Gurglesons
Registered User
It still sickens me Philly got Michkov that year. Hes going to end up the best player in that draft. We should have just embraced the suck earlier.
Don't sleep on Fantilli.
It still sickens me Philly got Michkov that year. Hes going to end up the best player in that draft. We should have just embraced the suck earlier.
The u18 last year really did it for me. I thought McKenna was truly incredible in a way Bedard wasn’t at the same tourney.I think Cristall putting up similar numbers to McKenna and McKenna's no show at the WJC makes me question how much better he is than Bedard.
I don't see an issue with it. Marner wouldn't even necessarily stop the tank. Gaudreau didn't for Columbus.No it isn’t, sucking to get better prospects is and we’ve done a good job with that plan the last two times we have.
Signing Marner 1.5 years after letting Guentzel and just about every other player of significance go is not a plan to me. That makes no sense.
People keep saying this, but with McKenna, yes it is.Praying for a lottery win isn't a plan.
I'm concerned with Bedard just not having the physical tools to dominate at the NHL level. He's small but he doesn't seem to have amazing skating. His playmaking is good but it's not earthshattering. His shot is his best asset but NHL teams don't let him take it 5v5 and he doesn't have the skating to consistently create his own shot.You don't need NHL talent to get off your shot. Bedard looked great to end the season.
I thought he was going to be a 90-100 pt player immediately. The fact he hasn't had any translatable success and the fact the CHL has generally not been producing top flight NHL talent makes me question how good McKenna actually is.
God, I can't f***ing wait for Marner to sign somewhere else.
Why wouldn't this team go scorched earth for McKenna and Dupont the year after? BTW, scorched earth in this scenario means dealing EK, Rakell and Rust. Not gutting franchise icons or anything. You remove those three guys and this team, even with THE Sidney Crosby, is absolutely bad enough to finish dead last. They were bottom 4 for stretches this season, and that's with Sid playing as well as anybody his age ever has.
People keep saying this, but with McKenna, yes it is.You have the potential to get a 100pt winger for the next 20 years if things work out, and the year after, Dupont has the potential to be a #1 d-man for his entire career as well. Even if you miss, you're still drafting top 2 or 3 realistically.
Chasing those guys at the expense of meaningless players like Rakell, Rust and EK--and meaningless seasons as a team like the Pens with where they're at now and moving forward--is 1000% worth doing.
People are always talking about and looking for ways to make the post-Sid years as painless as possible. Those two guys are how you do that, not chasing a 28 year old Marner.![]()
I'm concerned with Bedard just not having the physical tools to dominate at the NHL level. He's small but he doesn't seem to have amazing skating. His playmaking is good but it's not earthshattering. His shot is his best asset but NHL teams don't let him take it 5v5 and he doesn't have the skating to consistently create his own shot.
I still think he's going to develop into a PPG player because his shot is that good and even if he's doing most of his work on the powerplay that's eventually going to be enough to make him that kind of offensive producer.
Funniest thing ever would be Dubas actually strips it down to the studs and Jarry has a Vezina year.
I don't doubt the capabilities of McKenna, it's just in order to have a good chance at him you have to finish dead last and Dubas isn't going to gut the roster enough to make that happen.People keep saying this, but with McKenna, yes it is.![]()
I personally don’t think we should be modeling anything after Columbus.I don't see an issue with it. Marner wouldn't even necessarily stop the tank. Gaudreau didn't for Columbus.
The goal right now is to accumulate top end talent however Dubas can do that. The most obvious route is the draft so that's what he's doing. But if a Marner falls into his lap he'd be a fool not to consider it.
I don't see it happening anyways though.
You might be right. I'm just talking about what I've seen of Bedard in the NHL moreso than anything he did in junior.I just think the reality is the CHL is an incredibly weak league right now.
Re the whole who much to value a winger thing - I'd say Tampa are probably as good an example of the things you can do with an elite playdriving winger as Chicago. Together they account for a lot of recent-ish cups, and you could argue that the most important offensive play on the Caps and Blues was a winger too.
It's hard for a winger to make that sort of impact because, anything else apart, if they're that good with the puck on their stick they're probably getting moved to C if their defensive game will support it. But they can definitely have an impact.
And tbh, if you're not getting Sid, it looks like arguably the best model is responsible AF two way centre with a wizard on the wing. Probably because Sid aside, no C is that much of a wizard and that responsible.
Moot since there's no way to plan around getting McKenna.
Given Jarry's uncanny knack for performing best when it doesn't matter and regressing when it does, this seems weirdly plausible to me.
Tort-less Michkov is going to explode next year. The only thing that can prevent that is possibly a Rick Tocchet hire, but I think Tocchet is a good enough coach to not get in his way. His system, though, may hinder his numbers a bit.Don't sleep on Fantilli.
But it's not how modern championship teams or most contenders are built.We need to bottom out. That’s how we have built championship teams.
Tort-less Michkov is going to explode next year. The only thing that can prevent that is possibly a Rick Tocchet hire, but I think Tocchet is a good enough coach to not get in his way. His system, though, may hinder his numbers a bit.
I doubt you'll see freakouts about it. Most people in here don't want Marner and the ones that are more open to the idea aren't the meltdown types.I personally don’t think we should be modeling anything after Columbus.
I don’t think it’s happening either, but when it doesn’t I fully expect a few meltdowns of why couldn’t we land Marner.
Do they not acquire high end talent? Most often from early 1st rounds in drafts?
But that is also pretty much every team that wins the Cup too. We certainly didn't win those Cup without savvy trades and taking advantage of Kessel's situation, etc. Nobody can build a championship team in house. But who didn't acquire cheap high 1st round picks is more my question?Florida, Tampa and Colorado did have high 1st round picks, but their teams were largely built through trade and taking advantage of situations like Marner.
But that is also pretty much every team that wins the Cup too. We certainly didn't win those Cup without savvy trades and taking advantage of Kessel's situation, etc. Nobody can build a championship team in house. But who didn't acquire cheap high 1st round picks is more my question?
I doubt you'll see freakouts about it. Most people in here don't want Marner and the ones that are more open to the idea aren't the meltdown types.
But yeah agreed it probably doesn't happen. I don't know why Mitch would even consider it outside of the connection to Dubas and his friendship with Crosby. But I don't think those two factors are gonna steer him away from re-signing in Toronto or signing with some team that has a better chance to compete.
Yeah, but talk about an exceptional case. We'll never have an expansion draft to benefit from.Vegas.