Commander Clueless
Hiya, hiya. Pleased to meetcha.
- Sep 10, 2008
- 15,411
- 4,574
It's good to have dreams
The one I can’t stand the most from the dangle-verse is the chubby guy with theradiostrip-club DJ voice
Dangle stumbled onto some kind of secret sauce and got internet famous. Its all an act. But it seems to work.. somehow.
I can't stand him or his gimmick
He makes his living off this how on earth do you feel sorry for him?
No worries. I agree that I'm nitpicking lolAll of that is fair. I also thank you for reminding me how home ice is determined in the conference finals as well, because I had forgotten that.![]()
No worries. I agree that I'm nitpicking lol
The reason I didn’t say WC1 is because there was no wildcard in the Canadian division at the time.
So to use the same language of seeding makes the comparable easier to understand for the reader.
8th seed meaning - last playoff spot
7th seed meaning - 2nd last playoff spot
If you say blew a lead to an 8th seed and a wc2 team you’re mixing up terminology. When you start the comparison with one unit of measurement you should stay consistent throughout the comparison.
I actually don’t think Montreal was even an 8th seed. I think technically they were 4th. But they finished 18th overall, and were the equivalent of an 8th seed. Same with Ottawa being equivalent to the 7th seed this year
As they say, "stuff" happens.I don't worry too much about it lol
Right, but under that old method of 1-8, Ottawa is actually a 6th seed.
As they say, "stuff" happens.I don't worry too much about it lol
Its literally his job. Way worse things are happening than your favorite hockey team in which you have 0 impact on isnt winning.Well, at the end of the day he’s a human being with his own feelings. I don’t like seeing people suffering regardless of who they are.
Its literally his job. Way worse things are happening than your favorite hockey team in which you have 0 impact on isnt winning.
If you're doing a blend of old and new style,But the 2 seed (Toronto) doesn’t play the 6th seed . So they’re the 7th seed
We are talking about seeding and brackets, not where someone finished in the conference
If you were to write out this year’s brackets and add a seed number from 1-8 in the eastern conference how would you number them that would make sense?
Yes, Sandy, our secret weapon, ssshhhhhhh.Yep. I called it before the series started.
I've been watching all the series previews, and I find it interesting that almost nobody is even talking about the Sens' best player. All they seem to want to talk about is Tkachuk.
Literally nobody paid any attention to Ottawa. All the media wanted to talk about was Tkachuk, Stutzle and Ullmark.
Even today, people are like "oh, yeah, I guess Sanderson pretty good, but leafs leafs leafs, core 4, ullmark, tkachuk".
He's putting the team on his back right now. Shades of 2017 Karlsson. He leads any skater in time on ice in this series by a huge Margin.
TOI/GP
27:21 Sanderson
24:42 Chabot
23:32 Zub
22:58 Marner
22:28 McCabe
If you're doing a blend of old and new style,
I'd put the two division winners at 1 and 2, and then the 3-8 by points.
But isn't the goal to say that the Leafs lost to lesser teams...so wouldn't where they rank overall be more important?
They're 12th in the NHL. They're better than almost 2/3 of the NHL.
Yes I am, because I am comparing the seeding from two different playoffs with different divisions and different playoff rules.
That’s why I used a metric that was very easy for everyone to follow. 2 seed plays 7 seed and 1 seed plays 8 seed.
You’re trying really hard to not understand that![]()
If this is the worst thing thats going on in the world for you. You live a very charmed life that you should be very happy about.Oh, really? Like what?
If this is the worst thing thats going on in the world for you. You live a very charmed life that you should be very happy about.
The seeding matters less than the points though. What point were you trying to make...that it's significant...why? Because of the quality of teams, no?
Yes, Sandy, our secret weapon, ssshhhhhhh.
Pretty much lol.The battle for the right to get swept by Florida in the next round!
So you are thinking Cup in 3 years?2010 Bruins collapse: lose game 4 in OT, lose game 5 4-0
2025 Leafs so far: lose game 4 in OT, lose game 5 4-0
coincidence or omen...?
I have seen young people drink it. They even pronounced it fitty for some reason.I think you're confusing Molson dry with Labatt 50.
Old people don't want higher alcohol percentage..they want a harsh beer, without the high alcohol...so they go with Labatt 50.
Molson dry is a minimal aftertaste higher percentage alcohol beer.
It was a go-to among high school/college/university students a decade ago before the rise of craft beers/IPA etc.
Before it was, do you want 4% Coors light, Bud light, or corona...do you want 5% Budweiser, blue, or Canadian, and then do you want 5.5-6% dry beers like Molson dry.
I've seen a lot of teenagers and young adults drink Molson dry, but almost never a 50+ year old drink Molson dry.
But take Labatt 50...I've never seen a young person drink it....only old people.
I think the beer you're thinking of is Labatt 50.