HF Habs: 4 Nations Face-Off: Rosters announced

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,381
7,732
They might be looking for a 4th line of players with more of a defense/energy/physical profile.

Suzuki is more cerebral, offense, clutch, leadership. They have that already. NS, while smart defensively, is not gonna be a physical challenge for opponents.
 

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,293
23,673
Victoriaville
Marchand is on the team and he absolutely sucks this year. They're going to play favorites per usual. Suzuki isn't one of those.

I believe Wilson is on the team to counter the Tkachuk brothers.

Too bad there isn't an All Star game as I'm pretty sure Caufield would have went to his 1st one. I don’t expect CC to make it either despite being the highest scoring American.

Oh well, they all get 2 weeks off now & can go have some fun in the sun. You know someone is getting injured in this tournament and if they don't it's probably because they're All Star quality games.
I don’t think Marchand would have made team if he wasn’t already name.

Wilson could make it yes as a checking energy guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,137
45,474
I don't think any of them made it. I expect Robert Thomas to have made it. The organizers will pick their guys. Thomas is one. Plus has a Stanley Cup.
To be fair he was a passenger on that Cup run. But Suzuki could be a RW with Thomas at centre. I think they’d surprise a lot of people with how much they contribute at both ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Picaroon

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
3,259
1,560
New Brunswick
That’s why I could see them bringing a ROR/Couturier as 13th forward to use on those specific role. They have so many offensive talent in top 9, I think they will bring players that can bring specific things on the 4th line (like Konecny as an energy player).

Do we see Suzuki being use as an energy or defensive player? For me, the answer is no
Well sounds like you were right. Leaving him off will likely be a decision I disagree with. I do think he could make a great defensive line 4 with Konecny, himself and Stone. I'm curious who they think is a better fit. I could see them going off the board with someone like Lowry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,137
45,474
They might be looking for a 4th line of players with more of a defense/energy/physical profile.

Suzuki is more cerebral, offense, clutch, leadership. They have that already. NS, while smart defensively, is not gonna be a physical challenge for opponents.
Yes, Team Canada has always had a knack for inviting bums like Kris Draper and Brendan Morrow
 

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,293
23,673
Victoriaville
And I’d be interested to know what exactly Hagel and Cirelli bring more than Nick other than skating

Like Cirelli’s best offensive season is Nick’s worst. There’s zero reason to have him there
Cirelli is a better defensive player and Hagel is better energy/forechek player

They are building a team not an all star team. They already have their offensive guys
 

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,695
71,022
Toronto


I don't know if Denis said it as a source of info or a belief. I didn't listen to the segment to hear exactly what he said.


Not a surprise with D'Accord unable to play.

It's going to be Binnington, Hill & Montembeault. The only other players even under consideration were D'Accord & Logan Thompson. Every other Canadian goaltender is vomit inducing. Skinner? :biglaugh:
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,137
45,474
Cirelli is a better defensive player and Hagel is better energy/forechek player

They are building a team not an all star team. They already have their offensive guys
Suzuki is good defensively. The difference between him and Cirelli defensively is not half the production. This is Team Canada, there’s no need to sacrifice in one area. You can find players that excel at both. If you tell Suzuki his role is 4th line defensive, he’ll do it better than Cirelli, I have zero doubts about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Leto

Registered User
Feb 16, 2023
1,032
2,202
I mean Team USA took Justin Abdelkader over Phil Kessel in 2014 for the Olympics. Lol They ended up losing 1-0 to Canada in SF. They couldn't come close to scoring.
1733239512946.png


I believe it was the 2026 WC. Phil was there at Sochi.
 

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,695
71,022
Toronto
Bobby Clarke chose the team. It reflected how dumb he was. The 7th leading scorer of the 1997-98 NHL season, Ron Francis, got to stay home. Adam Oates too. Lo and behold, the team couldn’t find a way to score.

I'm sure they figured all they needed was Gretzky. But, he was freaking old at the time. Canada was super arrogant at that time about our quality versus other countries other than the USA. Everyone was catching up quick in the 90s.

They figured they could leave whoever they wanted at home & still win.

At least that team lost to an absolutely epic performance by Hasek. It was a goaltending performance for the ages.

The 2006 team that went to Italy was just pathetic. The Todd Bertuzzi and Kris Draper picks. Ugh. They took no speed with them. Lost 2 games in preliminary round to finish 3rd in Division then lost to Russia in QF. They were awful all the way through.

The US took a terrible team too, finished 4th in their Division and lost in QF to Finland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the valiant effort

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,137
45,474
I'm sure they figured all they needed was Gretzky. But, he was freaking old at the time. Canada was super arrogant at that time about our quality versus other countries other than the USA. Everyone was catching up quick in the 90s.

They figured they could leave whoever they wanted at home & still win.

At least that team lost to an absolutely epic performance by Hasek. It was a goaltending performance for the ages.

The 2006 team that went to Italy was just pathetic. The Todd Bertuzzi and Kris Draper picks. Ugh. They took no speed with them. Lost 2 games in preliminary round to finish 3rd in Division then lost to Russia in QF. They were awful all the way through.

The US took a terrible team too, finished 4th in their Division and lost in QF to Finland.
Weird of them to be arrogant in 1998 when in 1996 they lost pretty handily to the US.

2006 team was a disaster. Somehow Canada’s kryptonite is always Switzerland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,293
23,673
Victoriaville
Suzuki is good defensively. The difference between him and Cirelli defensively is not half the production. This is Team Canada, there’s no need to sacrifice in one area. You can find players that excel at both. If you tell Suzuki his role is 4th line defensive, he’ll do it better than Cirelli, I have zero doubts about that.
There is a massive difference between those 2 defensively though. Suzuki is fine defensively but Cirelli is elite. They already have big offensive weapon that will take all the offensive missions they don’t need Suzuki offence
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,137
45,474
There is a massive difference between those 2 defensively though. Suzuki is fine defensively but Cirelli is elite. They already have big offensive weapon that will take all the offensive missions they don’t need Suzuki offence
Exactly what @MarkovsKnee and I were discussing

“Hey we have Gretzky, why would we need Ron Francis and Adam Oates”
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad