The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 30,135
- 47,532
It makes for a very interesting conversation for sure.I said it the other day. It could just make so many things awkward. So do we take him?
It makes for a very interesting conversation for sure.I said it the other day. It could just make so many things awkward. So do we take him?
So you’re speculating. Fair enough.He hasn’t had the chance to draft this high before and his seat has never been hotter
Also, he’s an idiot
I’d love Command as well.I'm with HockeyBasedNYC
If Stenberg or Reid fall to us I'll throw a party.
I like Smits a lot but if that their guy I'd sooner trade down to 7 or 8, but I understand the risks involved.
The guy I really want in the second half is Command, but that would be a pretty costly trade up. We had to move the Grabner 2nd just to go up a few spots to get Miller in 2018.
I’m not so worried about the concussion thing. It’s not like we’ve heard there’s some history of it. He came back and played only missing two games, but sure, due diligence.On the Carels concussion what does anyone actually know about it? I just heard he had been concussed in the WHL playoffs but I also thought he came back to play before the end of his team's playoffs. There is some post lingering stuff?
Players do get concussed and sometimes it's not all that serious. I did listen to Carels talking to a Vancouver interviewer 3/4 weeks back about his preference to stay in Western Canada or the subject came up from that Vancouver guy. Vancouver picks 3rd and if they take Malhotra....they pick next at 24. Carels is going to be gone before 24. Calgary 6, Seattle 7, Winnipeg (which is about the midpoint between east and west) is 8. If the Rangers take Smits instead of Carels IMO he'll probably go to one of those teams unless Vancouver moves up with another pick in that range.
I kind of wonder though if there is some kind of maneuvering going on Carels and his agents part to make sure he lands out west. Maybe it was bad concussion but I kind of have the feeling he doesn't want to be in the East. That said there should be some medical on him available but concussions or backs it can be really hard to say.
If the Rangers really want him more than Smits or Bjorck....they should do a deeper dive on all of that and get a real sense about whether Carels would like to play in NYC or not. Otherwise I'd rather we go with Smits or Bjorck.
Chytil, Sauer...
Crosby comes to mind.I mean if we want to worst case it sure.
I can probably rip of 10 guys who had "issues" and were "one hit away" who ended up playing a f***load after the fact.
The whole situation reads like a Calgary led psy op to get him to fall to their pick.On the Carels concussion what does anyone actually know about it? I just heard he had been concussed in the WHL playoffs but I also thought he came back to play before the end of his team's playoffs. There is some post lingering stuff?
Players do get concussed and sometimes it's not all that serious. I did listen to Carels talking to a Vancouver interviewer 3/4 weeks back about his preference to stay in Western Canada or the subject came up from that Vancouver guy. Vancouver picks 3rd and if they take Malhotra....they pick next at 24. Carels is going to be gone before 24. Calgary 6, Seattle 7, Winnipeg (which is about the midpoint between east and west) is 8. If the Rangers take Smits instead of Carels IMO he'll probably go to one of those teams unless Vancouver moves up with another pick in that range.
I kind of wonder though if there is some kind of maneuvering going on Carels and his agents part to make sure he lands out west. Maybe it was bad concussion but I kind of have the feeling he doesn't want to be in the East. That said there should be some medical on him available but concussions or backs it can be really hard to say.
If the Rangers really want him more than Smits or Bjorck....they should do a deeper dive on all of that and get a real sense about whether Carels would like to play in NYC or not. Otherwise I'd rather we go with Smits or Bjorck.
The whole situation reads like a Calgary led psy op to get him to fall to their pick.
The Rangers need a win at this pick. Drury knows his job is on the line if he f***s this pick up. He's going to go for the most sure thing with the highest upside. Reid and Smits fit that profile as does Malhotra. Bjorck too. Verhoeff too unfortunately.
I can't imagine any team is leaking their lists at this stage, nor do i imagine any teams list has really changed in the last week or so.Chatter that now Malhotra might be available at 5? That will absolutely be Drury’s pick if he’s there
Still think he's not getting past Chicago. They're looking for someone to slot in behind Bedard.Chatter that now Malhotra might be available at 5? That will absolutely be Drury’s pick if he’s there
what about nazar? i feel like they need a LD or W way more than a centerStill think he's not getting past Chicago. They're looking for someone to slot in behind Bedard.
Winger. Don't think he's a center long term.what about nazar? i feel like they need a LD or W way more than a center
Still think he's not getting past Chicago. They're looking for someone to slot in behind Bedard.
Nazar and Frondell are wingers. Moore I'd be surprised if he was more than a role player when all is said and done.They've got Nazar, Frondell, and Oliver Moore too
Oh not me. It was super exciting getting Kakko and Lafreniere. Even Lias and Krav, the lead ups were very exciting.I’m more excited for the draft this year then I ever was during the rebuild.
I'm kind of surprised that you're low on Moore. I would've expected that he fits the mold of an archetype of a player you'd love. I really like Chicago's group of forwards. I was super high on Nazar in his draft year, and I still think he's going to be a borderline star player once he fully develops. I disagree on Frondell and think he's going t be your prototypical two-way C once he settles in too. If CHI needs anything, it's more diversity in their player archetypes because they've leaned a bit too much into the speed/skill angle, and I don't know if that group has the versatility to change their play once they face teams that are tougher defensively - similar along the lines of what MTL ran into when they got snuffed out by CAR in the ECF.Nazar and Frondell are wingers. Moore I'd be surprised if he was more than a role player when all is said and done.
like ZibanejadI mean if we want to worst case it sure.
I can probably rip of 10 guys who had "issues" and were "one hit away" who ended up playing a f***load after the fact.
How many times we heard about Crosby or Ekblad and they keep playing. Sometimes you get a Lindros, Sauer, Beukeboom, sometimes you get a Crosby, Ekblad in terms of head injuriesI mean if we want to worst case it sure.
I can probably rip of 10 guys who had "issues" and were "one hit away" who ended up playing a f***load after the fact.
I do like Moore. I thought he was a safe bet to be an NHL player and still think he will be a good contributor. I never had him having more than a low end 2C/good 3C upside, however.I'm kind of surprised that you're low on Moore. I would've expected that he fits the mold of an archetype of a player you'd love. I really like Chicago's group of forwards. I was super high on Nazar in his draft year, and I still think he's going to be a borderline star player once he fully develops. I disagree on Frondell and think he's going t be your prototypical two-way C once he settles in too. If CHI needs anything, it's more diversity in their player archetypes because they've leaned a bit too much into the speed/skill angle, and I don't know if that group has the versatility to change their play once they face teams that are tougher defensively - similar along the lines of what MTL ran into when they got snuffed out by CAR in the ECF.
If CHI needs anything, it's a bit more experience on the backend and some higher-end talent to support Vlasic (absolute stud) and Rinzel. Maybe those guys just need some more time to actualize, but I don't think they can afford to be patient much longer with Bedard getting a bit antsy.