Value of: A 2nd line center to Montreal.

And yet no one who isn't a Montreal fan agrees with you...hmmmm.
And that’s surprising? The mains have been an anti-Habs circlejerk for a long time, and it’s only gotten worse over the last year or so because things are starting to turn around for us. The Hutson, Demidov, and Calder threads are filled with that type of shit. But go ahead and pretend that isn’t the case.

Like the other poster was saying, you might not like the offer, but 1st round picks aren’t “spare parts” and “zero value”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loadie
Barzal is absolutely at the top of my list. I just don't think he's a realistic target because I don't think NYI would be dumb enough to trade him

Yes, I agree.

I don't think anyone in the Habs organization has Hage over Reinbacher in the depth chart. Reinbacher hasn't had any real injuries in his career except the one he had in the training camp. He's also being grossly slept on. Many journalists covering the Rockets have been saying that he's been fantastic and the only game I saw him play (Live, in Laval) he's been by far the best player on the ice.

Truth is, if he hadn't been injured during camp, he would've finished the year in Montreal. There was even talks of calling him up and playing the game #5 against Washington if Carrier was a no-go.

Anyway, that's a moot point, because he wouldn't be available in trade. I can't say the same for Hage if we're serious about acquiring a legit 2C
The issue comes down to how serious Montreal is to compete moving forward. The core showed they can play with the big boys even if it was a 4-1 series lost. Ideally you have to think the playoff and ultimately cup window is now moving forward. To get that 2C they truly want, it will hurt in the terms of future and might take a piece of the roster not named Suzuki/Caufield/Demidov/Hutson/Guhle. Even if they were the youngest team in the playoffs by a bit, they do need to make changes to upgrade and it really won’t come by offering up pieces like Laine/Matheson/Mesar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam da bomb
The issue comes down to how serious Montreal is to compete moving forward. The core showed they can play with the big boys even if it was a 4-1 series lost. Ideally you have to think the playoff and ultimately cup window is now moving forward. To get that 2C they truly want, it will hurt in the terms of future and might take a piece of the roster not named Suzuki/Caufield/Demidov/Hutson/Guhle. Even if they were the youngest team in the playoffs by a bit, they do need to make changes to upgrade and it really won’t come by offering up pieces like Laine/Matheson/Mesar.
Most Habs fans agree with you. From what I've gathered from that thread, pretty much every prospect we have (not named Reinbacher) and picks are potentially on the table. There are prospects like Hage that we are more reluctant to trade but I haven't seen anyone close the door on those prospects.

The truth is, if we're going to trade two mid teen first round picks and a top prospect like Hage I expect a Rantanen-like player coming back. I just find it funny to see a multiple 100+ pts go for 2x late first + good young NHL player and then turn around and see the ask for a career high 57 points 2C/3C being 2x mid first + a top rated prospect.

Just because Montreal has interesting pieces doesn't mean we need to move ALL of them to fill a hole that in reality shouldn't be the same cost as a top 10 powerforward in the league
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: pth2 and Grinner
Most Habs fans agree with you. From what I've gathered from that thread, pretty much every prospect we have (not named Reinbacher) and picks are potentially on the table. There are prospects like Hage that we are more reluctant to trade but I haven't seen anyone close the door on those prospects.

The truth is, if we're going to trade two mid teen first round picks and a top prospect like Hage I expect a Rantanen-like player coming back. I just find it funny to see a multiple 100+ pts go for 2x late first + good young NHL player and then turn around and see the ask for a career high 57 points 2C/3C being 2x mid first + a top rated prospect.

Just because Montreal has interesting pieces doesn't mean we need to move ALL of them to fill a hole that in reality shouldn't be the same cost as a top 10 powerforward in the league
Teams aren’t moving a Rantanen tier core piece without getting a massive haul and by massive it’s not Hage/1st/cap dump. Even with Rantanen, Colorado moved him as soon as they saw that extension talks stalled. Even Carolina flipping him to Dallas because he wouldn’t sign there was quick thinking. It had nothing to do with Rantanen and more to do with Carolina simply not asking ahead of time if he was willing to extend moving forward before making that deal. Even Lou did that with Horvat before making the trade.

As for with the Isles, you know I’ve said these quantity for quality trades don’t work for the Isles because it becomes kicking the can down the road type of ordeal. The Isles can’t move out a piece like Barzal or Horvat to get back Owen Beck/1st/mediocre bottom 6 forward or bottom pairing defenseman return (aka cap dump). That just doesn’t do anything for them except fill a short term stop gap and eat up wasted cap space in the case of the veteran. The sum of the parts has to equal more then what was moved out and a future middle-6 but more likely 3C, middle 1st in a weaker draft year (who won’t be ready for 2-3 years) and a cap dump who’s eating up a spot for a younger player unless the Isles want to waste money to buy them out really isn’t it.

Too many times we’ve seen Logan Mailloux thrown into a deal and his draft status automatically means he’s still 1st round value. He’s in his D+4 season and has played a total of 8 NHL games while getting passed on the prospect chart by quite a few players in the system.
 
Teams aren’t moving a Rantanen tier core piece without getting a massive haul and by massive it’s not Hage/1st/cap dump. Even with Rantanen, Colorado moved him as soon as they saw that extension talks stalled. Even Carolina flipping him to Dallas because he wouldn’t sign there was quick thinking. It had nothing to do with Rantanen and more to do with Carolina simply not asking ahead of time if he was willing to extend moving forward before making that deal. Even Lou did that with Horvat before making the trade.

As for with the Isles, you know I’ve said these quantity for quality trades don’t work for the Isles because it becomes kicking the can down the road type of ordeal. The Isles can’t move out a piece like Barzal or Horvat to get back Owen Beck/1st/mediocre bottom 6 forward or bottom pairing defenseman return (aka cap dump). That just doesn’t do anything for them except fill a short term stop gap and eat up wasted cap space in the case of the veteran. The sum of the parts has to equal more then what was moved out and a future middle-6 but more likely 3C, middle 1st in a weaker draft year (who won’t be ready for 2-3 years) and a cap dump who’s eating up a spot for a younger player unless the Isles want to waste money to buy them out really isn’t it.

Too many times we’ve seen Logan Mailloux thrown into a deal and his draft status automatically means he’s still 1st round value. He’s in his D+4 season and has played a total of 8 NHL games while getting passed on the prospect chart by quite a few players in the system.
I’m not arguing with your rational. All I’m saying is pretty much every pick and prospect from Montreal (aside from Reinbacher) is available for the right fit but there’s a cost acquisition to those players and sometimes it just isn’t worth it in terms of value/assets.

For example, if your ask for Barzal is two first, Hage + a roster player then it’s just not worth it anymore for Montreal for the same reasons that Mailloux and a first isn’t worth it for NYI to move Barzal.
 
I’m not arguing with your rational. All I’m saying is pretty much every pick and prospect from Montreal (aside from Reinbacher) is available for the right fit but there’s a cost acquisition to those players and sometimes it just isn’t worth it in terms of value/assets.

For example, if your ask for Barzal is two first, Hage + a roster player then it’s just not worth it anymore for Montreal for the same reasons that Mailloux and a first isn’t worth it for NYI to move Barzal.
I’m not saying offer up 2 1sts, Hage and someone else to get Barzal but to get a guy in that 25-28 range who fits into the window, it’s going to hurt. Teams don’t give up players like that unless they’re damaged goods (I.e. Laine). Realistically Kent Hughes should look at what GMJB did in Tampa when it comes to acquiring guys and go from there. Montreal has the pieces to make moves for upgrades but it seems like too much of the fanbase is clinging onto the fact that the rebuild needs a year more instead of realizing ok we made it in and saw what it takes, what adjustments do we need to go even further.
Plus most teams aren’t going to want to move core pieces under contract for pure futures unless one piece is a sure thing (top 3 D or true top 6 tracking) to help the team towards the future. Looking at Rantanen to Dallas, Stankoven is that young top 6 piece that most teams are after and next to no one really gives up. That’s basically what it’ll take (plus pieces) from some teams to get that 1/2C in the age range.

Mailloux isn’t even worth it for the Isles to move Horvat but thats besides the point. He’s giving me Samuel Bolduc vibes and Bolduc’s game fell off a cliff after Roy stepped in essentially.
 
I wonder if he got into his old medication problems again.
It’s just a really sad situation. Beyond being a legit superstar talent he’s incredibly charismatic and witty, the type of personality every team loves to have around and every league would kill to be able to market.

Hope he’s able to get it together, seems like maybe taking some time away from hockey could be for the best.
 
Only two guys I would engage on trading for are Dobson and Horvat. Barzal skating and skill is very nice but the Habs need a different type of center IMO.

Horvat is more of a finisher . He needs someone to drive the play . Before the isles traded for him I thought he was more well rounded . He is still very good for us . The Nucks traded him at the exact right time he was at his statistical peak . If you have a puck handling wing to drive play at set him up for a one timer he would be a nice fit .
 
I’m not arguing with your rational. All I’m saying is pretty much every pick and prospect from Montreal (aside from Reinbacher) is available for the right fit but there’s a cost acquisition to those players and sometimes it just isn’t worth it in terms of value/assets.

For example, if your ask for Barzal is two first, Hage + a roster player then it’s just not worth it anymore for Montreal for the same reasons that Mailloux and a first isn’t worth it for NYI to move Barzal.
See, I'm on the side of - as an outsider - if you can get a prime aged, locked down, star level C for futures, it's worth an overpayment.

MAYBE 2x1st, Hage, Roster Guy (call him Newhook) here is an overpayment but 1st, Hage, Newhook for Barzal and an undesirable contract... that really launches an already good Habs team forward.
 
I’m not saying offer up 2 1sts, Hage and someone else to get Barzal but to get a guy in that 25-28 range who fits into the window, it’s going to hurt. Teams don’t give up players like that unless they’re damaged goods (I.e. Laine). Realistically Kent Hughes should look at what GMJB did in Tampa when it comes to acquiring guys and go from there. Montreal has the pieces to make moves for upgrades but it seems like too much of the fanbase is clinging onto the fact that the rebuild needs a year more instead of realizing ok we made it in and saw what it takes, what adjustments do we need to go even further.
Plus most teams aren’t going to want to move core pieces under contract for pure futures unless one piece is a sure thing (top 3 D or true top 6 tracking) to help the team towards the future. Looking at Rantanen to Dallas, Stankoven is that young top 6 piece that most teams are after and next to no one really gives up. That’s basically what it’ll take (plus pieces) from some teams to get that 1/2C in the age range.

Mailloux isn’t even worth it for the Isles to move Horvat but thats besides the point. He’s giving me Samuel Bolduc vibes and Bolduc’s game fell off a cliff after Roy stepped in essentially.
It's not that the rebuild needs another year, it's simply that the cost acquisition needs to make sense. I understand that you have to pay to play and if Montreal is serious about acquiring a 2C they need to pony up. All I'm saying is just because we have a need at 2C does not mean we have to empty the bank either.

I'm also very aware that no team wants to trade their high end C. If a situation arise where one is available and the price is reasonable then yes, Montreal should and will jump on it. The idea that Montreal NEED to make that trade now (this summer) at any cost is plain stupid though. If there's nothing out there, the worst thing you can do is to force a trade.

That being said, all hands on deck. Everyone and everything is available except Suzuki, Caufield, Slafkovsky, Demidov, Guhle, Hutson and Reinbacher if the fit is right for us.

See, I'm on the side - as an outsider - you can get a prime aged, locked down, star level C for futures, it's worth an overpayment.

MAYBE 2x1st, Hage, Roster Guy (call him Newhook) here is an overpayment but 1st, Hage, Newhook for Barzal and an undesirable contract... that really launches an already good Habs team forward.
I would have no issue moving that package for Barzal. I would have an issue if a long term cap dump was attached to Barzal to finalize that trade. Not that it matters much anyway because if NYI move Barzal, they are entering at best a retool and most likely a rebuild so those undesirable contracts are not an issue for NYI anymore since they won't need that cap space and will need warm bodies/veteran to eat difficult minutes to pave the way for the kids.
 
See, I'm on the side of - as an outsider - if you can get a prime aged, locked down, star level C for futures, it's worth an overpayment.

MAYBE 2x1st, Hage, Roster Guy (call him Newhook) here is an overpayment but 1st, Hage, Newhook for Barzal and an undesirable contract... that really launches an already good Habs team forward.
Cant be Barzal.

Habs need a lefty 2C. They are loaded with righties, but I would agree to overpay for a star level guy (within reason)
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Don Hughes
Vancouver traded 2C Horvat and now 2.5 years later they are desperately looking for a...2C. Good 2C's are really rare and expensive. If you don't like the price then lower your 2C target. Others are available for a cheaper price.
 
Grouping those together shows how little you know of the Habs player values.
None of the above are useful pieces in any sort of way. 2 are cap dumps and the other is a career minor leaguer. Aka none of them have value and in the case of Laine, it’s negative value due to his absurdly high cap hit.
 
It's not that the rebuild needs another year, it's simply that the cost acquisition needs to make sense. I understand that you have to pay to play and if Montreal is serious about acquiring a 2C they need to pony up. All I'm saying is just because we have a need at 2C does not mean we have to empty the bank either.

I'm also very aware that no team wants to trade their high end C. If a situation arise where one is available and the price is reasonable then yes, Montreal should and will jump on it. The idea that Montreal NEED to make that trade now (this summer) at any cost is plain stupid though. If there's nothing out there, the worst thing you can do is to force a trade.

That being said, all hands on deck. Everyone and everything is available except Suzuki, Caufield, Slafkovsky, Demidov, Guhle, Hutson and Reinbacher if the fit is right for us.
Ultimately the 2C will involve an overpayment in terms of quality (not quantity) unless you want a player who’s more of an unproven commodity or someone towards the end of their career age wise that can be a short term stop gap. Ultimately a guy like Brock Nelson would fit the role but I highly doubt he wants to play in MTL and he turned down a 3 year from Lou which forced the trade. He wants more term and at his age that’s a tough ask.
The younger (25-28) quality 2C price will be more then Montreal will ideally want to pay and in some cases way too high. Teams just don’t part with players like that outside of the trade deadline or for a substantial upgrade in both the short and long term.

Back to the Colorado and Carolina trade. It was Rantanen and a low end prospect for Necas, Drury, 2nd and a 4th. That’s like Montreal giving up Caufield, Owen Beck and picks for Rantanen (with contract uncertainty). Would they do something like that? I’m not really sure.

I didn’t bring up Reinbacher because he wasn’t on the current roster. I went based on who was on the ice for the playoffs. Ultimately he steps in next year and replaces someone in the current lineup.
 
None of the above are useful pieces in any sort of way. 2 are cap dumps and the other is a career minor leaguer. Aka none of them have value and in the case of Laine, it’s negative value due to his absurdly high cap hit.
Laine has negative value.

Mesar has very little value, but some GM might take him as a longshot, if their AHL team has room to try and make him into something.

Matheson is a 25 minute top 4 D man. You might not like him for some reason, and he might fill a need on your team, but the guy has value. A team with issues signing UFAs might want to bring him in for a while so both parties can decide if he's a fit and wants to extend.
 
Ultimately the 2C will involve an overpayment

Back to the Colorado and Carolina trade. It was Rantanen and a low end prospect for Necas, Drury, 2nd and a 4th. That’s like Montreal giving up Caufield, Owen Beck and picks for Rantanen (with contract uncertainty).
Terribe take. Caufield has a long term contract, Necas was what, a year from being a UFA and unable to reach a deal ? That has an effect on his value.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad