And that happens, we will see Dark Ages V2.0, although some around here seem to want that.
Why does it have to be dark ages v2? Why can't it just be a bottom out and rebuild?
And that happens, we will see Dark Ages V2.0, although some around here seem to want that.
Kings go down two goals, dominate play, tie it, and win in OT. Rangers go down a goal, proceed to suck even more.
Not a fun time being a Rangers fan :-/
Why does it have to be dark ages v2? Why can't it just be a bottom out and rebuild?
Because we're stuck with Girardi and Staal for several more years afterwards, and I doubt we'd be able to move them. Either that, or we buy them out, but would still be on the hook for a ton of money.
I don't think it'll be dark ages per se, but it'll be a period of time where we suck majorly, a la the Devils.
Kings go down two goals, dominate play, tie it, and win in OT. Rangers go down a goal, proceed to suck even more.
Why does it have to be dark ages v2? Why can't it just be a bottom out and rebuild?
I think the solution is getting rid of bad hockey players and getting better ones.
Because name one team that has recently "bottomed out" and became competitive in two years?
The tank strategy is completely ignorant.
Zuke looks like he wants to be somewhere else, he's been the pits lately...
Got women's curling on in the background, attention is rapidly wavering.I can support bad hockey players who give it everything they've got. I CANNOT support talented hockey players who simply look like they don't give half a ****.
I can support bad hockey players who give it everything they've got. I CANNOT support talented hockey players who simply look like they don't give half a ****.
The Pittsburgh Penguins.
Because name one team that has recently "bottomed out" and became competitive in two years?
The tank strategy is completely ignorant.