Normally, Wally I would have posted before you, but this is one time, I might revaluate that "NO". he still has been productive last few years 39-36- 52 goals, twos years after this not a terrible contract, one of favorites Stamkos 4 years at 8 mil already, 34 and will be 35 come February, stop and think a little, is it that bad ? Now my question is cost to obtain.
What 23 year old are you talking about ?
Wally, just to let you know, I did not mean to imply that you were not thinking, should have worded it differently.
Who? We talking about?
what makes you think they would sell him on the low ?
Meh. Give me Trouba because I like violence and Zegras because he hasn’t hit his prime.
You watch Zegras , long enough, the violence might be you hurting yourself.
There is always teams like Anaheim they been drafting in the top 10 for so long that they have a better player in the minors. So they then try to move the player out of his natural position, and when that does work a trade is next.
Seen above reply to @Kegs
But he would improve it because he would probably replace one of those guys, and if he put on the Bruins jersey tomorrow, he'd be our leading goal-scorer, on a pace to score 36-40.
It does feel like a bandaid move, though. I can see them doing it, but I’d prefer they resist the now mentality and try to work on either a) getting one of their young offensive talents geared up (which means playing them warts and all) or B) pursue someone much younger than Kreider.
thehockeywriters.com
Absolutely
If it were for say Coyle and small add, I would do it.
