2026 NHL CBA negotiations, issues

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,343
11,142
Charlotte, NC

Betrman would like to start negotiations in January and have completed deal by June, months before expiration.

Article mentions a number of potential CBA discussions. Including reducing preseason games to four, and adding two RS games.

Just as a thing, but this rhetoric is vastly different than the rhetoric before any of the lockouts:

“We think we’re collectively, in terms of the relationship, in a good place.”

“My guess is, on either side, we’re not talking about fundamental changes,” Bettman said this weekend on The Varsity podcast with John Ourand. “I think we’re looking at things we’d each like to see improved in the Collective Bargaining Agreement, but I’m not concerned that we’re looking at something will take us down a road nobody wants to go down.”
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,274
13,595

Betrman would like to start negotiations in January and have completed deal by June, months before expiration.

Article mentions a number of potential CBA discussions. Including reducing preseason games to four, and adding two RS games.
So that would be over a year in advance then.
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,893
9,979
Acton, Ontario
Check out this Podcast: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly 32 Thoughts: The podcast

32 Thoughts podcast. Friedman has waiver wire suggestion about 70 minutes in. Put previous claiming team at bottom of waiver priority.
That's a "no thanks" from me

The NHL is good at knee jerk reactions to things that happen exactly as the CBA designed it to happen but that are rare



Bumping waiver priority will just deter any use of the waiver system
 
  • Like
Reactions: mouser

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,610
13,123
South Mountain
Seems crazy that is not already a thing. Would allow teams to load manage better to ensure they are fit and ready to go for the playoffs.

Teams are already given enough cap and roster space to carry a 3rd goaltender temporarily or permanently as the team sees fit.

There are two semi-related, but independent issues going on in my view:

A) Teams who don’t leave themselves enough cap space to call up a 3rd goaltender temporarily when injuries happen.

B) Teams trying to send their waiver eligible 3rd goaltender to the AHL, when there will be teams missing a 2nd tender or dealing with injuries prepared to claim that goaltender for their NHL roster. Even if that claim turns out to be short term and the goaltender is on waivers again in upcoming weeks.


Again in my opine:

(A) Is a problem of the team’s own creating. A CBA change shouldn’t be necessary to resolve a self-inflicted cap space shortage.

(B) I’d guess overall more goaltenders benefit by being claimed on waivers than harmed. Many examples of 3rd/4th string goaltenders who got their breakout with the opportunity to be a 2nd or even temporary 1st on another team.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,164
11,305
So that would be over a year in advance then.
Well, CBA is set to expire in September 2026, but just before entering the final year, all ELC are then hit at their bonus amounts, and I assume all veteran ones as well, and not just the $925K base salary for the top prospect as without a future year of the current CBA, there are no assurances that bonuses will carryover as per the current CBA.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad