I disagree. As TG pointed out the Kings had some talented young players and were on the rise. I think going for the quick fix with the Gretzky trade and all the subsequent moves that were made diverted attention away from drafting and developing players properly. Years after Gretzky left that was reflected in management's attitude of hoping to throw the right mix of mercenaries together, then just make the playoffs, and anything can happen. That philosophy has been shown to be a complete fallacy.
I'm not blaming Gretzky for the trade itself, although I don't think he minded near as much as all the tears in his Edmonton press conference would suggest.
The Kings were still able to add talent that they had drafted to the roster while they traded for Gretzky and his Edmonton teammates though. Yes, they dealt for the likes of Coffey and Kurri and Huddy in separate deals, but did they really lose anything significant in those transactions? Hell, look at how much Carson regressed. Gelinas was nothing more than a 3rd line grinding winger who can chip in, and those draft picks didn't amount to anything aside for Martin Rucinsky.
The Kings still drafted well and brought in prospects like Rob Blake, Alexei Zhitnik, Darryl Sydor, and found some gems in Mike Donnelly, Corey Millen, and Warren Rychel, who all came in without any expectations and exceeded what any of us thought they could produce.
Kings management, likely compounded by McNall's financial problems, is what ruined this team starting with the summer of 1993 when they allowed McSorley to be offer sheeted by the Blues, matched the offer, and then dealt him for Shawn McEachern. The Kings tried to replace McSorley with Brent Thompson and brought in Doug Houda as well and it failed and forced the Kings to trade Tomas Sandstrom, along with Shawn McEachern (two top six forwards) in order to get McSorley back along with a throw in dman in Jim Paek who wasn't really necessary. Hell you could even go back to the Coffey trade to see how mismanaged the team was as they brought back Jimmy Carson and barely even used him. At least Shuchuk turned into a decent trivia question.
How can you fault Gretzky for those decisions? The proof is in front of you and shows that adding Gretzky took nothing away from drafting and developing players properly. They weren't ever that good at that in the first place. As I stated earlier, look at the Kings' farm team before Gretzky ever arrived, New Haven and Phoenix was a dump. The Kings just never paid attention to any of that stuff, and that was on management, not Gretzky. And it was like that before his arrival. Trading Larry Murphy, Garry Galley, the rights to Kevin Stevens, Grant Ledyard, trading Mark Hardy in his prime for Ron Duguay who was near retirement. This all took place before Gretzky arrived.
And hey, did I mention there terrific first round busts? Wayne McBean? Craig Duncanson and Dan Gratton? Craig Redmond anyone? Hell, look at all of the 2nd round draft picks the Kings wasted away on nothing throughout the 80s before Gretzky was acquired. Have you heard of Dave Morrison? Mike Heidt? Brian Wilks? Par Edlund? Paul Holden? They got lucky with Luc Robitaille, they didn't even know what they were getting when they picked him. Sure, they had Luc, Bernie, Carson and Duchesne, and that's it. They didn't have a slew of young players knocking on the door of an NHL roster.
Let's not act like the Kings were already on their way up before Gretzky's arrival because the reality is that they weren't.