action in these incidents that seem to keep repeating themselves.

I'm open to other explanations, but can't offer any myself.

The AHL superficially tries to market itself as a league to 'watch future stars play' but when you get to the guts of the deal nobody in small US markets has any idea who Logan Stankoven is and they're still using fights and violence to sell tickets. And they can't afford to take it out of the game in what is still largely a gate-driven league so they're caught in-between in this ludicrous situation where they're enabling goons to injure the 'star young players' that the league is theoretically supposed to be all about.
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
16,779
16,094
What in the world are talking about. Dallas/Texas has got all kinds of size and toughness throughout their line including:

Curtis Mavkenzie (one of the better fighters in the League)

Alexander Petrovic (who has been an enforcer for years at the both the NHL and the AHL

Kyle Looft (decent fighter)

Lian Bischel (huge and very aggressive)

Mike Karow (legit fighter)

and others who bring vet toughness

Using them as example of team that doesn't use toughness or have toughness is simply wrong and mindless. Why don't you really find an AHl team that doesn't have toughness. (outside of Abbotsford)

Then exaggerating that anyone who wants some toughness to protect our prospects just wants a team of thugs and knuckle draggers is just a way to deflect away from the point that people legitmately want the younger smaller players protected .

All people are saying is that like any team at this level you need a couple of players at least to make other teams have some fear about taking open runs at our players. Maybe the Laegue should do more but it obviously doesn't. You have to take care of this problem of protecting your team. To think and argue otherwise is mindless and pathetically unrealistic
Wow you get really petty and vindictive anytime anyone dare challenge your opinion. One thing to argue back and forth but quite another to go on a smear campaign with childish name calling. I've lost a lot of respect for you it seems you have to be the voice of reason or it's "mindless and pathetic" to think different from the all knowing.

It didn't work in the 90s and doesn't work today. More likely that the fighters get CTE and die young and others get hurt as part of the antiquated circus you're asking for than somebody gets protected by intimidation

Nobody is afraid of the players you listed and wont hit hard because a couple 32yr olds in Petrovic and Mckenzie are on the team. Might as well list all the 6ft 2 Abby Canucks?

Bischel? Pettersson? are the Swiss more intimidating than the Swedes? Odd that Desharnais Myers Soucy Miller didn't intimidate Jeannot and prevent Garland from getting beat up by Haula?

It's sad given the plight of fighters like Rick Rypien and many others that someone would be demanding they hire a bunch of fighters or as you put it "fear" players to risk themselves for others. Time to put down the rock em sock em videos. No one player is worth more than another when it comes to health.

The more likely issue here is that AHLers are a more transient group looking to get noticed unlike the fraternity of the NHL under a code and that players like Podkolzin Rathbone and others play with their heads down and got smashed (right or wrong) because of it. Our management group has obviously chosen not to give valuable ice time to these types of tactics/players and the game is trying to phase out past thuggery without stamping out fighting completely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tables of Stats

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,661
16,143
The AHL is basically a development league for some of your later round picks; or first round picks who've been slow to develop. And the league provides a living for AHL veteran players before they either decide to pack it in, or head to Europe.

The real superstars in the NHL drafted at the very top of the first round, rarely spend any time in the AHL. And even on the Canucks, guys like Pettersson and Hughes never spent a single game in the AHL.

The reality is, there's some risk sending a really high, talented first rounder to the AHL. Oli Juolevi was hurt playing for the Utica Comets, and was never the same again. Concussion and knee injuries are the biggest worry, as some of the checking in the AHL can be downright ugly and dangerous.

That's why it's a relief to see Lekkerimaki up with the Canucks. And unless he does a complete face-plant, I believe there's a good chance he's up for the rest of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megaterio Llamas

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,419
6,235
North Shore
The AHL is basically a development league for some of your later round picks; or first round picks who've been slow to develop. And the league provides a living for AHL veteran players before they either decide to pack it in, or head to Europe.

The real superstars in the NHL drafted at the very top of the first round, rarely spend any time in the AHL. And even on the Canucks, guys like Pettersson and Hughes never spent a single game in the AHL.

The reality is, there's some risk sending a really high, talented first rounder to the AHL. Oli Juolevi was hurt playing for the Utica Comets, and was never the same again. Concussion and knee injuries are the biggest worry, as some of the checking in the AHL can be downright ugly and dangerous.

That's why it's a relief to see Lekkerimaki up with the Canucks. And unless he does a complete face-plant, I believe there's a good chance he's up for the rest of the season.

Yeah, that's really it in a nutshell right there. It's unfortunate that we're even arguing about this here; I wasn't expecting it because as far as I'm concerned everyone here is in full agreement that goons and gratuitoius violence need to be removed from what is supposed to be the NHL's premier development league. We only differ in regard to what we should do about it in the present reality where nearly every other team than the Abbotsford Canucks is carrying a measure of toughness on the roster ranging from tough AHL vets, to ridiculous goons.

I'm personally speaking out of a sense of exasperation having watched Vasily Podkolzin and Mark Friedman in the last calendar year nearly be killed on the ice in non hockey plays by what are essentially 1970s style hired goons and the league not even speaking to the player about the incident, much less fine or suspend. And countless lesser incidents so commonplace they don't even register anymore. If you remember the movie Slapshot, the AHL is currently more simillar than it is different to it.

I'm not going to go around on this anymore, I just want to stress that we're largely all on common ground here regarding the violence and the need to get it out of the AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat

orcatown

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2003
10,416
8,058
Visit site
Wow you get really petty and vindictive anytime anyone dare challenge your opinion. One thing to argue back and forth but quite another to go on a smear campaign with childish name calling. I've lost a lot of respect for you it seems you have to be the voice of reason or it's "mindless and pathetic" to think different from the all knowing.

It didn't work in the 90s and doesn't work today. More likely that the fighters get CTE and die young and others get hurt as part of the antiquated circus you're asking for than somebody gets protected by intimidation

Nobody is afraid of the players you listed and wont hit hard because a couple 32yr olds in Petrovic and Mckenzie are on the team. Might as well list all the 6ft 2 Abby Canucks?

Bischel? Pettersson? are the Swiss more intimidating than the Swedes? Odd that Desharnais Myers Soucy Miller didn't intimidate Jeannot and prevent Garland from getting beat up by Haula?

It's sad given the plight of fighters like Rick Rypien and many others that someone would be demanding they hire a bunch of fighters or as you put it "fear" players to risk themselves for others. Time to put down the rock em sock em videos. No one player is worth more than another when it comes to health.

The more likely issue here is that AHLers are a more transient group looking to get noticed unlike the fraternity of the NHL under a code and that players like Podkolzin Rathbone and others play with their heads down and got smashed (right or wrong) because of it. Our management group has obviously chosen not to give valuable ice time to these types of tactics/players and the game is trying to phase out past thuggery without stamping out fighting completely.
I'm saying your arguments are pathetic and wrong. You're the one engaging in ad hominen attacks and you continue this in your last post by saying I'm trying to be God-like and are too thin-skinned. I address what you argue and you address some thing about another person's character. Why don't you stick to addressing what the person is saying.

The central argument here is : Do you need enforcers on your AHL team to protect, in particular your younger prospects, and, in general, the team. And, second, does Abby need some tougher players to provide a deterrance against having our team run and badly hurt?

You argue that they don't need this. As an argument for this, you say players were badly hurt with many suffering long term injuries b/c of things like fighting. This is no doubt true, but it has little to nothing to do with the argument whether enforcers are necessary. It is, instead an argument for outlawing completely fighting and malcious dangerous hits.

While many might agree with this, it is irrelevant to the question of whether teams presently need enforcers to protect their players. Given that the AHL nor the NHL (let allow the thugery in the ECHL), has not outlawed, or even done anything significant to stop fights and dirty hits, I'd say teams need to do their own policing. While some may dream of some mystical Eden were fighting and head shots are somehow removed, the reality is that they remain an on-going basis.

Given that fighting, head shots and other forms of initimitation are still permitted or, are not effectively elimated, we need to deal with the situation as it is. And given that the Leagues have not done this, teams need to seek out other alternatives to protect their players. Right now, the way they do this is to have certain players around to retaliate if the other team tries to hurt your players. It may not be what we want, but it is what is being done. This is how the game, in reality, is policed. Teams balance the situation by each team having some players designated to step in and even out the situation when a team mate is abused.

I am not af arguing for more fighting or violence but only that we live in reality and do more to protect our players in Abbotsford.

You also argue that you don't need enforcers since Texas/Dallas did well without enforcers. That just is not true. They were and are one of the biggest and toughest teams in League. Beyond that, stating that Petrovic (actually 6'5" ) and MacKenzie can't be effective enforcers b/c they are 32 and only 6'2" is IMO silly. Reaves is 37, Deslauriers is 33, Dillon is 34 and again you could on and on. There are any number of players beyond the age of 32 that enforce at the AHL and NHL level. And you bringing up Rypien should be enough to tell you guys 6'2' and smasller can be enforcers. Any analysis of the facts would prove your suggestions are just flat out wrong.

Then you say Pettersson provides the same level of toughness as does Bischel before adding on some nonsense about the Swedes and the Swiss. Even if I concede Pettersson is the equal to Bischel (which I don't think this is true), Bischel provides a secondary type toughness. He has around him players that bring a higher level of initimation. And do you want a youngster like Pettersson taking on the role of enforcer in a League that has much bigger and experienced fighters than him??? Guys like Gallant, Imama, Howe, Douglas, Neuber, Mckay, Viel, MIddleton, Harpur, Geersten, Watson and on, and on, who, at this point, would beat him up. And, we have no one else to step in for Pettersson if he was confronted.

And funny thing is that by suggesting Pettersson is able to provide toughness you are actually admitting that toughness is needed. Why talk about Pettersson providing toughness if it unnecessasy? Defeats everything you saying you don't need toughness.

And finally, the most troubling part of your arguments is the suggeston that players like Podkolzin, Rathbone, Friedland and the many others that have been concussed or badly hurt, deserved it because they didn't keep their heads up. In many of these cases these player were run from behind or totally blind sided. Go look at the video of these hits and you'll see it's true.

In the end, it comes down to one central point - Should the Abbotsford Canucks get more deterrance into their lineup? My contention is that b/c of the way the game is played in the AHL (maybe not the way we would like it played) you do need such players. Another point to support this is that every other team in the AHL has at least a couple of enforcers. I would also say that the number of serious injuries to Abby players testifies to the need for protective players. I would content, in the end, that if want to err on the side of caution you should at least consider this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
16,103
9,706
The AHL superficially tries to market itself as a league to 'watch future stars play' but when you get to the guts of the deal nobody in small US markets has any idea who Logan Stankoven is and they're still using fights and violence to sell tickets. And they can't afford to take it out of the game in what is still largely a gate-driven league so they're caught in-between in this ludicrous situation where they're enabling goons to injure the 'star young players' that the league is theoretically supposed to be all about.

Yeah, enforcers (like, actual traditional heavyweight types, not just regular players who can also beat the shit out of you) aren't a significant deterrent at the NHL level anymore because their role became more or less purely symbolic.

They were a deterrent back when Gino Odjick would spear Al McInnis or blatantly run Dominic Hasek. If you stepped out of line, the other team's heavyweight might literally kill you or one of your teammates and it'd be your fault. That was the deterrent.

Obviously that's also, like, just bad in numerous ways, and I think we probably saw the last of that in the NHL back with that whole Penguins v. Islanders shitshow that culminated in Trevor Gillies looking like an absolute f***ing buffoon standing in the open gate screaming at a player he'd just concussed while he was on the ice being tended to by the trainer. Now the heavyweight's only role in the NHL is to occasionally rumble out onto the ice and have a fight with the other heavyweight to ceremonially "calm the game down."

Minor pro hockey, though, all bets are off. The shitshow is still a - if not the - legitimate draw, and law of the jungle is very much in effect. Since you still have actual goon-player interactions down there, there's actually still a deterrence element to the role so you might as well have someone around if you have any assets to protect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mossey3535

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad