Invalid cuz QoC
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2017
- 1,167
- 1,021
Just pray they get swept by LA and the universe will make it happen. You know he wants to play at least one season with Sid.I mean.......McDavid would win here.
Just pray they get swept by LA and the universe will make it happen. You know he wants to play at least one season with Sid.I mean.......McDavid would win here.
The trend sort of seems to be that the goalies almost dictate the goaltending coach, at least at the NHL level. At least, that seemed to be home things have gone in Pittsburgh. Mike Bales was let go because he had ties to Marc-Andre Fleury and Flower was headed to Vegas, while Mike Buckley was close with Matt Murray. When Murray struggled and Jarry took over - and then struggled - Buckley was canned. That led to Chiodo, who had been working as the goaltending development coach.That's kind of my read on the situation.
It's just funny to me because the Penguins have a few decent goaltending prospects (the strength of their overall pool rn maybe?) and some NHL guys who clearly need some work. Soooooooooooo... one would think an experienced goaltending coach with a track record of success would be something they'd want to look into. Maybe they are in short supply though IDK. I mean good goaltenders are so perhaps that translates to the coaching side of things, too lol
Literally everyone struggles under Sullivan. The issue is Dubas is too dumb a f*** to see it like every f***ing wanker that has the power to fire that piece of shit.I remember Dubas also made a comment about Pickering struggling when I didn’t think he was. Kind of weird. But I agree he shouldn’t just be handed a spot, he’s still pretty green.
A lot of teams don’t “bring the goalie coach that the goalie prefers” - they hire a goalie coach that understands the position has to adapt and evolve and coaches them to work within those parameters. The goalie coaching the goalie prefers hasn’t worked consistently - they’ve been through Bales, Buckley, and Chiodo now.The trend sort of seems to be that the goalies almost dictate the goaltending coach, at least at the NHL level. At least, that seemed to be home things have gone in Pittsburgh. Mike Bales was let go because he had ties to Marc-Andre Fleury and Flower was headed to Vegas, while Mike Buckley was close with Matt Murray. When Murray struggled and Jarry took over - and then struggled - Buckley was canned. That led to Chiodo, who had been working as the goaltending development coach.
So, who knows. I think a new voice is definitely worth it.
I'd also like to see Ty Hennes reassigned an actual tactician added to the coaching staff if they're not going to fire Sullivan. Hennes is a strength and conditioning guy. That's fine. You need them. He doesn't need to be a full-fledged assistant. Get someone with some ideas.
I’m glad he got paid. Imagine starting your career with 2 Cup wins and never getting the payoff contract.Speaking of goalies -
Anyone have a beat on Murray? Obviously has a special place for being our cup goalie [nod to obvious things here that get ignored until they become revelations: goalie who is just calm versus doing too much / net front player + grit (Hornqvist) / steady defense (Cole/Daley)...coach needing to be fired....ermmm]
...but yeah - his play obviously fell off but is he still trying to make a push or riding to the sunset?
I’m glad he got paid. Imagine starting your career with 2 Cup wins and never getting the payoff contract.
Probably loads of situations like this. Where you truly have an impact but then fall off for whatever reason(s) and miss out on the big payday.
But yeah I was happy to see some bigger money get thrown his way. Always hoped he would rebound but honestly never heard anything more about him after he got signed in Toronto a few years ago. Seemed like a good kid who wasn't falling off for anything other than injuries etc. Nothing in the way of partying too much or not putting in the work. Someone you'd root for at least at the surface without knowing much else.
I swear there were multiple reports before the deadline, both local and national, that we were open to moving him but it was more likely to be an off-season deal because of the contractPerformance doesn't matter in this discussion.
The crucial issue is that you stated there appears to be no interest in trading Karlsson, yet there are examples where Dubas has outright said a player has a big role to play in the future of the Penguins and then traded that player a month later.
I don't think anyone can say with any certainty what will happen, but I don't think anyone should have the impression that Karlsson's a lock to stay with the Penguins.
I don’t think it will make the defence worse. Mostly because I think this defence is, practically, rock bottom. Sure, it’ll technically get worse, less-skilled if you move EK, but it’s not like EK was some stabilizing force back there.Team Sweden is stacked with defensively responsible teammates. The Penguins are one of the weakest defensive lineups in the league. Even if you're disappointed with Karlsson, I do not know how anyone could think trading him will not make the defense worse next year. Letang was way worse than Karlsson was this year. At his age he'll probably be even worse next year. I have no problem trading him at all for futures. But I hope fans are prepared to have an even worse defense.
From an actual defending perspective I agree. However, Karlsson is still elite offensively and removing him will immediately make the overall offensive threat from the blue line non-existent. Letang is a way worse player overall. Bad defensively and anemic offensively. Gryz was arguably a better dman than Letang this year and he is like a cheap version of Karlsson. I hope they trade Karlsson, but when the offense predictably declines, his absence will be a key reason why.I don’t think it will make the defence worse. Mostly because I think this defence is, practically, rock bottom. Sure, it’ll technically get worse, less-skilled if you move EK, but it’s not like EK was some stabilizing force back there.
We’ve reached terminal velocity with our D and Gs
How about Karlsson for Nikishin? Retain on Karlsson and add a sweetener if necessary.If Carolina finishes ticking off Nikishin enough that he requests a trade, whats everyone think about a deal around 9OA for him?
I would retain EK down to 5MM to get Nikishin. I'd be open to a bit of a sweetener, but don't see the value as crazy far off with full retention.How about Karlsson for Nikishin? Retain on Karlsson and add a sweetener if necessary.
At this stage, the Penguins would be better served acquiring assets for Karlsson and eventually replacing the offense expected from him - and later, Letang - in the aggregate. You may not Norris caliber defensemen anymore, but you can have guys who can effectively run the point on the power play, move the puck well, be a threat to score occasionally, AND be responsible in their own end.From an actual defending perspective I agree. However, Karlsson is still elite offensively and removing him will immediately make the overall offensive threat from the blue line non-existent. Letang is a way worse player overall. Bad defensively and anemic offensively. Gryz was arguably a better dman than Letang this year and he is like a cheap version of Karlsson. I hope they trade Karlsson, but when the offense predictably declines, his absence will be a key reason why.
At this stage, the Penguins would be better served acquiring assets for Karlsson and eventually replacing the offense expected from him - and later, Letang - in the aggregate. You may not Norris caliber defensemen anymore, but you can have guys who can effectively run the point on the power play, move the puck well, be a threat to score occasionally, AND be responsible in their own end.
I think spreading the wealth along the blueline will be a better way for the Pens moving forward unless they hit on a real dynamic defensive prospect at some point.
KD: You cant play Nieto at LW tonight...hes been sent to WBS.Agree- they need to take a Moneyball approach with this and have "specialists" on defense.
If Carolina finishes ticking off Nikishin enough that he requests a trade, whats everyone think about a deal around 9OA for him?
At this stage, the Penguins would be better served acquiring assets for Karlsson and eventually replacing the offense expected from him - and later, Letang - in the aggregate. You may not Norris caliber defensemen anymore, but you can have guys who can effectively run the point on the power play, move the puck well, be a threat to score occasionally, AND be responsible in their own end.
I think spreading the wealth along the blueline will be a better way for the Pens moving forward unless they hit on a real dynamic defensive prospect at some point.
I think it's a process. And development of prospects is really key. It also depends on how aggressive Dubas wants to be in terms of giving up assets. If he adds someone like Byram, does he also try for someone a little less expensive in Hague? Does he try to do a one-year reclamation deal with a younger UFA like Henri Jokiharju?The issue is there is no D available.
I think it's a process. And development of prospects is really key. It also depends on how aggressive Dubas wants to be in terms of giving up assets. If he adds someone like Byram, does he also try for someone a little less expensive in Hague? Does he try to do a one-year reclamation deal with a younger UFA like Henri Jokiharju?
Or does he only do one major deal and then give an opportunity to guys like Kolyochonok and St. Ivany, along with Pickering, with the idea of adding more down the road?