Toggle sidebar

GDT: 3/4/2017 Vancouver Canucks @ LA Kings -- 7:00pm PST

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
It's better if they don't make the PO, they barely can beat mediocre teams and the last thing I want to see is Minny stomping on them.
 
Is it bad when your team needs 40 minutes every night before remembering how to play as an effective team? It's all I know following the Kings, perhaps it's another new rule the NHL is trying out.
 
If this team didn't have bad luck, they'd have no luck :laugh:

Get ready for two periods of no Canuck crossing the red line on defense.
 
SlimCharles said:
It's not Bishop's fault homie.
Click to expand...

That shot that hit the post early was was outside the dot. The rebound they scored on was brutal, it was just a pass, not a hard shot. He was cheating on the last goal. Sure, they weren't "terrible" but he's not sharp, put Quick in. They have 4 days off after tonight.
 
Im amazed they put Bishop in net after getting lit up by the Canucks earlier in the year with Tampa. He laid an egg, even put the puck into his own net.
 
HookKing said:
That shot that hit the post early was was outside the dot. The rebound they scored on was brutal, it was just a pass, not a hard shot. He was cheating on the last goal. Sure, they weren't "terrible" but he's not sharp, put Quick in. They have 4 days off after tonight.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't be surprised to see him start the 2nd
 
HookKing said:
That shot that hit the post early was was outside the dot. The rebound they scored on was brutal, it was just a pass, not a hard shot. He was cheating on the last goal. Sure, they weren't "terrible" but he's not sharp, put Quick in. They have 4 days off after tonight.
Click to expand...

The rebound on the first goal was really bad, but you cannot sit here and blame this game on the goalie. Come on...
 
Raccoon Jesus said:
If this team didn't have bad luck, they'd have no luck :laugh:

Get ready for two periods of no Canuck crossing the red line on defense.
Click to expand...

I don't think luck had anything to do with their terrible display of hockey. Even if the Canucks stay back, they have to find a way to get behind their defenders and get pucks on net that cause rebounds, redirects or second and third chances.

This Kings team is way too ****ing passive. Even Jim Fox called them out on that. Zero intensity.
 
Budaj would have done better.

Won't mind if the Nucks sits back and Kings score 3 unanswered goals. Score some goals while tanking is fun.
 
Hey
I am taking the Doughty goal as a good thing.
Remember 2012: Kings scored on Quick every other game
 
SlimCharles said:
The rebound on the first goal was really bad, but you cannot sit here and blame this game on the goalie. Come on...
Click to expand...

I'm not, just saying he isn't sharp that's reason enough to put Quick in. We have two world class goalies, use 'em.
 
AYqvcXj.gif

There's gotta be some logic to all this.
 
Kings carried most of the play in the first period. Canucks are lucky to be up right now.
 
Oh great, switch it on and we're in a 2-0 hole against these clowns. Bring back Dwighty, all is forgiven:cry:


edit,


post no. 74 coinkydink?
 
That's a crazy bounce off Doughty's stick on that 2nd goal. Still, another uninspiring period. They seem to work so hard for little return. Not that they seemed all that into it.

Plenty of time, but goddamn is that PP out of whack. The top guys have been playing together for years, and it seems like they don't even know each other's names.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom