Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VI

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,593
26,762
Medfield, MA
Coyle's regular season ppg ave is around .51
Lindholm's regular season ppg ave is around .68
But let's assume your discussion points are an accurate assessment of Coyle's ability ... then there should be no problem or drop off of his new found production by having him carry another line apart from Marchand.
I don't have anything against Coyle I think he is a valuable player for what he brings to the team. But I do think pairing him with Marchand is stifling Marchand's production while enhancing Coyle's production.
I think both players could bring more overall benefit to the team success apart than they do paired together ... especially now that we have options. Last year we didn’t have these options, they were paired out of necessity.
The difference in their career production is PP time.

And yes, if you put Coyle back at 3c (without Marchand) his even strength production would be about the same. He scored 44 even strength points with Marchand last year, and he scored 40 even strength points the year before without Marchand. Again, the biggest uptick in his production last year was from special teams.

You're also saying Coyle brings Marchand down, but Marchand had 67 points with Coyle and 67 points the year before, without Coyle. To be more specific, he had 37 even strength points with Coyle and 37 even strength points the year before, without Coyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAD

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,918
10,990
NWO
What is interesting is that the two duos we know have chemistry, Marchand + Pasta and Frederic + Coyle aren’t together.
Just my thoughts on the logic behind it, but if you know they have chemistry then there's no reason to play them together this early. Try out other combinations and see what clicks with the knowledge that you can always go back to this if it doesnt work out
 

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
26,350
22,984
Coyle has never received the credit that he deserves since he came here. 25 goals last year and 60 points, oh well this offense is so good lets drop Coyle down in the lineup, that will solve everything.

For me it’s not about punishing Coyle, it’s about structuring the lineup in way that gives them balanced scoring and advantages as much as possible.

If Coyle anchors line three and he’s truly a 2C, then in every game they play the Bruins are at an advantage if he’s used as a 3.

Admittedly, it’s too early for all of this and none of us is even sure of what we have here this year.

I just don’t want to find them become a one line offense in the playoffs again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAD and PlayMakers

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,593
26,762
Medfield, MA
Fair.

I guess the fact that Coyle proved to be 2C worthy makes me even more happy about being able to use him at 3C though.

Of course this is provided that they can find a way to make lines 1 & 2 legitimate.

I guess I just don't see the advantage. If Poitras is a 2c right now then aren't we getting the same matchup advantage vs 3rd lines. Whether it's Coyle or Poitras it's a 2c vs 3c's, at least against most teams.

And again, the Marchand line matches up against top lines. Coyle did that all last season. I don't see the upside in asking Poitras to take on that responsibility right away.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,593
26,762
Medfield, MA
Brazeau-Zacha-Pasta (Can Brazeau be a Bertuzzi type?)
Marchand-Lindholm-Coyle (play against top lines, most ES TOI)
Frederic-Poitras-Geekie (matchup advantage)
 

dugg133

Registered User
Jan 11, 2023
1,565
3,940
What is interesting is that the two duos we know have chemistry, Marchand + Pasta and Frederic + Coyle aren’t together.
I think the logic in keeping marchand and pasta separate is that it evens out the scoring a bit. That logic kinda falls apart if the 2nd line is dogshit though lol.

Random idea but I think Beecher has looked awesome through 3 games, so what about running something like this:

zacha-lindholm-pasta
marchand-coyle-frederic
beecher-poitras-geekie
koepke-kastelic-brazeau

Or maybe swap Koepke and Beecher if you wanna keep beecher and kastelic together as your dzone specialist line? Idk just feels inevitable to me that they need to eventually move Freddy to 2RW, that's the best option we have on the team to fill that spot right now. And Poitras had pretty good chemistry with Geekie early on last season, so that line could still be solid if they can find a third guy that works with them.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad