Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread XVII

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know it's not a trade but as far as coaching goes...

If you could get Tocchet this summer locked in for 3-4 years, would you?

What is so great about Tocchet? Majority of his seasons as head coach he's missed the playoffs.

Same with people wanting Mike Sullivan. Sure he had success, but that was 7 years ago. Whatever he's preaching over in Pittsburgh hasn't been working. Not sure why people think it would work in Boston all of a sudden. Going into the 4 Nations championship game, Kyle Connor was the top US born player in the entire NHL in both goals and points and he had the audacity to scratch him for a Chris Kreider, a player with 4 assists this season. If that's his views on the modern NHL he's behind the times clearly.
 
If you can get a 1st round pick for Carlo, I would trade him.
there are studies on the draft such as according to Brian Burke when he was between gigs working on NHL that were fascinating

The % of success by rounds 2-7 using 246 games (three 82 game seasons); the quality of the players who made it from there

The second round was around 22% or 1 in 5 to play 246 games and 40% you get an very good player (Ryan Spooner hit 246 as did Carlo, Krejci, Begeron, Lucic which is why they probably won a Cup and why over 15 had the most points and went to 3 Finals and set records in other seasons.

So about 2.5 guys from the second round end up regulars who could be Sebastian Aho or Brandon Carlo

Also, obviously all first round picks aren’t created equally.

Statistically after 10 the decrease is significant getting a star

They trade Carlo it’s gotta be 8-12 area

He’s playing now and the pick if successful is likely 3-5 years away from contributing

I have no interest in a late first round pick for Carlo or Coyle under term and Carlo only 28

Dumb
 
Would I do it?

Yes, I would,

The “leadership” part to me seems at least somewhat questionable. We all want to believe he’s a good leader, but it’s not like we have the kind of proof we did with Bergeron and Chara.

And this team has no identity whatsoever. They’re inconsistent, can’t improve in any areas, often fail to show up, etc. Not sure I’d be claiming his leadership would be a massive loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pucksindeep92
The “leadership” part to me seems at least somewhat questionable. We all want to believe he’s a good leader, but it’s not like we have the kind of proof we did with Bergeron and Chara.

And this team has no identity whatsoever. They’re inconsistent, can’t improve in any areas, often fail to show up, etc. Not sure I’d be claiming his leadership would be a massive loss.

It absolutely has an identity. A team that can't produce offense. You subtract Pastrnak and this is the most offensively challenged team in the NHL.
 



ST. PAUL, Minn. — David Pastrnak was buzzing.

As he has been since the calendar switched to 2025, the Bruins winger — and the hottest scorer across the NHL — was the most noticeable player on the ice Sunday. He provided the Bruins and the Wild crowd with energy and entertainment with every shift at the Xcel Energy Center.

He led the Bruins in ice time (25:18), shots on goal (5), and gave his teammates oodles of opportunities.
However, for the first time in 18 games, Pastrnak was held off the scoresheet. As was every Black and Gold skater in a 1-0 loss.

Pastrnak’s 17-game scoring streak set an NHL record for a Czechia-born player, eclipsing 16-gamers by Jaromir Jagr (2000-01) and Robert Lang (2003-04).

With Pastrnak (32 goals, 75 points) blanked and Brad Marchand (21 goals, 47 points) on the shelf, the Bruins were unable to sneak any pucks past Filip Gustavsson, who put on a Gold Glove performance with 28 saves.

The shutout underscored what has been a problem area for the Bruins all season: secondary scoring.

When teams are able to blanket Pastrnak, Boston has been unable to consistently generate offense and find production from others. The loss to the Wild was the sixth time the Bruins have been shut out this season, tied for third most in the NHL.

When teams have a prolific scorer such as Pastrnak, sometimes others can get caught watching and waiting for him to do his thing. The Bruins need their depth players to be more proactive.

Charlie Coyle pointed to playing with confidence as a key.

“I think it’s a mind-set thing and everyone’s got to have that belief that you can put the puck in the net, but we can’t get away from our little details and what gives us the puck and possession more and opportunities. That’s something that we have to make sure we kind of hone in on still,” said Coyle. “Especially when you don’t score in a game, it’s almost natural to get away and try to find another avenue around it. And yeah, there’s little things inside that we can figure out and maybe be better at, but we’ve got to keep our details going the right way. Dial those in. We’re going to get opportunities and we’re going to finish. But yeah, we need that secondary scoring, and we need guys to take responsibility, including myself, and contribute that way.”

Joe Sacco, whose team has played in seven straight one-goal games, said gaining inside ice on a consistent basis is a way of creating Grade-A chances.

“Whether it’s creating more traffic at the net, having more of a shot mind-set, playing off the shot more, creating some more two-on-ones. Just getting to the inside,” said the coach. “I thought against the Islanders, even though we didn’t grab a point, we had better looks. I thought Minnesota did a good job trying to keep us to the outside. We have to find a way to get into the interior more.”

Getting to that hard ice in and around the slot will be critical down the stretch as the Bruins play playoff-like hockey to stay in the hunt for an invite to the postseason.
 
The “leadership” part to me seems at least somewhat questionable. We all want to believe he’s a good leader, but it’s not like we have the kind of proof we did with Bergeron and Chara.

And this team has no identity whatsoever. They’re inconsistent, can’t improve in any areas, often fail to show up, etc. Not sure I’d be claiming his leadership would be a massive loss.

IMHO Brad has done the best he can with the roster he's been given.

And that roster is, evidently, shit.

You can't blame that on Brad Marchand. And you can't blame #63 for a lack of veteran leadership outside of Coyle and Carlo.

Z & Patrice had much more to work with, including a younger Marchand.

The flaming fiasco that is the 2024-2025 Boston Bruins cannot be laid at Brad Marchand's feet.

The bag of pooh, alit, was hand delivered by Professor Sweeney.
 
The “leadership” part to me seems at least somewhat questionable. We all want to believe he’s a good leader, but it’s not like we have the kind of proof we did with Bergeron and Chara.

And this team has no identity whatsoever. They’re inconsistent, can’t improve in any areas, often fail to show up, etc. Not sure I’d be claiming his leadership would be a massive loss.
I'd blame Sweeney's vision and execution more than Marchand's leadership personally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gerrycheeversmask
Please continue here:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad