What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerOn RDS they're saying maybe because he had one foot on the bench. They don't know for sure but IIHF have different rules. We'll see I guessNot sure how that's not offside.
Guys on the NHL Network just confirmed that's the rule and why the goal was upheld. Augustine should have stopped it to make it moot.On RDS they're saying maybe because he had one foot on the bench. They don't know for sure but IIHF have different rules. We'll see I guess
It was actually because one foot was on the bench, he is considered off the ice. Confirmed by the announcers on NHL Network.If he had carried the puck across its off-side, but he didn't. It's the Makar call again.
Our future is doomed if our youth chooses to cut their hair like this View attachment 951628
UhhhhhOur future is doomed if our youth chooses to cut their hair like this View attachment 951628