Speculation: 2025 Trade/Free Agency Thread

I think reworking the bottom 6 is just as important as adding another top 6 forward

A bottom-6 who is a FO and PK specialist with speed would be great! Winning a FO on the PK with a clear will eat up 20-25 seconds. According to NHL.com, we rank last in the league in overall FO% with 44.4% and 23rd in PK FO% with 43.5%. Just for kicks and giggles, our PP FO% is at 43.8%, which ranks last in the league. Guess we need a FO specialist in the top-6 and bottom-6.
 
Win more faceoffs, win more battles and get stronger defensively - and our top six guys will get more time with the puck and more o-zone starts like the wave of a magic wand. We badly need a veteran defensive C who wins draws at a high clip.
What I'd hope for is that we sign Nico Sturm, and two of Anthony Beauvillier, Andrew Mangiapane, Taylor Raddysh, Joel Armia, Alex Iafallo, or Brandon Tanev. I'd probably be willing to sign Marner or maybe Ehlers but I'd avoid the Bennett/Nelson second tier of free agents as I think those are the most likely to not be worth their contracts. Probably have to trade for a top 6 guy which is fine with me.

So something like

Zegras-Carlsson-top 6 add
Gauthier-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Armia
Killorn-Sturm-Tanev
 
For sure, but even adding actual 4th liners to this group would be an upgrade. Johnston/Harkins aren't NHL players, Leason and Lundestrom provide nothing offensively and get caved in possession-wise, McGinn would be better suited as a 13th forward on a contender and Fabbri's OKish when healthy but he's hurt all the time.

Well okay but other than that, things are pretty good right?

1000002296.gif
 
What I'd hope for is that we sign Nico Sturm, and two of Anthony Beauvillier, Andrew Mangiapane, Taylor Raddysh, Joel Armia, Alex Iafallo, or Brandon Tanev. I'd probably be willing to sign Marner or maybe Ehlers but I'd avoid the Bennett/Nelson second tier of free agents as I think those are the most likely to not be worth their contracts. Probably have to trade for a top 6 guy which is fine with me.

So something like

Zegras-Carlsson-top 6 add
Gauthier-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Armia
Killorn-Sturm-Tanev

What happens to players like Colangelo and Nesterenko? Colangelo, in particular, has been consistently scoring and positively impacting play. Adding two top 6 forwards is what they really need to push Killorn and Strome down but it's unrealistic. One top 6 forward and a bottom six center makes sense and doable. But adding 4 forwards seems like too many. Some combination of:

Gauthier-Carlssson-xxx
Killorn-Zegras-Terry
Vatrano-McTavish-Colangelo
Nesterenko-xxx-Strome
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84
What happens to players like Colangelo and Nesterenko? Colangelo, in particular, has been consistently scoring and positively impacting play. Adding two top 6 forwards is what they really need to push Killorn and Strome down but it's unrealistic. One top 6 forward and a bottom six center makes sense and doable. But adding 4 forwards seems like too many. Some combination of:

Gauthier-Carlssson-xxx
Killorn-Zegras-Terry
Vatrano-McTavish-Colangelo
Nesterenko-xxx-Strome
Depth
 
Dany Heatley signing with the Sharks comes to mind. I guess you could make an argument for Kovalchuk coming out of retirement and signing with Kings as well, but that one falls closer to Fedorov than Neidermayer.

Edit - Nevermind Heatley, forgot that was a trade.
Pretty much all trades, including Jumbo Joe.
 
I've been critical of Verbeek for certain decisions but I can't blame him for not getting players who have no desire to play in California. I offered a challenge yesterday to provide a list of all the top tier UFA's that have been signed by ANY California team in the last 30-35 years. Someone mentioned Neidermayer. Still waiting for another. Fedorov was well into his 30s when he signed with the Ducks which doesn't really match the age range that Verbeek should be aiming for IMO.

The top tier this year is Marner, Ehlers, Bennett, and Boeser. So mathematically the Ducks have a 1/8 or 12.5% chance of getting one of them. That's a tough bet to take.
I think there's a lot of truth to it, although very few truly elite players make it to FA these days. But yes those that do, never seem to go there. Tavares and the Sharks is a good example of that from a few years back - i seem to remember him strongly considering going there, but ultimately choosing Toronto. I know the Sharks made a big push.

I don't see Marner wanting to play for a guy like Cronin, if it were between the Ducks and Sharks for him, IMO he'd choose SJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM
I think there's a lot of truth to it, although very few truly elite players make it to FA these days. But yes those that do, never seem to go there. Tavares and the Sharks is a good example of that from a few years back - i seem to remember him strongly considering going there, but ultimately choosing Toronto. I know the Sharks made a big push.

I don't see Marner wanting to play for a guy like Cronin, if it were between the Ducks and Sharks for him, IMO he'd choose SJ.

He'd absolutely go to SJ if it was between us and them. He has a budding star to work with there too
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Rogers
He'd absolutely go to SJ if it was between us and them. He has a budding star to work with there too

I disagree. I don't think the Ducks he'd sign with the Ducks regardless, but San Jose is rough. Even with Celebrini, they are going to be bad for awhile. The Ducks are showing real signs of taking the next step and the locker room is reportedly very close. A new coach would go a long way to help, but the Ducks are much closer to contention that the Sharks.
 
I disagree. I don't think the Ducks he'd sign with the Ducks regardless, but San Jose is rough. Even with Celebrini, they are going to be bad for awhile. The Ducks are showing real signs of taking the next step and the locker room is reportedly very close. A new coach would go a long way to help, but the Ducks are much closer to contention that the Sharks.
True. They don't have a LaCombe or a proven Dostal/Gibson duo. They got Askarov but he's raw and inexperienced. Dickinson could play next year but his defense is gonna be really bad as we've seen how Sennecke makes him look bad in the OHL. They still need a few Dmen behind Dickinson, Shakir, Cagnoni, and Thrun. Thrun hasn't improved offensively at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hey234
Just for fun:

1) Offer Sheet Mavrik Bourque @ 4.5 (lose '26 2nd)
2) Trade '26 1st (top 10 protected) + Colangelo/Nesterenko + mid level prospect (Pettersson/Masse/Terrance/etc...) for Vilardi signed 8 x 8.5 mil

Gauthier-Carlssson-Vilardi
Zegras-McTavish-Colangelo/Nesterenko
Vatrano-Bourque-Terry
Killorn-Gaucher-Strome
 
Just for fun:

1) Offer Sheet Mavrik Bourque @ 4.5 (lose '26 2nd)
2) Trade '26 1st (top 10 protected) + Colangelo/Nesterenko + mid level prospect (Pettersson/Masse/Terrance/etc...) for Vilardi signed 8 x 8.5 mil

Gauthier-Carlssson-Vilardi
Zegras-McTavish-Colangelo/Nesterenko
Vatrano-Bourque-Terry
Killorn-Gaucher-Strome
I would much rather take advantage of Dallas' cap situation in the form of taking back cap and getting Bourque with it.

For example, Sequin has 2 more years left at 9.8 mil per but his salary is only 7.8 mil total if we acquire him after July 1st. The Ducks could take him and his full contract with Bourque for free, then deal Sequin a year and a half later for another asset.

Not sure why the Jets would make that trade. They are trying to win now and I dont think they will have a problem signing him if they let Ehlers go. It's a good target though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zegs2sendhelp
I would much rather take advantage of Dallas' cap situation in the form of taking back cap and getting Bourque with it.

For example, Sequin has 2 more years left at 9.8 mil per but his salary is only 7.8 mil total if we acquire him after July 1st. The Ducks could take him and his full contract with Bourque for free, then deal Sequin a year and a half later for another asset.

Not sure why the Jets would make that trade. They are trying to win now and I dont think they will have a problem signing him if they let Ehlers go. It's a good target though.
Seguin has a full NMC (and there’s a chance he LTIRetries anyway). If Dallas is forced to move cap out, it’s going to be someone like Dumba. Maybe Marchment if they get desperate, but that would probably be a last resort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gliff
Seguin has a full NMC (and there’s a chance he LTIRetries anyway). If Dallas is forced to move cap out, it’s going to be someone like Dumba. Maybe Marchment if they get desperate, but that would probably be a last resort.
Ya not 100% saying we should do that exactly, just an example of using our cap space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: All Mighty
I never do these mock trades so feel free to roast me, but just cooked this up.

To NYI:
Strome
Zellweger

To ANA:
Dobson (with assurances he'll sign)

We get an RD to play with LaCombe, free up some space on the LD for a prospect like Solberg (who I think will be more important defensively than Zelly), and free up the 3C for Zegras to run three scoring lines.

Isles get a good prospect in Zellweger and a solid 3C in Strome (their current 3C is Cizikas)
 
I never do these mock trades so feel free to roast me, but just cooked this up.

To NYI:
Strome
Zellweger

To ANA:
Dobson (with assurances he'll sign)

We get an RD to play with LaCombe, free up some space on the LD for a prospect like Solberg (who I think will be more important defensively than Zelly), and free up the 3C for Zegras to run three scoring lines.

Isles get a good prospect in Zellweger and a solid 3C in Strome (their current 3C is Cizikas)
Definitely will need more value going to NYI. Strome is fine, but he shouldn't have much value in a trade like this. The gap between Dobson and Zell is pretty large at the moment.
 
Jackets fan wondering here if the Ducks could be interested in trading one of their LD prospects for Chinakhov? He hasn't played much this year due to back issues, but when healthy he's shown he can play like and has the potential to be a legit two-way top-6 forward.
 
Jackets fan wondering here if the Ducks could be interested in trading one of their LD prospects for Chinakhov? He hasn't played much this year due to back issues, but when healthy he's shown he can play like and has the potential to be a legit two-way top-6 forward.
It’s a common thought that one of Mintyukov/Zellweger will be moved soon. I think the goal would be to trade one of them for an established top 6 player though. Don’t think Chinakhov fits the Ducks needs at the moment.
 
It’s a common thought that one of Mintyukov/Zellweger will be moved soon. I think the goal would be to trade one of them for an established top 6 player though. Don’t think Chinakhov fits the Ducks needs at the moment.
I was actually thinking about guys lower in the depth chart, like Hinds or Solberg. But I get it if Chinakhov isn't the type you need.
 
I was actually thinking about guys lower in the depth chart, like Hinds or Solberg. But I get it if Chinakhov isn't the type you need.
Hinds we would most likely do, not Solberg though. I would be more interested in Chinakhov if he were right handed, but that still doesn’t completely disqualify him for me.

Out of curiosity, would you have interest in a Gibson for Merzlikins+ type of deal? Gibson is most likely getting dealt in the offseason and Columbus is on the short list of teams that could use a goalie upgrade.
 
I was actually thinking about guys lower in the depth chart, like Hinds or Solberg. But I get it if Chinakhov isn't the type you need.
Hinds/zellweger could be moved, think they kinda are odd man out. But I imagine, they’ll be moved as part of a package for a bigger piece.

Solberg is def part of the future, our GM/scouts love him.
 

Ad

Ad