Value of: A 2nd line center to Montreal.

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server

GrandmaCookie

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
1,645
1,847
116
Montreal seems to distance itself from bottom dwellers and if they don’t make the playoff this season, you have to think with the arrival of Demidov most likely next season they will want to make a push to get a 2nd line C for him, and to improve the offense to get to the next level (playoff bounds).

Now that Dach has had a season ending injury again and even before, was a big question mark at 2C, the need seem even more pressing.

By 2C, I’m looking at center that can produce around 50 points in a secondary role, not necessarily bonafide 2C that can play 1C too. Just your regular top 6 center.

Pieces available would be prospects (not named Demidov, Reinbacher, Fowler), picks, and all NHLers not named Suzuki, Caufield, Slafkovsky, Guhle or Hutson.

I know lots of Montreal fans won’t agree, but for the right fit I think Michael Hage could be available (for a 2C that fits our window in his mid 20s).

For older C (30+), combination of NHLers, B type of prospects and our picks (including 1st rounder) are still on the table, but not Hage.

Open to all kinds of NHL 2C really, just highlight what yours are available and your ask.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Stop gaps are all that’s going to be available for the players and pieces you listed.
So Hage is a legitimate 2C or even higher prospect in your saying, but the only thing we are going to get from him is stop gap? How does that even make sense?
 
ROR would be a decent pick up.

If Vegas don't have a deep run, they'll likely make some moves and someone like Nicolas Roy might be a cheap option. He's $3m which is probably more than Vegas want to pay for a 3C on their team. Maybe William Karlsson is available in that scenario also.
 
Montreal seems to distance itself from bottom dwellers and if they don’t make the playoff this season, you have to think with the arrival of Demidov most likely next season they will want to make a push to get a 2nd line C for him, and to improve the offense to get to the next level (playoff bounds).

Now that Dach has had a season ending injury again and even before, was a big question mark at 2C, the need seem even more pressing.

By 2C, I’m looking at center that can produce around 50 points in a secondary role, not necessarily bonafide 2C that can play 1C too. Just your regular top 6 center.

Pieces available would be prospects (not named Demidov, Reinbacher, Fowler), picks, and all NHLers not named Suzuki, Caufield, Slafkovsky, Guhle or Hutson.

I know lots of Montreal fans won’t agree, but for the right fit I think Michael Hage could be available (for a 2C that fits our window in his mid 20s).

For older C (30+), combination of NHLers, B type of prospects and our picks (including 1st rounder) are still on the table, but not Hage.

Open to all kinds of NHL 2C really, just highlight what yours are available and your ask.

Thank you.
I'm not really interested in parting with Hage. He's had a Big 10 ROTY-caliber season. Give him one more year at Michigan and see where he is.

Teams aren't lining up to part with 2Cs in their mid 20s and producing. Do you offer sheet Marco Rossi?

If they walk away from Dach, I think a veteran stop gap makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gravity
I'm not really interested in parting with Hage. He's had a Big 10 ROTY-caliber season. Give him one more year at Michigan and see where he is.

Teams aren't lining up to part with 2Cs in their mid 20s and producing. Do you offer sheet Marco Rossi?

If they walk away from Dach, I think a veteran stop gap makes sense.
Hence why I suggest Hage to entice teams in parting with a younger 2C.

Keep him then yes older C are likely the realistic option left. Still would like to see what followers of other teams would say is available on their side rather than just speculate on Habs side.
 
So Hage is a legitimate 2C or even higher prospect in your saying, but the only thing we are going to get from him is stop gap? How does that even make sense?
Because he’s not sure thing. From a trade value standpoint, the bird in hand is worth more. Make sense yet?
 
My guess would be HuGo pulls out all the stops to try and sign Bennett. Failing that, we probably move something that hurts to go get someone people aren't thinking of as available right now. I think they see solidifying the 2C as the biggest hurdle remaining to the team taking a big step forward.
 
Hence why I suggest Hage to entice teams in parting with a younger 2C.

Keep him then yes older C are likely the realistic option left. Still would like to see what followers of other teams would say is available on their side rather than just speculate on Habs side.
Why would any team trade a young 2C for a prospect they hope eventually becomes that? It’s nonsensical.
 
Because he’s not sure thing. From a trade value standpoint, the bird in hand is worth more. Make sense yet?
I agree for type B prospect like Roy and Mailloux. For piece like Hage, type A prospect, I think they hold more value and could interest a team willing to move a 2C in his 20s if added with picks and NHLers ( see for example ROR when traded to St Louis).
 
Why would any team trade a young 2C for a prospect they hope eventually becomes that? It’s nonsensical.
Buffalo traded OReilly for a mix of 1st, prospect Tage Thompson, and average NHL ers.

More recently, Bo Horvat was traded in 2023 for first, prospect and beauvillier.

Both were in their late 20s at the time.

Even Eichel is an example to an extend, Tuch compensating for Eichel being a first C.

My point if with type A prospect like Hage, 1st rounder and NHLers like Newhook, you might pull something different than for a package of B prospect and other type of picks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lockin17
Hence why I suggest Hage to entice teams in parting with a younger 2C.

Keep him then yes older C are likely the realistic option left. Still would like to see what followers of other teams would say is available on their side rather than just speculate on Habs side.
I understand your logic, I just don't think teams will line up to part with a C that is in the midst of the age of our core group. Those that might are going to want 3 high end pieces. I would prefer to wait a year on Hage, chart his growth, and then make a decision about his potential and future in the organization.
 
Buffalo traded OReilly for a mix of 1st, prospect Tage Thompson, and average NHL ers.

More recently, Bo Horvat was traded in 2023 for first, prospect and beauvillier.

Both were in their late 20s at the time.
O’Reilly forced his way out of Buffalo, so that one is not really applicable.

Same situation with Horvat, iirc.

Also, for a team in the middle of a rebuild, I don’t think trading a prospect like Hage plus a bunch of other assets for a player in their late 20s is a good idea.

And like I said, you aren’t going to get a younger established 2C for the players and pieces mentioned.
 
O’Reilly forced his way out of Buffalo, so that one is not really applicable.

Same situation with Horvat, iirc.

Also, for a team in the middle of a rebuild, I don’t think trading a prospect like Hage plus a bunch of other assets for a player in their late 20s is a good idea.

And like I said, you aren’t going to get a younger established 2C for the players and pieces mentioned.

I don't think the Habs are middle of a rebuild any more. 1 point out of a playoff spot. 3 young dmen who for their top 4 (Hutson, Guhle, Reinbacher) + a vet in either Matheson or Carrier.

Top line looks great, Demidov will drive the 2nd. If the Habs get a legit 2C making Laine the worst player in your top 6 once Demidov gets going they're a playoff team almost certainly.

My guess would be HuGo pulls out all the stops to try and sign Bennett. Failing that, we probably move something that hurts to go get someone people aren't thinking of as available right now. I think they see solidifying the 2C as the biggest hurdle remaining to the team taking a big step forward.

I think this is right, Bennett is an ideal "Older" 2c. As the he ages his game is perfectly suited for a 3rd line role once he slows down and can't be a 2C anymore in 5ish years.
 
it's a difficult situation for the habs; teams don't readily part with young top 6 C.
Buffalo and ottawa just did - for each other's C.
Apparently buffalo wanted either slafkovsky or Caufield for Cozens which is a lateral move at best for Mtl.
They could probably trade for Zegras but can he even play C?
Do they move Demidov to C?
They might try and trade for a placeholder, but Hage is absolutely off the table because that C would be holding place until he's ready.
I can see them offering Marner, Tavares or Bennett lots and lots of money, but 0 guarantee any would sign in Montreal.
 
My guess would be HuGo pulls out all the stops to try and sign Bennett. Failing that, we probably move something that hurts to go get someone people aren't thinking of as available right now. I think they see solidifying the 2C as the biggest hurdle remaining to the team taking a big step forward.
I love Bennett's game and think he'd be an amazing 2C on the Habs right now, but he will require an overpay (8-9M+) and a 6-7 year commitment to land him in FA. Not to mention that his game causes a lot of wear and tear to his body, and I'd guess he'll be the new Gallagher in the back end of his long-term deal.

TLDR: Excellent short-term fit, but there is a high probability that the back end of his long-term contract hurts the team's competitive window.
 

Ad

Ad