GDT: #46 | Avalanche at Flyers | January 20, 2024 | 1:00 PM Afternoon Time | NHL Network, NBCSP

[CanadianFlyer88]

Sheltering Risto has helped, but he still shows his poor IQ every game.

 

[CanadianFlyer88]

That Tippett blind pass is what he needs to cut out of his game. Wasted a good chance at zone time there...


And indirectly leads to a goal against off of an icing. Damn.

Nice double deflection.

That's not a kicking motion.

 

[ellja3]

What? That goal stood?

 

[JojoTheWhale]

When you go a long time between these games, it smacks you in the face how awful these broadcasts are. Jackson could be fine if he wanted to be. He just doesn’t.

 

[BillDineen]

That is a kick.

 

[CanadianFlyer88]

Oh my god, what a steal and pass by Frost.

Parable.

 

[BigToe]

Ughh. Gotta finish those.

 

[PDX Flyer]

That is a kick! And damn Farabee!

 

[bennysflyers16]

How the f*** can a professional hockey player miss that ????

 

[bobbythebrain]

Farapee

 

[CanadianFlyer88]

When you go a long time between these games, it smacks you in the face how awful these broadcasts are. Jackson could be fine if he wanted to be. He just doesn’t.

I'm not sure he can. He's a whiny company man now.

Once you start down the dark path, it will forever dominate your destiny. So said a wise fictional character.

 

[bennysflyers16]

This feels like a game we are gonna dominate and lose. Avs have barely had the puck.

And these Avs announcers are fantastic so far.

 

[ponder719]

I can believe that the Colorado goal should stand because the rule specifically looks for the puck to be "propelled" by the kick. O'Connor didn't generate any momentum towards the net, he just redirected the puck. Of course, they've called it the other way before, because refs in all sports are inconsistent, incompetent garbage, but I can see a letter of the law argument for that one.

 

[3mFlyers]

Jesus. Skate in the air. Directed to goal. Believe that is the definition of a kick.

 

[bennysflyers16]

Frost and Drysdale are electric.

Drysdale looks like he may have the fattest pumpkin in the world, helmet barely fits.

 

[bennysflyers16]

Avs tackle better than the eagles.

2 clear penalties

 

[saophim]

Hopefully Drysdale takes over QB for PP1 soon..

 

[kudymen]

Tuning in, seeing actually likeable Dmen wearing 8 and 9 is hilarious after the past... hm... six seven years?

 

[Captain Dave Poulin]

Frost and Drysdale are electric.

Drysdale looks like he may have the fattest pumpkin in the world, helmet barely fits.

Can you imagine Trevor Lawrence wearing a hockey helmet?

 

[bennysflyers16]

How are we not scoring.

 

[ponder719]

Jesus. Skate in the air. Directed to goal. Believe that is the definition of a kick.

It'd be helpful for us if that was all that was required, but the definition specifically mentions propulsion towards the net. Since O'Connor didn't give the puck forward momentum towards the net, it probably doesn't meet that criterion.

37.4 Distinct Kicking Motion – Plays that involve a puck entering the net
as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO
GOAL. A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is
one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has
deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of his foot or skate and
the puck subsequently enters the net. A goal cannot be scored on a
play where an attacking Player propels the puck with his skate into the
net (even by means of a subsequent deflection off of another Player)
using a “distinct kicking motion.” A goal also cannot be scored on a
play where an attacking Player kicks any equipment (stick, glove,
helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick,
causing the puck to cross the goal line. A puck that deflects into the
net off an attacking Player’s skate who does not use a “distinct kicking
motion” shall be ruled a GOAL. A puck that is directed into the net by
an attacking Players’ skate shall also be ruled a GOAL, as long
as no “distinct kicking motion” is evident. (See also Rule 49.2)

 

[Captain Dave Poulin]

@CanadianFlyer88 another blind tomato pass.

 

[CanadianFlyer88]

Damn. Couts with a great chance while three Avs are draped on him. Then has a beauty feed that TK buries if he could have one timed it...

 

[CanadianFlyer88]

It'd be helpful for us if that was all that was required, but the definition specifically mentions propulsion towards the net. Since O'Connor didn't give the puck forward momentum towards the net, it probably doesn't meet that criterion.

37.4 Distinct Kicking Motion – Plays that involve a puck entering the net
as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO
GOAL. A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is
one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has
deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of his foot or skate and
the puck subsequently enters the net. A goal cannot be scored on a
play where an attacking Player propels the puck with his skate into the
net (even by means of a subsequent deflection off of another Player)
using a “distinct kicking motion.” A goal also cannot be scored on a
play where an attacking Player kicks any equipment (stick, glove,
helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick,
causing the puck to cross the goal line. A puck that deflects into the
net off an attacking Player’s skate who does not use a “distinct kicking
motion” shall be ruled a GOAL. A puck that is directed into the net by
an attacking Players’ skate shall also be ruled a GOAL, as long
as no “distinct kicking motion” is evident. (See also Rule 49.2)

Propelled and deflected are not the same.

That should be a goal 100% of the time.

 

[kudymen]

Also, that IBX logo needs to go F itself