eXile3
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2020
- 4,277
- 5,821
You think 21 is old?
The trading a 1st for him is so outlandish, and even moreso to trade someone to garnish a 1st and use to get him.I’d offer our highest 2nd next year for Howard. I don’t think he’s some can’t-miss prospect or a lot more valuable than the late 1st they took him with in the first place.
Maybe throw in Washington’s 2nd this year?
I don't think anybody is suggesting giving up a high to mid 1st for him. We're proposing to trade Rakell or Rust for a 1st+ (prospect/young player), probably from a contending team.
Any Penguins 1st should be off limits. The Rangers' 1st rounder, whether it's 11th overall this draft or an unprotected 1st next year, should be off limits too imo. But if this team could get Howard for two 2nds, or a later 1st by way of trading EK, Rust or Rakell, then yeah. Dubas should absolutely be trying to get the dude.
He may not pan out, he may bust, but this is the kinda moves the team should be looking to make alongside the tanking effort.
Another thing to consider regarding Howard: if you trade for him, I think the chances that the Penguins sell Rakell would go up. You only have so many top-9 winger spots and Howard would likely only sign if you're guaranteeing him a NHL spot immediately. Selling Rakell for a 1st and trading that 1st for Howard would be an A+ move by Dubas IMO.
Running with Koivunen, McGroarty and Howard all in their top-6 (or top-9 at worst) would be a really nice youth movement for next year. You can get really wild and try to get something like:
Howard-Crosby-Marner
Koivunen-Malkin-Rust
McGroarty-Novak-Tomasino
I don’t mind the plan of trading Rakell for 1st+ and then using that 1st to acquire Howard.Oh no, people want a rebuilding team to trade a guy coming off a career season and use his return to acquire a prospect that was a 1st rounder and just won the Hobey Baker. What insanity!
But you are putting what you want over what the team is actually doing. You call it rebuild, they call it retool because it is what they are doing.
You are speaking in fantasy talk here. Which is fine if that's all anyone really thinks you mean. You want it to happen, so if you say it enough it must be true.
Hobey Baker or not, a 1st is dumb, and the kids' attitude doesn't speak so well that does he want to come here even? Without knowing I'm not even offering a 2nd let alone trading a valuable asset so you can facilitate a lesser asset.
I literally can't take you serious about any of these fantasy takes. That's all they are. Which again, is okay if it is all you are offering it up as. You believe in this BS you are trying to sell.
They will not be getting this year's 1st. Might as well get that fantasy off your mind. They don't have to let the Pens know until June 25th. They'd be stupid letting it go. Especially if it's a lottery pick which we'll find out Monday. Next year's pick will most certainly be worse, much worse.
You are literally what I consider one of those people who would be okay with a revolving door of prospects.
Exabit A:
How's this any different with Rakell in it when you're adding Marner?
Also, Tampa's lineup is logjammed, the Pens not so much. Not where Rakell needs removed. There needs to be room for him to fight for a spot, not hand him a spot right out of the gate.
The Pens have 2 top six wing regulars and 4 more wing spots in the top 9 for the prospects to fight for.
Straight to Crosby's line... This all-screams fantasy talk.
To be fair it was over after the Montreal series and many of the people said we were being alarmist for calling that out.It's very funny to watch people who are simply unable or unwilling to accept that the era's dead, and has been for years at this point.It's over, dude. Move on.
2019 - Well that's weird. The coach didn't even try to adjust to handle the Isles' forecheck. Hmm.To be fair it was over after the Montreal series and many of the people said we were being alarmist for calling that out.![]()
Believe this is called schizophrenia.It's very funny to watch people who are simply unable or unwilling to accept that the era's dead, and has been for years at this point.It's over, dude. Move on.
Are any of our players in the WCs?
The sooner you accept that the Penguins are rebuilding, the sooner you'll realize that the novels you are posting are completely nonsensical.
You seem to be the only one on here who refuses to acknowledge what this team is, and you're just ranting that everyone else has come to reality with the state of this franchise.
It's very funny to watch people who are simply unable or unwilling to accept that the era's dead, and has been for years at this point.It's over, dude. Move on.
Howard is every bit as good a prospect, or better, than McG, based on scouting reports and stuff from guys like Pronman and Wheeler. Different styles, and not core pieces, but important supporting cast guys if everything works out and they hit their potential.
He's also not really like anybody the Pens have either, imo. He scores off the rush a ton, he's got a heck of a shot, great hands. Way more singularly offensive-minded. I guess maybe Koivunen is similar? But I dunno.
To be fair it was over after the Montreal series and many of the people said we were being alarmist for calling that out.![]()
It's all the same small crowd 4/5 patting each other's backs.Believe this is called schizophrenia.
I love Howard's upside. Very much boom/bust, but his ceiling is high. I'd give up quite a bit for him, but I feel like he has 1 or 2 specific places he wants to go and we are neither of them.