84-0

[Neil Patrick Harris]

And just got one:

 

[Jocke1]

Here's a challenge. How about trying to get teams together by country.
It's not easy. I just spent way too much time tonight doing my best to get some countries together. I managed to do it with:

Spoiler: CANADA

Spoiler: USA

Spoiler: SWEDEN

There's definitely a better Swedish team in there but its real hard when you have five done and one to go and the options run out.

I'd imagine Finland, Russia and Czechia are equally as hard to get a complete roster for.

How about an all-Quebec born team? That's has to be very difficult to nail.

Or how about a Canadian team with each of the six players all representing a different province

 

[CauZuki]

 

[Calvin Bale]

Weber/Seider would be such a punishing pairing. McLean unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired compared to some of the names out there.

 

[Johnny Concussion]

Here's a challenge. How about trying to get teams together by country.
It's not easy. I just spent way too much time tonight doing my best to get some countries together. I managed to do it with:

Spoiler: CANADA

View attachment 1249879

Spoiler: USA

View attachment 1249883

Spoiler: SWEDEN

View attachment 1249884

There's definitely a better Swedish team in there but its real hard when you have five done and one to go and the options run out.

I'd imagine Finland, Russia and Czechia are equally as hard to get a complete roster for.

How about an all-Quebec born team? That's has to be very difficult to nail.

Or how about a Canadian team with each of the six players all representing a different province

My team Canada made quick. Gonna keep going on this. I love the idea.

EDIT: SO CLOSE!

 

[CRDragon]

 

[TheRumble]

IMO the bigger challenge is trying to build as bad of a team as possible. Everyone here is building 70+ win teams with relatively little effort or thought needed.

 

[Damien]

 

[Johnny Concussion]

IMO the bigger challenge is trying to build as bad of a team as possible. Everyone here is building 70+ win teams with relatively little effort or thought needed.

I think the lowest I've seen in the thread is 11 wins. I've gotten to 18.

 

[Damien]

 

[Bondurant]

View attachment 1249596

This must be one of the best teams to not have managed to get the 84-0 record.

98-94, crazy scores, and I didn't get it.

Yeah, I don't understand the algorithm. Your team is better than my 84-0 team. It's probably the best one on paper that has been shared.

 

[tarheelhockey]

The real question is whether anyone can go 0-84

 

[Gregor Samsa]

Best I was able to get in like 10 attempts. This is totally luck based and almost like gambling. Salming was a great defenseman but I just needed that last pick to have a bit more oomph

 

[EK392000]

 

[Dead Coyote]

Ain't no way this team isn't perfect. Only semi weak point is Sorokin.

 

[AKL]

My previous lowest was 19, then 12 out of nowhere

 

[FlappyGiraffe]

 

[bh53]

View attachment 1249496

The secret to the perfect team is always Double Bourque.

Double Bourque strikes again

 

[Ducks in a row]

 

[Chuck Norris Trophy]

Stuck in 83-1. This is addictive.

 

[bh53]

Been trying for a worst record and 25 minutes later the best I could do is 10-68-6

 

[nowhereman]

The best I could get before giving up....

 

[Oddbob]

Kind of neat, though how does it determine how well the teams do?

 

[Oddbob]

Been trying for a worst record and 25 minutes later the best I could do is 10-68-6View attachment 1249975

So far 37 wins is the lowest I have seen. I was trying to do the same thing.

 

[Johnny Concussion]

Been trying for a worst record and 25 minutes later the best I could do is 10-68-6View attachment 1249975

10 wins is the lowest so far. That's awesome.