It's any good organization's prerogative to assess the risk, and the reward, of any player. Tyler Kleven with his poor passing and puck skills presents significant risk. Is his reward worth it? Who knows but is he really safer than a skilled player with smaller size? I'd say not really.
Defaulting to size and character is how you litter your team with Lazars and Cowens. You need to try to get players that COULD end up stars with some picks. And I'm not talking about unrated goalies being picked in the third round. If you're picking players who are going to "safely" be mediocre then you're going to be left behind.
I see the rationale but kinda unfair to say in Cowen's case. I don't know if you were following NHL drafts closely back then but Cowen at the beginning of the season was considered in the same sentence as Victor Hedman... and only dropped to #9 because of his draft year injury (unfortunately for us in hindsight). Even after his injuries, he was still considered among the best D-men of the draft (just after Hedman and OEL)
Maybe scouting wasn't as good as it is today but it's "only"11 years ago, it was still already pretty good
https://thehockeywriters.com/11-jared-cowen-–-the-hockey-spy’s-2009-nhl-entry-draft-rankings/
Risk-Reward Analysis: Risk = 2.5/5 Reward = 5/5
NHL Potential: Top 2 shutdown defensive defenseman with offensive upside
Fantasy Hockey Potential: Offensive = 6.5/10 Defensive = 9/10
Other Rankings:
- ISS: 7
- CSB: 9-NA
- TSN: 11
- THN: 4
Injuries easily derail player careers, could happen to anybody. Mental and physical ability to recover from injuries is almost impossible to scout unless it just happened.
I agree on principle though, but I don't think it would be accurate to say for this draft. Still have a lot of research to do but don't see Stuetzle, Sanderson, Greig and Jarventie fitting that bill. Even Sokolov
Really don't see the rationale behind this goalie pick though... I mean, there isn't that many jobs at that position. Yes you can develop them longer but it sounds like overkill
- Matt Murray
- Joey Daccord
- Mads Sogaard
- Kevin Mandolese
- Filip Gustvasson
- Marcus Hogberg
I'm high on Daccord and Sogaard. Mandolese as well, I think he will get there. Not as high on Gustavsson but it wouldn't be surprising to see him make it with his skillset and pedigree. Hogberg looks like a back-up at the very least and Matt Murray is only 26 y/o, well accomplished goalie already
So what is the plan, there is only 2 jobs at the NHL level. Do we plan to change our goalies every 3-4 years max?