Kiekura
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2013
- 1,007
- 1,098
If Kakko was there, why would Pavel be there?
I didn't say he would be there? I said that If he was dropped from PP1 it would wake him up.
If Kakko was there, why would Pavel be there?
If it is so easy to ascertain what a coach is doing wrong, why is it that fans think they know what is right and professionals can't figure it out?
Too many fans believe it's always the fault of the coach when it's almost without exception about personnel.
Buch is always going to ride shotgun to Panarin and Zibanejad.
Like are people expecting something different? He's very clearly the 3rd best player on that line, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Eventually Kakko is going to take that spot, but pushing Buch down after 4 games seems rash
Shocking he hasn't learned it yet. It's the easiest play to make in hockey.
In North America, yes.
If he's as talented as you say he is, he should have absolutely zero issue learning when and how to occasionally dump a puck into the offensive zone.
If you're used to a different style of hockey all your life it's not that easy. It takes time to change your mindset.
He is going to be there until someone's play overtakes him or his level of play slides below others.Buch is always going to ride shotgun to Panarin and Zibanejad.
And that's totally fine. Let him learn this in Hartford so that when he comes up it's second nature. If he makes a mistake in Hartford fine. If he makes that mistake here, it's much worse. Bad things happen when you don't make the right play in this league. It's the blaming the coach, the management, the complaining they aren't giving him a chance, the threats (real or fake) of him bolting to Russia, that's dumb.
I think people would be okay with Kravtsov in the AHL if we had some depth on the wing. Can anyone really say McKegg, Haley and Smith are better options than Kravtsov?
Of course not, but I would not want Kravsov playing on the 4th line any more than I want Andersson there. And Kravstov clearly needs more development.I think people would be okay with Kravtsov in the AHL if we had some depth on the wing. Can anyone really say McKegg, Haley and Smith are better options than Kravtsov?
Of course not, but I would not want Kravsov playing on the 4th line any more than I want Andersson there. And Kravstov clearly needs more development.
I agree with that and I have always said he should stay in Russia for at least another year.
Not sure what you're saying. Why can't professional coaches figure out what's seemingly obvious to some here?
It would be nice if he could at least show up at 5v5, he has 1 shot attempt. Playing with Panarin and Zibanejad that's pretty sad. And that line as a whole has sucked for the most part. Maybe breaking them up wouldn't be the worst thing in the world especially if they can get Kreider going with Zibanejad.Buch is always going to ride shotgun to Panarin and Zibanejad.
Like are people expecting something different? He's very clearly the 3rd best player on that line, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Eventually Kakko is going to take that spot, but pushing Buch down after 4 games seems rash
I'd like to see Buch bumped off the TEAM if possible. He's a total bum and always has been.It would be nice if he could at least show up at 5v5, he has 1 shot attempt. Playing with Panarin and Zibanejad that's pretty sad. And that line as a whole has sucked for the most part. Maybe breaking them up wouldn't be the worst thing in the world especially if they can get Kreider going with Zibanejad.
But if he's developed those problems playing in Russia, how would spending an extra year there fix them? Playing big mintues, doing the wrong thing is not what's best for his development. Him spending half a season in Hartford, in the grand scheme of things, is miniscule compared to the role he has here with the Rangers moving forward.