2026-27 Roster | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2026-27 Roster

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.

What should the Hawks do next season?


  • Total voters
    71

Northernhawk

Registered User
Feb 22, 2020
2,890
1,691
I know the 2025-26 season hasn’t begun yet but with both the Nazar and Knight extensions being signed and a Bedard extension coming, I thought let’s look at what coming for NEXT season…

UFA losses of Weber, Foligno, Murphy, Dickinson, Mikheyev, Brossoit and Lafferty will total $30 million

Blackhawks are already $16 million under the cap this season

Estimations are the cap will hit $100 million so another $7 million increase(maybe)

So $53 million in cap space…

Bedard will garner between $10-14 million depending on length(max deal or bridge deal)

Pending RFAs are Bedard(as mentioned), Reichel, Korchinski, Allan, Dach, Del Mastro, Commesso, Mast and Kuzmin

Should be interesting!
 
2026-27 Signed players(by cap hit)
F1-Nazar
F2-Burakovsky
F3-Bertuzzi
F4-Teravainen
F5-Donato
F6-Frondell
F7-Greene
F8-Moore
F9-Slaggert
F10-Lardis
F11-Bedard when resigned
F12-Reichel when resigned
F13-Dach when resigned
F14-Kantserov when and if he signs
D1-Vlasic
D2-Kaiser
D3-Levshunov
D4-Rinzel
D5-Crevier
D6-Korchinski when resigned
D7-Del Mastro when resigned
G1-Knight
G2-Soderblom

$53 million to play with!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bwana63
Kantserov will most likely be there. Also I have to think Savoie will as well as they really need a guy like that. Plus that roster is likely going to be below the cap floor even if Bedard gets $14M.

IDK if there's another Shea Weber contract out there but I have to think they're going to sign or trade for 2-3 guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
Not sure how we're ever going to be able to replace Weber & Broissoit!

Guys whose contracts end next year: TT, Burakovsky, Slaggert (RFA) So we've got 3 more forward spots opening up after next year for the guys in the pipeline.
 
So because I'm kind of addicted to the dopamine of future roster building and planning, I have thought of numerous scenarios already how that season's lineup could look like. It's going to be a seriously entertaining season, where most of our young impact guys hit the floor. (Sorry for long post)

I see four basic scenarios:

1) Most conservative

This is where our 26 pick isn't NHL ready, Frondell and Lardis need AHL time (but Moore and Kantserov are ready, I think that's a given). We also don't sign any impact FAs.

Moore - Bedard - Donato
Teravainen - Nazar - Bertuzzi
Burakovsky - Kantserov - Slaggert
Dach - Green - Savoie

Well, that bottom line could be any mix of FA vets as well.

This is what I would consider a really bad outcome to the off-season but luckily I also think it is the least likely to happen.

2) Young top prospects make it out of camp

Frondell, Lardis, Moore and Kantserov are NHL ready out of camp and the youth injection is on. Out 26 pick is lower than top 3, and needs some more time in junior/AHL/wherever. We don't sign any impact FAs.

Teravainen - Bedard - Frondell
Donato - Nazar - Lardis
Moore - Kantserov - Bertuzzi
Burakovsky - Dach - Slaggert

This is a nice transition mix. One vet for each line, lots of youth, skill and speed. I like this option very much, and feels like still a conservatively realistic outlook but one that acknowledges the level of our young guys coming in.

3) We end up picking in the top 3, selecting McKenna or Stenlund

I think for now at least, those are the two forwards that look NHL ready. Of course it could change by the end of the season, but I think they both make the show next year. Let's say we pick 2/3 and select Ivar. We aren't able to sign any impact FAs though.

Stenlund - Bedard - Donato
Bertuzzi - Nazar - Lardis
Frondell - Kantserov - Teravainen
Burakovsky - Moore - Dach

Now this would be a great roster already. So much skill, so much speed, so much potential. We would be the youngest, most promising roster in the league. And I don't think personally, that it's that far fetched. Needs some luck and the developmental projections arent exactly conservative with all the impact top prospects making the jump, but still.

4) And then where everything happens

So the above scenarios didn't have any FA signings, but we are all speculating about that, from fans to media, so I think it's kind of realistic to at least expect KD will make a run at someone. At least try. I think the realistic ones are Necas and Kaprizov (McDavid and Connor re-sign imo) and in terms of age and style Necas is the better fit. I don't know if we can land him (or that it's the best way forward because it could push some youngsters out, or be a Tavares cap situation), but let's speculate. This one is obviously the most optimistic, kind of unrealistic scenario, where everything goes out way.

Frondell - Bedard - Necas
Stenlund - Nazar - Donato
Bertuzzi - Kantserov - Lardis
Burakovksy - Moore - Teravainen

Absolutely stacked. We'd be the most improved team in the league by far. Actually the FA almost feels like overkill looking.

------------

In all the above, I kind of assume that the d-core will be pretty set:

Vlasic - Rinzel
Kaiser - Levshunov
Korchinski - Del Mastro
Crevier

Maybe KK isn't ready or is traded, but the rest are locks next year imo.

-------------

Anyways, these are all day dreamings obviously, doesn't account for injuries, trades, improved or halted developmental paths etc.

But I think two important things are clear. One - we have a lot of options, the roster and the prospect pool is very, very versatile. The lines are very different in the above, because I tried to balance them for effectiveness - and it goes to show we have a lot of complimentary skillsets going forward.

And two - the future is very bright. It might not all happen next year necessarily, but the guys will super close to hitting. Exciting times!
 
So because I'm kind of addicted to the dopamine of future roster building and planning, I have thought of numerous scenarios already how that season's lineup could look like. It's going to be a seriously entertaining season, where most of our young impact guys hit the floor. (Sorry for long post)

I see four basic scenarios:

1) Most conservative

This is where our 26 pick isn't NHL ready, Frondell and Lardis need AHL time (but Moore and Kantserov are ready, I think that's a given). We also don't sign any impact FAs.

Moore - Bedard - Donato
Teravainen - Nazar - Bertuzzi
Burakovsky - Kantserov - Slaggert
Dach - Green - Savoie

Well, that bottom line could be any mix of FA vets as well.

This is what I would consider a really bad outcome to the off-season but luckily I also think it is the least likely to happen.

2) Young top prospects make it out of camp

Frondell, Lardis, Moore and Kantserov are NHL ready out of camp and the youth injection is on. Out 26 pick is lower than top 3, and needs some more time in junior/AHL/wherever. We don't sign any impact FAs.

Teravainen - Bedard - Frondell
Donato - Nazar - Lardis
Moore - Kantserov - Bertuzzi
Burakovsky - Dach - Slaggert

This is a nice transition mix. One vet for each line, lots of youth, skill and speed. I like this option very much, and feels like still a conservatively realistic outlook but one that acknowledges the level of our young guys coming in.

3) We end up picking in the top 3, selecting McKenna or Stenlund

I think for now at least, those are the two forwards that look NHL ready. Of course it could change by the end of the season, but I think they both make the show next year. Let's say we pick 2/3 and select Ivar. We aren't able to sign any impact FAs though.

Stenlund - Bedard - Donato
Bertuzzi - Nazar - Lardis
Frondell - Kantserov - Teravainen
Burakovsky - Moore - Dach

Now this would be a great roster already. So much skill, so much speed, so much potential. We would be the youngest, most promising roster in the league. And I don't think personally, that it's that far fetched. Needs some luck and the developmental projections arent exactly conservative with all the impact top prospects making the jump, but still.

4) And then where everything happens

So the above scenarios didn't have any FA signings, but we are all speculating about that, from fans to media, so I think it's kind of realistic to at least expect KD will make a run at someone. At least try. I think the realistic ones are Necas and Kaprizov (McDavid and Connor re-sign imo) and in terms of age and style Necas is the better fit. I don't know if we can land him (or that it's the best way forward because it could push some youngsters out, or be a Tavares cap situation), but let's speculate. This one is obviously the most optimistic, kind of unrealistic scenario, where everything goes out way.

Frondell - Bedard - Necas
Stenlund - Nazar - Donato
Bertuzzi - Kantserov - Lardis
Burakovksy - Moore - Teravainen

Absolutely stacked. We'd be the most improved team in the league by far. Actually the FA almost feels like overkill looking.

------------

In all the above, I kind of assume that the d-core will be pretty set:

Vlasic - Rinzel
Kaiser - Levshunov
Korchinski - Del Mastro
Crevier

Maybe KK isn't ready or is traded, but the rest are locks next year imo.

-------------

Anyways, these are all day dreamings obviously, doesn't account for injuries, trades, improved or halted developmental paths etc.

But I think two important things are clear. One - we have a lot of options, the roster and the prospect pool is very, very versatile. The lines are very different in the above, because I tried to balance them for effectiveness - and it goes to show we have a lot of complimentary skillsets going forward.

And two - the future is very bright. It might not all happen next year necessarily, but the guys will super close to hitting. Exciting times!
6.) It's 2009

Kaprizov-McDavid-Bedard
Frondell-Nazar-McKenna
Lardis-Kantserov-Teravainen
Moore-Donato-Bertuzzi
Burakovsky

Vlasic-Levshunov
Kaiser-Rinzel
Korchinski-Del Maestro
Crevier

Knight
Commesso
 
I didn't realize that Necas doesn't like playing wing and prefers to play center and that's why he's unhappy. So I might pump the brakes on that. There's also Alex Tuch to consider who could fit well onto this team.

They are going to have to sign someone to be cap compliant next year unless they pay Bedard like $20M just to hit the floor which would be rather dumb. But given everything that has happened so far with pending UFAs not extending with their current teams, who will make it to the open market. And once they do, there's this dichotomy of teams contending with a short window (Colorado, Tampa, Florida, Vegas, Toronto), teams on the upswing that could be a contender with an addition or 2 (Chicago, San Jose, Columbus, Anaheim, Utah, NYI, Montreal), Dallas, and a whole bunch of slop (LA, Buffalo, Detroit, Boston)

They all come with their own combination of history, living conditions, media scrutiny, taxes, and chance to win a cup early or later into the deal. God I hope all the big names make it to July 1 without contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
6.) It's 2009

Kaprizov-McDavid-Bedard
Frondell-Nazar-McKenna
Lardis-Kantserov-Teravainen
Moore-Donato-Bertuzzi
Burakovsky

Vlasic-Levshunov
Kaiser-Rinzel
Korchinski-Del Maestro
Crevier

Knight
Commesso
If it really was 2009, we'd be screaming into the oblivion that Nazar doesn't win enough faceoffs.
 
I didn't realize that Necas doesn't like playing wing and prefers to play center and that's why he's unhappy. So I might pump the brakes on that. There's also Alex Tuch to consider who could fit well onto this team.

They are going to have to sign someone to be cap compliant next year unless they pay Bedard like $20M just to hit the floor which would be rather dumb. But given everything that has happened so far with pending UFAs not extending with their current teams, who will make it to the open market. And once they do, there's this dichotomy of teams contending with a short window (Colorado, Tampa, Florida, Vegas, Toronto), teams on the upswing that could be a contender with an addition or 2 (Chicago, San Jose, Columbus, Anaheim, Utah, NYI, Montreal), Dallas, and a whole bunch of slop (LA, Buffalo, Detroit, Boston)

They all come with their own combination of history, living conditions, media scrutiny, taxes, and chance to win a cup early or later into the deal. God I hope all the big names make it to July 1 without contracts.

He carries a lot of risk for sure. He's been unhappy at two teams now, wants to play center and even his production has been inconsistent. But I think the biggest weakness is his avoidance of contact and poor defensive play, just because we need more of the opposite next to Bedard, Lardis etc.

So hes not the ideal fit. But he has two things going for him - he will only barely turn 27 when he hits the market which is at least a good 2 years younger than Kaprizov, Connor etc. And he's one of the fastest players in the league which will attract KD like crazy.

I'm a sucker for homegrown talent and success stories, so I'm not advocating for a must FA signings, but I think that's not how the real world plays, and attempts will have to be made. I just think KD is too in love with speed not to make a play for one of the fastest players if they make it to FA.

Btw Tuch is a great shout. He has the compete too so even more of a KD type. But I don't know if we need middle six talent like him, because a lot of young guys are coming. Is rather keep the spots for them, unless it's a true difference maker FA target.
 
1759152753756.png


Here's a list of 30 names - a mix of vets signed next year, RFAs up for extension, young NHL players, prospects, and draft picks for 12/13 spots next year.

I realize not all prospects work out but the top 18 are either already established, have a realistic shot having an NHL career, or will likely be ready for an NHL job except maybe Vanacker. This doesn't even include potential free agents or any future draft picks after their 1st next year.

My point is that it is very likely that some guys we like are getting traded and that is fine. Reichel is probably an easy one but even if they trade him and don't sign anyone next offseason, which I don't believe will be the case, they're going to have too many players moving forward. Trading some of the 'bottom' guys like Slaggert, Savoie, Greene, or maybe Vanacker might come to mind but I don't think a package of those guys get us what we need in a top 6 difference maker. I think someone toward the top of the list moves for a star.

Yeah you can have the remainder play in Rockford but a lot of these ELCs are going to expire and then what do you do? It's going to be interesting what KD does with this surplus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan
Kasparov signs. with the salary cap going up just does not feel like top 6 or top 4 guys move teams much. everybody has space. I know you cannot only build thru the draft but it will be scraps on the UFA market so that means trades and draft and develop. which means its going to take longer then it was a few years ago. IMO. you need to deal with the hand you are dealt. good thing is hawks have alot of players and picks.
 
Well if we would have signed Kaprizov to 8 X 17 here, I'd be excited for the next season but let me just say that I'm not all that disappointed we're not paying him that.

He has injury concerns and the back half of that deal could be real ugly especially when it's time to start extending our kids.
 
Damn that Kaprizov contract is terrible. I get the Wild is not a premium destination and they likely have to overpay to keep him, but yuck for a small winger that has a fair amount of recent injury history. Boldy being signed to a bit of a bargain with some term and Faber being locked in long term may end up giving them enough runway to make it work somehow. In no world is Kaprizov worth 42% more than Marner and Rantanen who just signed new deals (and certainly did that knowing where the cap is going to) or Draisitl who is 22% cheaper and plays a premium position who also has a newish contract.

That deal has the feel of the Parise/Ryan Suter twin abomination deals that you knew were not going to win anything of significance and were going to end poorly. Likely playoff team, that will be cap constrained to not be able to add the pieces to be an actual Cup contender....very Nashvillesque.
 
Kasparov signs. with the salary cap going up just does not feel like top 6 or top 4 guys move teams much. everybody has space. I know you cannot only build thru the draft but it will be scraps on the UFA market so that means trades and draft and develop. which means its going to take longer then it was a few years ago. IMO. you need to deal with the hand you are dealt. good thing is hawks have alot of players and picks.
This was my thought as well. With the cap going up significantly - it's unlikely that there will be "upper tier" UFA's available unless they want to leave their current situation (for whatever reason), and for the most part not because of a cap crunch like in the past.
 
Damn that Kaprizov contract is terrible. I get the Wild is not a premium destination and they likely have to overpay to keep him, but yuck for a small winger that has a fair amount of recent injury history. Boldy being signed to a bit of a bargain with some term and Faber being locked in long term may end up giving them enough runway to make it work somehow. In no world is Kaprizov worth 42% more than Marner and Rantanen who just signed new deals (and certainly did that knowing where the cap is going to) or Draisitl who is 22% cheaper and plays a premium position who also has a newish contract.

That deal has the feel of the Parise/Ryan Suter twin abomination deals that you knew were not going to win anything of significance and were going to end poorly. Likely playoff team, that will be cap constrained to not be able to add the pieces to be an actual Cup contender....very Nashvillesque.
Isn't Dallas and Vegas, no tax zones, which would explain some of the salary difference.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad