Abbotsford Canucks | Season Starting

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,631
91,409
Vancouver, BC
I’ve watched him play live so much that I can’t envision a scenario where he’s actually able to make the NHL as a real player.

Yeah, the literal best-possible outcome is that he scores 25 goals or something in the AHL this year and we somehow get a little bit of value for him in some sort of package deal at the deadline.

The guy makes Daniel Sprong look like Patrice Bergeron. I don't think he's ever going to play in the NHL for anyone but he's sure as hell never going to play in the NHL for Rick Tocchet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

wonton15

Höglander
Dec 13, 2009
20,248
29,828
Yeah, the literal best-possible outcome is that he scores 25 goals or something in the AHL this year and we somehow get a little bit of value for him in some sort of package deal at the deadline.

The guy makes Daniel Sprong look like Patrice Bergeron. I don't think he's ever going to play in the NHL for anyone but he's sure as hell never going to play in the NHL for Rick Tocchet.
Yeah, they should try to pump and dump him. I think he’s the clear top candidate as the throw in prospect in the upcoming defense trade. Perfect trade chip as a “quantity” B tier piece - like a Joni Jurmo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector and Lindgren

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,206
45,912
Junktown
Yeah, the literal best-possible outcome is that he scores 25 goals or something in the AHL this year and we somehow get a little bit of value for him in some sort of package deal at the deadline.

The guy makes Daniel Sprong look like Patrice Bergeron. I don't think he's ever going to play in the NHL for anyone but he's sure as hell never going to play in the NHL for Rick Tocchet.

Yeah, they should try to pump and dump him. I think he’s the clear top candidate as the throw in prospect in the upcoming defense trade. Perfect trade chip as a “quantity” B tier piece - like a Joni Jurmo.

Joni Jurmo was considered positive value for the Flames and Klimovich is pretty much the exact same player. So there’s hope someone see value in him this year if he can just turn it around a little bit.
 

alternate

Win the week!
Jun 9, 2006
8,537
3,803
victoria
The club played him with Hughes through the 2023 preseason and when they're listing players they're really high on his name always seems to be in the mix. A few posters here also seem to really like him when they watch the games.

I just don't see it. Nothing about him projects.

The team has name checked him constantly and apparently are interested in what he can do with the NHL team.

Sure, but all that has quieted down with the start he's had. Don't think anyone is pumping his tires recently.

Still think he's got a path to being a 3rd pairing guy with good mobility and transition game. But the cupboard for bottom of the roster dmen prospects is getting a bit cluttered, so he needs to take a step before he gets left behind.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,206
45,912
Junktown
Sure, but all that has quieted down with the start he's had. Don't think anyone is pumping his tires recently.

Still think he's got a path to being a 3rd pairing guy with good mobility and transition game. But the cupboard for bottom of the roster dmen prospects is getting a bit cluttered, so he needs to take a step before he gets left behind.

The Canucks are going to hope their current group can iron out some of the defensive looseness they’ve exhibited in the early going, and there’s curiosity about what Cole McWard might be able to bring to the Vancouver lineup at some point this season.

This is from a Thomas Drance article two days ago.

I want to like McWard and do trust this teams management to evaluate their own prospects but every time I’ve watched in the last year, I’ve not noticed he was on the ice. I hope he can stay healthy and have a big development year because, as you say, he’ll get left behind pretty quick.
 

alternate

Win the week!
Jun 9, 2006
8,537
3,803
victoria
Curiosity about what he might bring isn't exactly a runaway hype machine. But sure, if you feel there's a bunch of hype around McWard, ok. Doesn't really matter to the point MS was making about his viability as a prospect. I liked his initial showing, but not sure he's improved at all since. Hype or not, MS is correct in that McWard needs to show more, and soon.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,631
91,409
Vancouver, BC
Sure, but all that has quieted down with the start he's had. Don't think anyone is pumping his tires recently.

Still think he's got a path to being a 3rd pairing guy with good mobility and transition game. But the cupboard for bottom of the roster dmen prospects is getting a bit cluttered, so he needs to take a step before he gets left behind.

He’s a slightly undersized 4-5D at the AHL level who is butter-soft defensively and doesn’t produce much offense. He’s in his draft+6.

To me he’s not a prospect at all. Jett Woo is head-and-shoulders a better player and Woo is not going to make it, it doesn’t look like.

The Canucks are going to hope their current group can iron out some of the defensive looseness they’ve exhibited in the early going, and there’s curiosity about what Cole McWard might be able to bring to the Vancouver lineup at some point this season.

This is from a Thomas Drance article two days ago.

I want to like McWard and do trust this teams management to evaluate their own prospects but every time I’ve watched in the last year, I’ve not noticed he was on the ice. I hope he can stay healthy and have a big development year because, as you say, he’ll get left behind pretty quick.

Exactly. It’s weird to read stuff like this because it doesn’t line up with what’s actually happening with the player. He just isn’t very good.
 

Lindgren

Registered User
Jun 30, 2005
6,308
4,357
He’s a slightly undersized 4-5D at the AHL level who is butter-soft defensively and doesn’t produce much offense. He’s in his draft+6.

To me he’s not a prospect at all. Jett Woo is head-and-shoulders a better player and Woo is not going to make it, it doesn’t look like.



Exactly. It’s weird to read stuff like this because it doesn’t line up with what’s actually happening with the player. He just isn’t very good.
My impression, and the experts can (will) correct me if I'm wrong, is that he's not getting significant time on either special team. So, he's good at ...?

Get Felton (aka NCAA guy) in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Bruce Banner

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad