Salary Cap: - 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXIIX: Rust out, Marner in, all part of the plan! | Page 52 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Salary Cap: 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXIIX: Rust out, Marner in, all part of the plan!

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can be skeptical, I was very upset he turned it down. It was a mistake.
I'm not sure you have anyway to verify that offer was made but I'll live in that world.

How could you turn that down as an NHL GM. I'd be so livid if I was on staff and heard that was turned down.

What possible justification could you make.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure you have anyway to verify that offer was made but I'll live in that world.

How could you turn that down as an NHL GM. I'd be so livid if I was on staff and heard that was turned down.
I wanted to throw a chair. I feel your pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lustaf
I know things you don't that's for damn sure. You're completely clueless on the vast majority of your assertions.
Bro tryna tell us he has contacts guys like Friedman and Lebrun don't and that Dubas turned down Clarke, Moore, and a 1st lmfaooooo

1750457413823.png
 
You can think what you want, but he was.
Source? I'm not being confrontational, I'm just asking.

It's like the Guentzel trade when people said stuff like "he was offered a 1st and a blue chip prospect and said no" but never backed it up with a Source.
 
As I said, you are clueless.
> every single insider says Dubas wants a roster player, top prospect and pick if he's trading Rakell

>HFBoards makes up fictional pipe dream proposal to hope for

> Ryder says months later that the specific HFBoard pipe dream proposal that had everything Dubas dreamed of was turned down


K man whatever you say
 
Source? I'm not being confrontational, I'm just asking.

It's like the Guentzel trade when people said stuff like "he was offered a 1st and a blue chip prospect and said no" but never backed it up with a Source.
The Guentzel trade was far more murky to figure out, which is why I never said anything. There was a lot of speculation that one of the pieces was Blake if you remember. Of course it didn't turn out that way. Honestly, that was one I never speculated about because I didn't know.
 
The disappointing thing with this off-season is that I'm honestly not seeing a way that Dubas can realistically add to the LD group in terms of actual long-term solutions in a way I like. It's either pay out the ass for Byram, which I don't think the Penguins should be doing, or it's drafting a super flawed LD prospect in Smith or Aitcheson. I might be missing some guys that could become available, but I'm really not sure who I'm missing.
 
> every single insider says Dubas wants a roster player, top prospect and pick if he's trading Rakell

>HFBoards makes up fictional pipe dream proposal to hope for

> Ryder says months later that the specific HFBoard pipe dream proposal that had everything Dubas dreamed of was turned down


K man whatever you say
If you're using ''insiders'' you're essentially outsourcing your info. In which case anyone on the internet could quote it. On the Rakell situation that was not the case.

But you get it wrong a lot, so whatever.
 
If you're using ''insiders'' you're essentially outsourcing your info. In which case anyone on the internet could quote it. On the Rakell situation that was not the case.

But you get it wrong a lot, so whatever.
This is incoherent.

So why did Dubas turn down the HFBoards-made proposal?
 
Claims to have worked for the Pens in the past. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
He also claims to have insider knowledge on the draft after saying that 4 out of the 5 consensus ranked picks where the Pens draft would be unacceptable to draft. So.. I think he's delusional until he proves otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T1K
This is incoherent.

So why did Dubas turn down the HFBoards-made proposal?
It's not incoherent. ''Insiders'' are essentially middlemen who are used (sometimes strategically) to throw out helpful info for a given team to either gin up interest or to give info on a trade that's all but officially consummated. They'll get info directly from Agents, GM's or AGM's or higher ups in the FO's etc.

I don't need a middle man. Not in most cases. But I don't know every single detail to every single transaction. Just the big ones, or potential big deals. Sometimes I know, other times I don't. For example: I'm not overly concerned about who we hire as our assistant coaches. I wouldn't even try to look into that.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad