Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,805
5,248
I feel like Poitras wasn’t even close to the worst forward. Maybe I’m bias.
I just did not see him improving, best move at this time.

Wants to see a virtual rookie have more impact on the game but coyle and Freddie with like 3 points each, that’s cool

I really despise our coach
I think they have more of a track record than Poitras.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins and Kegs

Aussie Bruin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
10,963
25,511
Victoria, Aus
Yeah, the numbers don't feel right in this case. I think he did better out of the gate, so maybe a lot of those positive numbers came early on when he was on a line with Frederic and Geekie, but it feels like he's struggling lately. I also think he struggles when he moves higher in the lineup... Lately, it seems like he's turning the puck over in bad spots more than most, like at the blue lines. Lastly, I see him peel off puck battles where he should be pressuring and the peel off leads to easy exits. To me, it does seem like he's become confused about when to press, when to back off, how to back off so you don't give up numbers, etc.

Not that that's necessarily all Poitras' fault. "Not understanding the system" is on the coach as much as it is on the player. I'm sure he wants to learn, I'm sure he's available for video sessions. The same comments were made about Zadorov the other day. "Doesn't fully understand the system, when to go, when not to go." Again, that's not really all on the player.

Yeah his last 3 games have been a battle. Corsi and SF sub 43%, xGF under 36%, just 2 high danger changes generated. Struggling for impact, and I do see him make mistakes and seem to get a bit lost/confused sometimes. So I agree on that. How much that's just acceptable growing pains is the question. Also agree that this seems to be yet another case where coaching may well be at least partly at fault. Could also be that he's simply feeling the strain from all the hits and general wear and tear.

Ultimately I don't have a hard view on it. If he'd stayed up I'd have been fine, but sending him down is not a terrible call nor should it do him any harm at this stage of his career.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,805
5,248
Yeah cause they’ve been in the league a lot longer

It’s a stupid move, it’s lazy and it’s ignorant
How is lazy and ignorant ? the kid was not getting it done, plain and simple to many fans , drool all over themselves when it come to this kid, sorry he does not belong in the NHL at this time.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: drkfluff

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
26,333
29,304
Medfield, MA
The lines are back to pairs...

Geekie - Zacha - Pastrnak
March - Lindholm
- Brazeau
Frederic - Coyle - Johnson
Beecher - Kastelic - Koepke

I think the pairs makes sense and we're strong down the middle. Imagine that top line with a Bertuzzi type and maybe we'd have something.

The Lindholm line has been very strong at 5on5 in terms of possession; 24 shot attempts for, 10 against, 86% expected goals. (And 2 goals for, none against.)

Frederic and Coyle is a tried and true, dedendable pair. I think Johnson is a placeholder for Poitras there, but should do some good things there for now.

4th line is back in black. They should be good as well.

All comes back to the 1st line though. Without a 1st line that can outscore the other team, we become so much easier to defend.
 
Last edited:

Kegs

Registered User
Nov 10, 2010
4,178
5,013
Wants to see a virtual rookie have more impact on the game but coyle and Freddie with like 3 points each, that’s cool

I really despise our coach
I’m not loving the coach this year. Was this his decision? The power play, the 6 on 5 play, his line shuffling endlessly. Maybe I’m looking for a scapegoat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,675
46,511
At the Cross
youtu.be
The lines are back to pairs...

Geekie - Zacha - Pastrnak
March - Lindholm
- Brazeau
Frederic - Coyle - Johnson
Beecher - Kastelic - Koepke

I think the pairs makes sense and we're strong down the middle. Imagine that top line with a Bertuzzi type and maybe we'd have something.

The Lindholm line has been very strong at 5on5 in terms of possession; 24 shot attempts for, 10 against, 86% expected goals. (And 2 goals for, none against.)

Frederic and Coyle is a tried and true, dedendable pair. I think Johnson is a placeholder for Poitras there, but should do some good things there for now.

4th line is back in black. They should be good as well.

All comes back to the 1st line though. Without a 1st line that can outscore the other team, we become so much easier to defend.
the lines or pairs or whatever suck. You have a 4th liner / healthy scratch on each of the top three lines. I assume many of us here watch a lot of hockey, that top 9 is a disaster.

4th liner-2nd liner-1st liner
2nd liner (well not even strength)-2nd liner-4th liner
3rd liner-3rd liner-guy who should be retired
4th liner-4th liner-4th liner.

I love the Bruins, but this is 90's shit.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,675
46,511
At the Cross
youtu.be
He can still develop. I don't think its permanent. He's 20. We have played like shit. He wont be the last roster change we'll see. Dont see reason to gnash teeth.
The plan is apparent. The division once again stinks. The goal is A2/A3, have 3-4 home play-off games added to your 41 sellouts and it's the Sinden era again

Merkulov is a PPG in Providence, but let go w Geekie. Lysell is an afterthought now with his injury (even if he's back they aren't calling him up) so lets go w Brazeau...and they sent one of their better playmakers down because Monty isn't happy with his "structure" and scratching him so they can go with Tyler ****ing Johnson.
 

Kegs

Registered User
Nov 10, 2010
4,178
5,013
The plan is apparent. The division once again stinks. The goal is A2/A3, have 3-4 home play-off games added to your 41 sellouts and it's the Sinden era again

Merkulov is a PPG in Providence, but let go w Geekie. Lysell is an afterthought now with his injury (even if he's back they aren't calling him up) so lets go w Brazeau...and they sent one of their better playmakers down because Monty isn't happy with his "structure" and scratching him so they can go with Tyler ****ing Johnson.


I did watch a providence game this year. He looks good at the ahl level but I feel like he is slow and kinda small. I doubt he can impact the game at the nhl level.

He was making plays when I watched him though. Maybe he will get a look. I’d rather lysell step it up.
 
Last edited:

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,675
46,511
At the Cross
youtu.be
I didn’t watch a providence game this year. He looks good at the ahl level but I feel like he is slow and kinda small. I doubt he can impact the game at the nhl level.

He was making plays when I watched him though. Maybe he will get a look. I’d rather lysell step it up.
He's been given all of 4 games in the NHL. Bruins need to understand these guys need a shot, with good players and you'll have to live with some mistakes. They have zero tolerance for whatever reason

The guy put 80 plus and 78 points in a year in his career. Plus he was a selke runner up . Hes solid .
averages 22/34/56 per 82 in his career. Not a #1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad