JVR + Bozak + Polak/Hunwick(if you want)
For
Tanev + Tryamkin + Burrows (cap)
Canucks can roll a top line of JVR-Bozak-Eriksson, followed by Sedins
Leafs can stick Tanev with Rielly on the top pair, and Tryamkin with Zaistev on 2nd pairing. (Gardiner+Carrick on 3rd)
absolutely not, yuck.JVR + Bozak + Polak/Hunwick(if you want)
For
Tanev + Tryamkin + Burrows (cap)
Canucks can roll a top line of JVR-Bozak-Eriksson, followed by Sedins
Leafs can stick Tanev with Rielly on the top pair, and Tryamkin with Zaistev on 2nd pairing. (Gardiner+Carrick on 3rd)
JVR + Bozak + Polak/Hunwick(if you want)
For
Tanev + Tryamkin + Burrows (cap)
Canucks can roll a top line of JVR-Bozak-Eriksson, followed by Sedins
Leafs can stick Tanev with Rielly on the top pair, and Tryamkin with Zaistev on 2nd pairing. (Gardiner+Carrick on 3rd)
Ouch. I'm a leafer. .. but no. Van would get bent over bad in this scenario.
They want one of Marner or Nylander for Tanev. LOL.
Devils got Hall for Larsson. Nylander looks to be awesome I agree wouldn't trade him but Marner hasn't done anything yet. Hall is better then Marner and Tanev better then Larsson so only reasonable to assume Tanev better then Marner? I'm not saying do or not do as I'd keep Marner to but it's not lop sided in one way or another. There is a reason Leafs want Tanev he makes players around him better defensively.
Leafs should keep building slowly they have a nice group of young stars but don't think there all stars already there not. Tanev is a very valuable piece and would take a very big price to pry away.
Are you saying Tanev is better than Larsson?
Because he surely is not.