GDT: 7pm: Hawk tuah win?

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,780
32,498
The awesome thing about Lehner for a 1 is that it was the first example of Harrington blaming moves he didn’t like on analytics. As if any analytics person would have advocated trading that 1 for an unproven goalie. Or any goalie that wasn’t like…one of four or five guys in the league. Let us know early that he would blame analytics for anything that was bad. A pattern he continues to this day.

He gets paid to write about hockey. Isn’t it amazing? Never seen someone as uninterested in learning about what he covers than him. Does no prospect work. Gloats about not following the Amerks. Understand nothing about the game. And he isn’t even a decent writer. For as much as Jerry Sullivan could be up his own ass…he was a fine writer. Harrington is shit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jc17

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
37,301
13,881
Meh, his career save percentage is .917 over 12 seasons and he was pretty consistent (didn't really have a bad season). That is very good, and worth a 21st overall pick.

The problem is he was a head case (like other Murray trades). It's like Murray thought if you acquired enough locker room cancers they would cancel each other out.

Yes but at time of trade he hadn't done anything to warrant a 1st pick.

It was bad value at time of trade.

Like ROR trade... was a horrible return at time of trade...we just got lucky that Thompson developed into something
 

MOGlLNY

Registered User
Jan 5, 2008
12,561
13,088
Here comes the goon squad. If they are going to run Kulich, then return the favor with Bedard.
Hardly say Foligno ran him. That's a great hit by a vet taking advantage of a rookie who was too high up and wasn't ready for it.

that should be a suspension.
lmao come on dude not even close that's an awesome hit.
 

jc17

Registered User
Jun 14, 2013
11,623
8,445
The awesome thing about Lehner for a 1 is that it was the first example of Harrington blaming moves he didn’t like on analytics. As if any analytics person would have advocated trading that 1 for an unproven goalie. Or any goalie that wasn’t like…one of four or five guys in the league. Let us know early that he would blame analytics for anything that was bad. A pattern he continues to this day.

He gets paid to write about hockey. Isn’t it amazing? Never seen someone as uninterested in learning about what he covers than him. Does no prospect work. Gloats about not following the Amerks. Understand nothing about the game. And he isn’t even a decent writer. For as much as Jerry Sullivan could be up his own ass…he was a fine writer. Harrington is shit.
Legitimately made me upset to think about, particularly when job hunting, that he gets paid full time to write about this team, given the content he comes up with
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,780
32,498
Good hit by Foligno in that it was clean. But it also resulted in a 2 on 1 . Lucky it was Krebs with the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ralonzo

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad