Not many guys can say they took Jack Hughes and Cale Makar's souls in the same week.
Anytime Makar is embarrassed it’s a good day. lol
Not many guys can say they took Jack Hughes and Cale Makar's souls in the same week.
This has always been a fun myth that I wouldn't hate to see debunked. I remember Hank having AT WORST some slow starts to the season. Just doing a quick glance (mostly because I don't feel like doing a deep dive) Hank's sv% going by monthly splits was never below the league average in his career (.911). He certainly never gave up the level of stinkers Shesterkin does in his prime years.
View attachment 961441
God, I'm gonna be 43 when Igor's contract is up.
Can I just die?
It
hitting the net would be a good start. I feel like Laffy has missed a few open nets
The teams shooting talent is average to subpar imo
It
hitting the net would be a good start. I feel like Laffy has missed a few open nets
The teams shooting talent is average to subpar imo
The standard for him is higher than "well it wasn't really his fault."Because if Quick played in that game, we don't even get a point. I really didn't even think any of the goals Shesterkin gave up were soft. Kelly had about 40 feet a room on the first one, 2nd was a net mouth play with Lindgren on the ice and the OT goal was 3 on 3 pond hockey.
I don't know too many toddlers that go to those UNCE UNCE UNCE UNCE UNCE UNCE shows.Doesn't she already see him on the big screen at his concerts?
Surely Hank never allowed a softy - that's why he has all these Vesina's
The standard for him is higher than "well it wasn't really his fault."
I expect him to singlehandedly win games at his salary.
Not many guys can say they took Jack Hughes and Cale Makar's souls in the same week.
Sam Carrick being just a guy who’s capable of showing up the best players on earth for no particular reason is such a funny bit.
He's going to be held to that standard each and every year. He hasn't even been a plus this year. He's 15th in save percentage.He's singlehandedly won a shit-ton on his 5x5.875 salary that he's currently getting paid. That just doesnt matter now because people get in their feels after losses? Panarin's rate of singlehandedly winning games on his 11.6 million dollar salary is much harder to find.
Oh joy, we're paying him $11.5m to keep us in series we should be swept in.The regular season really means jack shit when it comes to goaltending unless you're a bubble team. What matters is whether Shesty continues to be excellent in the playoffs. So far he's run a .928 there as compared to a .919 in the reg.
There's no reason to assume that his trends will continue, but if he finishes his contract with a .910 in the regular season and a .930 in the potseason, so be it.
He's going to be held to that standard each and every year. He hasn't even been a plus this year. He's 15th in save percentage.
I'm going to be 42 when the contract kicks in... Please save me a bullet.God, I'm gonna be 43 when Igor's contract is up.
Can I just die?
Dude, where's Makar?Anytime Makar is embarrassed it’s a good day. lol
Still see zero justification for Igor getting almost 50% more than Saros.
It's an atrocious and unjustifiable contract.
Kuemper was playing bad when they won. The Avalanche won the Cup with a GSAA during the tournament that would make Mike Dunham blush.Doesn't the team in front of him suck? Knock Igor all you want idc it's not about him it's just that Im trying to follow the bouncing ball on the "goalies dont matter" stuff and it's not adding up. It definitely matters in the playoffs because you can't win a Cup with a bad goalie. Kuemper and Murray and Binnington might be bad goalies now but they weren't playing bad when they won.
This dude's agent came out and said he wanted to reset the market for goalies.
Ok, reset my expectations for goalies like Esposito, Hasek, Roy, and Lundqvist did.
Anything short of generational is disappointing now. You said it, Igor. You signed up for it.
Kuemper was playing bad when they won. The Avalanche won the Cup with a GSAA during the tournament that would make Mike Dunham blush.
That's an exception. There's always exceptions. The 2019 Blues won the Cup being good at absolutely f***ing nothing. It's not repeatable.
What is pretty repeatable is slapdash goalies being good enough if they have Hall of Fame centers in front of them.
You made the point that "we have to win this way because we don't have the Hall of Fame center." No. You need the Hall of Fame center. Period. Exclamation point. Umlaut.
We can have the conversation of "how much do we spend on a goalie?" after we formed the core that we're going to war with. Right now, Igor is a giant cap hindrance that's off-schedule from where the rest of the team is at this point.
People bring up Bobrovsky, but Barkov was coming off of a 96 point season when they signed him. They already had their piece. Igor doesn't fit any kind of window, and I think there was perhaps an opportunity to get assets for him.
There is no "we have to win this way." There is no other way. You need Hall of Fame talent up front. I know you want to turn it around quickly and that would be wonderful, but the only real way we're doing that is to acquire Hall of Fame forwards quickly.