Salary Cap: - 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXVI: End of season wrap up | Page 91 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Salary Cap: 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXVI: End of season wrap up

Status
Not open for further replies.
I maintain that Crosby can fix whatever is wrong with Marner. But it's not gonna fit the timeline and Dubas was gonna trade his ass anyway.
 
Almost kinda feel bad for the Leaf fans.
Almost.
In a continued effort to get passed "was Hornqvist a good player" discussion that we are for some reason on...

IF we are able acquire a young wing prospect like Howard AND we end up taking a wing like Eklund in the draft, how would everyone feel about using Koivunen to get a center prospect of equal value?

Like, I don't know if it's realistic or if Boston does it but Matthew Poitras would be a good example of a player for player swap. Obviously they are light on centers but...so are we.
100% I’d be down for a deal like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: plaidchuck
In a continued effort to get passed "was Hornqvist a good player" discussion that we are for some reason on...

IF we are able acquire a young wing prospect like Howard AND we end up taking a wing like Eklund in the draft, how would everyone feel about using Koivunen to get a center prospect of equal value?

Like, I don't know if it's realistic or if Boston does it but Matthew Poitras would be a good example of a player for player swap. Obviously they are light on centers but...so are we.
Or, you use Karlsson/Rust/Rakell to acquire assets to acquire centers and other pieces over the next couple of years, giving you wing depth that includes Koivunen, McGroarty, Howard, and Eklund, among others.

Not everything needs to be done this summer. You can parlay assets over the next couple of years to continue to build as necessary.
 
Better not touch Mitch Marner. Kid is a no show in the playoffs. The exact opposite of the type of player you win playoff games with (not that we will be seeing them for a long time)
Marner was over a point per game in the playoffs this year. Could he have been better? Sure. But I wouldn't call him a no-show.

Toronto got crushed in their own zone against Florida and that ultimately deflated the offense. They couldn't escape their zone.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominance
Or, you use Karlsson/Rust/Rakell to acquire assets to acquire centers and other pieces over the next couple of years, giving you wing depth that includes Koivunen, McGroarty, Howard, and Eklund, among others.

Not everything needs to be done this summer. You can parlay assets over the next couple of years to continue to build as necessary.
I don't disagree. That's certainly a viable and reasonable strategy. Mine was just more of "for discussion sake".

I was just pondering how do we deal from a position of strength for a position of weakness if we score some good solid wings in this off-season and in the draft.

Like just spitballin and freewheeling here:

EK to CAR for 1st+Walker
Rakell to LA for 1st
2nd+Pono to TBL for Howard
Koivunen for Poitras
2025 Draft: Eklund
2026 Draft: Roobroeck

Top 6 centers are Roobroeck and Poitras; Top 6 wings are McG, Eklund, Howard, and a FA/Draft/Existing guy
 
Last edited:
Nobody on the Leafs does anything for this team now or moving forward, and there's no way anybody from that team wants to go from a decade of losing to a team in the Pens' position; two years out from a Sid retirement and probably like half a decade of rebuild. Meanwhile, they're already seven years removed from a playoff round win themselves, and have missed three times in a row. :laugh: Yeah, match made in heaven.
 
I don't really follow this.
Marner and Tavares leave Toronto, amidst other changes there. Two pieces that weren't necessarily guaranteed to be available in free agency. Now they are. It creates a potential arms race. If Carolina, for example, grabs Marner, it may force other teams in the East to be more aggressive to respond.

It may make the market for Rakell or Karlsson richer. It may lead to a team grabbing Ehlers instead of relying on a young player to make their mark in their top six.

This isn't a great free agent class. There is the potential that some teams will try to avoid big contract mistakes with the rising cap and try to play it safe. So if a big piece or two is suddenly available, it may ratchet up the pressure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Friggin Dummy
Yeah, I kinda agree with DP. Though I don't think anything's really changed. It's been common knowledge that Marner was probably hitting FA regardless, but this cements it. Odds were decent Tavares would as well.

Still think it bodes well for the Pens to fleece some teams who miss out on big signings. But the hurdle remains; the team's gonna need to pick a lane and actually commit to moving EK, Rakell, and their beloved Rust.
 
In a continued effort to get passed "was Hornqvist a good player" discussion that we are for some reason on...

IF we are able acquire a young wing prospect like Howard AND we end up taking a wing like Eklund in the draft, how would everyone feel about using Koivunen to get a center prospect of equal value?

Like, I don't know if it's realistic or if Boston does it but Matthew Poitras would be a good example of a player for player swap. Obviously they are light on centers but...so are we.
I'd feel the same way I did when we sent out Yager for McGroarty. Concerned we let a good player out the door but intrigued by the prospect of an even better one coming back. It just has to work out.
 
How about instead of doing the dumbest possible shit imaginable that'll continue to set this team back years from relevance, for the sake of getting a 4-1 or 4-0 playoff showing, the team just trades EK and Rakell this summer and gets a haul for Rust at the TDL next season, and commits to actually building a team worth a damn for the foreseeable future. :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad