Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread X

[Gee Wally]

Please continue.

Click to read more...

 

[KillerMillerTime]

Nothing like the whiff of a brand new Roster\Cap Thread about to be polluted, but I'm here to do my part, I promise.

 

[goldenblack]

Carrying on from the other thread, I don't see a single viable trade for Zibanejad

But why do people hate him at 8.5m? Last 3 seasons of 81, 91, 72 pts. He's massively outperforming 8.5m. I'm not going to worry about these 30 games.

That said, I don't see a trade that fits both clubs.

 

[BigGoalBrad]

Carrying on from the other thread, I don't see a single viable trade for Zibanejad

But why do people hate him at 8.5m? Last 3 seasons of 81, 91, 72 pts. He's massively outperforming 8.5m. I'm not going to worry about these 30 games.

That said, I don't see a trade that fits both clubs.

Zacha and or Coyle for him makes sense. We get another player in the deal somewhere and maybe add a prospect.

 

[goldenblack]

Zacha and or Coyle for him makes sense. We get another player in the deal somewhere and maybe add a prospect.

I prefer Zacha (also only 27) at 4.75 than him at 8.5, in a cap world. So I'm not trading away the Zacha contract.

We would have to add a fair bit to Coyle. And I don't see why the Rangers would want Coyle playing as bad as he has in some years. I think these 2 squads don't make great trade partners.

 

[Absurdity]

Carrying on from the other thread, I don't see a single viable trade for Zibanejad

But why do people hate him at 8.5m? Last 3 seasons of 81, 91, 72 pts. He's massively outperforming 8.5m. I'm not going to worry about these 30 games.

That said, I don't see a trade that fits both clubs.

If the Rangers plan on dumping him like they did Trouba, maybe the Bruins can get him for Coyle + Frederic with maybe the Rangers retaining $1M to make the cap work. Then the Bruins bring up Poitras to center the 3rd line.

 

[BruinDust]

Was signing declining Elias Lindholm to a long-term deal taking him past his mid-30s a massive mistake? You betcha.

Trading for declining Zibanejad would be like doubling down on that same mistake.

28 million over the next 5 years spent on Elias, Hampus, Zibanejad and Zadorov is flat out nuts even with a rising cap.

 

[TCB]

If the Rangers plan on dumping him like they did Trouba, maybe the Bruins can get him for Coyle + Frederic with maybe the Rangers retaining $1M to make the cap work. Then the Bruins bring up Poitras to center the 3rd line.

If the Rags are willing to to trade Mikka for that,imo there’s no way the Bruins get him. This guy is a stud far better than any current Bruins Center. Other teams will beat that offer in a nano second.

 

[Jorgolyte]

What? Zibanejad? Come on, that would be a terrible play on all levels. Wouldn't even trade Lindholm for him much less Zacha. Plus the hair...

 

[Jorah Marshmont]

No to Zibanejad. They should be getting younger, not older.
I’d rather gamble on cheap young players improving instead of expensive old players not declining.

 

[Hookslide]

Was signing declining Elias Lindholm to a long-term deal taking him past his mid-30s a massive mistake? You betcha.

Trading for declining Zibanejad would be like doubling down on that same mistake.

28 million over the next 5 years spent on Elias, Hampus, Zibanejad and Zadorov is flat out nuts even with a rising cap.

I agree with pretty much everything you are saying , but I must disagree with Hampus being included, I think he had a stretch where he was struggling, and I think that might have been injury related, but overall, I think is one solid defenseman.

 

[Jorgolyte]

Was signing declining Elias Lindholm to a long-term deal taking him past his mid-30s a massive mistake? You betcha.

Trading for declining Zibanejad would be like doubling down on that same mistake.

28 million over the next 5 years spent on Elias, Hampus, Zibanejad and Zadorov is flat out nuts even with a rising cap.

Totally

 

[BruinDust]

I agree with pretty much everything you are saying , but I must disagree with Hampus being included, I think he had a stretch where he was struggling, and I think that might have been injury related, but overall, I think is one solid defenseman.

I like Hampus, felt he was playing the best of all the D-men before he went down. He's still solid, but I wouldn't put money on that contract aging well. He seemed a bit slower last year (guessing he was playing injured) and it really limited his effectiveness.

 

[BigGoalBrad]

I prefer Zacha (also only 27) at 4.75 than him at 8.5, in a cap world. So I'm not trading away the Zacha contract.

We would have to add a fair bit to Coyle. And I don't see why the Rangers would want Coyle playing as bad as he has in some years. I think these 2 squads don't make great trade partners.

I think Fox for McAvoy would wake up both teams and players.

 

[4ORRBRUIN]

I think Fox for McAvoy would wake up both teams and players.

No thanks, McAvoy's game is a Boston game. Fox is flash and dash, NY type of player.

 

[Absurdity]

Was signing declining Elias Lindholm to a long-term deal taking him past his mid-30s a massive mistake? You betcha.

Trading for declining Zibanejad would be like doubling down on that same mistake.

28 million over the next 5 years spent on Elias, Hampus, Zibanejad and Zadorov is flat out nuts even with a rising cap.

To his defense, Zibanejad is a better offensive center than Lindholm. He has been or close to a PPG player since 2018. His contract is also buyout friendly.

If the Rags are willing to to trade Mikka for that,imo there’s no way the Bruins get him. This guy is a stud far better than any current Bruins Center. Other teams will beat that offer in a nano second.

They got rid of Trouba, who had a NMC, for Vaakanainen and a 2nd. Zibanejad also has a NMC so he controls where he goes. If the Rangers also plan on dumping him, they don't have much of a say similarly how we got Taylor Hall for Bjork and a 2nd.

 

[MarchysNoseKnows]

To his defense, Zibanejad is a better offensive center than Lindholm. He has been or close to a PPG player since 2018. His contract is also buyout friendly.

They got rid of Trouba, who had a NMC, for Vaakanainen and a 2nd. Zibanejad also has a NMC so he controls where he goes. If the Rangers also plan on dumping him, they don't have much of a say similarly how we got Taylor Hall for Bjork and a 2nd.

Trouba’s NMC expired July 1. He had a 15 team NTC.

 

[TCB]

Was signing declining Elias Lindholm to a long-term deal taking him past his mid-30s a massive mistake? You betcha.

Trading for declining Zibanejad would be like doubling down on that same mistake.

28 million over the next 5 years spent on Elias, Hampus, Zibanejad and Zadorov is flat out nuts even with a rising cap.

That would be a fire-able offense no question, but if The Rangers are willing to Move Mika for Elias Lindholm, imo the bruins have to do it, but I doubt the Rags do. I haven't watched Zibanajed this year and the Rangers board has him all but in the old-timers home but I cant believe this guy has fallen that far that fast.

 

[BruinDust]

That would be a fire-able offense no question, but if The Rangers are willing to Move Mika for Elias Lindholm, imo the bruins have to do it, but I doubt the Rags do. I haven't watched Zibanajed this year and the Rangers board has him all but in the old-timers home but I cant believe this guy has fallen that far that fast.

Lindholm has a full no move clause. If they asked him to waive it here 2 months into a 7 year contract, you'll never see another significant UFA sign here again under Sweeney and Neely's administration.

 

[GordonHowe]

Trade Interest For Bruins Forward Reportedly Intensifying

According to Elliotte Friedman, the trade interest around Boston Bruins forward Trent Frederic is picking up.

causewaycrowd.com

Bruins Captain Brad Marchand Hyping Up New Teammate

Looking to make lineup changes, Boston Bruins GM Don Sweeney had a decision to make Friday and Saturday when the New York Islanders placed Oliver Wahlstrom on w

causewaycrowd.com