2 - 2 after 2 ....... could be worse .....
Getting old fast.
Hank should have had that last goal but dont kid your selfs, without Hank this game would be over by now.
Minus the one soft goal, Lundqvist's played well.
Positionally, there should be no room there at all. I'm not getting bent out of shape, though. He's made some very good saves otherwise.Bolligs goal was good shot, didn't it go in just barely touching the post ?
That said, I agree, Hank should get that one. Im glad he didnt.
What, do you not watch NHL Tonight? Goalies give up goals all the time, nothing is weak to give up.
I had enough of your excuses and trying to sound like your billy smith.. You work for hank at his camps and will never say a bad about him. The goal was horrible cup winning goalies make that save.. Eddie O nails it he lost his net and angle .. He has been off all season and that's the perfect example
Not so bad against the frigging Hawks.
Just can't take so much time off. They finished the second off pretty good.
I call every goal like I see it. If it's a soft goal, i'll call it as such. Henrik gives up soft goals from time to time just like every other goalie in the league. Want an example? Watch this video below. By far, the softest goal Hank has let up all year.
http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?id=2013020265-576-h
The issue is, so many people here don't understand what a soft goal is. They think every goal scored should absolutely have been stopped by the goalie.
It's easy to say that sitting on your couch at home when you've never experienced pucks flying at yourself at 100mph. Puck's sometimes find holes and beat you. Shooters are talented, and at the NHL level even more so.