Speculation: 2025 Trade/Free Agency Thread

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
I think I have a pretty good understanding of deferred contracts. It's just a way to mitigate some of the lost extra year. It will affect the cap hit for sure. How much depends on how it's structured and if he's okay with it.

@tomd I don't think there is a high probability he signs here. But I think it odd how so many people seem to KNOW he won't.
Ya until he’s signed, there’s 1-32 chance he could.

No one knows if he will or won’t sign here, all we know is that PV will likely check on him if he does hit UFA

With the young core Anaheim has + prospect depth …. I’d have to imagine Anaheim Is starting to pop up on UFA radar of team that might be pretty competitive throughout a 7 year year contract.
 
I think I have a pretty good understanding of deferred contracts. It's just a way to mitigate some of the lost extra year. It will affect the cap hit for sure. How much depends on how it's structured and if he's okay with it.

@tomd I don't think there is a high probability he signs here. But I think it odd how so many people seem to KNOW he won't.
There is always a chance but the odds are really stacked against it...much lower than 1/32 given free agent history and the player's ties to Toronto specifically and the East Coast in general. I think proposing lineups where Marner is on the top line next year is just a setup for disappointment. If the miracle happens we'll rejoice but I'm not going to give it any thought until then. Much like the Bedard lottery...there are still people who are upset that the miracle didn't happen.
 
Broken record, but priority should be a major upgrade to Killorn’s spot. Issue is. Which big FA will want to play for Cronin? Verbeek should get a more seasoned coach someone with respect around the league, then maybe can get that FA they need.
 
I’m not seeing how Zegras isn’t the odd man out if we were to get Marner somehow. Although, I think you keep him for next year in that case and then trade him for a D later

Guathier-Carlsson-Marner
Zegras-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Colangelo
Killorn-X-Nesterenko

Need a gritty 4th line center who’s actually good at hockey. I don’t trust Gaucher to be that guy next season

I would actually prefer Ehlers to Marner though. Will be cheaper.

Offer Ehlers 6 years @ 10 million AAV
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zegs2sendhelp
There is always a chance but the odds are really stacked against it...much lower than 1/32 given free agent history and the player's ties to Toronto specifically and the East Coast in general. I think proposing lineups where Marner is on the top line next year is just a setup for disappointment. If the miracle happens we'll rejoice but I'm not going to give it any thought until then. Much like the Bedard lottery...there are still people who are upset that the miracle didn't happen.
Are the odds really stacked against it though? Ducks have signed a number of major UFAs. Federov, Neidermayer. There aren't many players of that caliber that actually get to ufa. Given Tor is already his home team and that he hasn't signed and there js history there, a lot of it bad, it generally leads to the idea that he really could leave and if he does that's the 1 team anyone KNOWS he would want to play for given where he grew up. To me if Tor doesn't sign him all bets are off. We really don't know what he'd want from a new team. Does he want the best chance to win now. Does he just want the most money he can get, does he want a smaller market where he's not going to be the scape goat when ever something goes wrong. Maybe that actually doesn't bother him. Does that makes the Ducks a legit destination, no idea. That's PVs job to sell Him on it.
 
Are the odds really stacked against it though? Ducks have signed a number of major UFAs. Federov, Neidermayer. There aren't many players of that caliber that actually get to ufa. Given Tor is already his home team and that he hasn't signed and there js history there, a lot of it bad, it generally leads to the idea that he really could leave and if he does that's the 1 team anyone KNOWS he would want to play for given where he grew up. To me if Tor doesn't sign him all bets are off. We really don't know what he'd want from a new team. Does he want the best chance to win now. Does he just want the most money he can get, does he want a smaller market where he's not going to be the scape goat when ever something goes wrong. Maybe that actually doesn't bother him. Does that makes the Ducks a legit destination, no idea. That's PVs job to sell Him on it.
They really haven’t signed a number of major FAs though. They’ve signed like maybe 3 in their entire franchise history. The rest are either mediocrity or former stars way past their primes or both

This franchise has been around for 33 years now

I would say there’s no question the odds are stacked against us signing any prime aged star player

The state tax and being a bottom feeder the last 8 years make it really really hard. Also I think it might help if we had an experienced reputable coach who players viewed as someone they want to play for but we don’t obviously

It is what it is. Got to draft well
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomd
Are the odds really stacked against it though? Ducks have signed a number of major UFAs. Federov, Neidermayer. There aren't many players of that caliber that actually get to ufa. Given Tor is already his home team and that he hasn't signed and there js history there, a lot of it bad, it generally leads to the idea that he really could leave and if he does that's the 1 team anyone KNOWS he would want to play for given where he grew up. To me if Tor doesn't sign him all bets are off. We really don't know what he'd want from a new team. Does he want the best chance to win now. Does he just want the most money he can get, does he want a smaller market where he's not going to be the scape goat when ever something goes wrong. Maybe that actually doesn't bother him. Does that makes the Ducks a legit destination, no idea. That's PVs job to sell Him on it.
Hope springs eternal and that's fine as long when the Ducks don't/can't sign him you aren't disappointed or angry at Verbeek/ownership. And that is my fear with a fairly large portion of the fanbase here. Realistic expectations are important to happiness. I'll be watching for your reaction when he is finally signed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Duck Knight
Hope springs eternal and that's fine as long when the Ducks don't/can't sign him you aren't disappointed or angry at Verbeek/ownership. And that is my fear with a fairly large portion of the fanbase here. Realistic expectations are important to happiness. I'll be watching for your reaction when he is finally signed.
I've been pretty open about my feelings regarding PV. He might not get Marner but if he fails to add a real top 6 upgrade again I absolutely will be holding him accountable for his lack of results. That's his job. To make this team better. And sitting on his draft picks, imo, is not indicative of a good GM. Accountability doesn't stop at the players.
 
They really haven’t signed a number of major FAs though. They’ve signed like maybe 3 in their entire franchise history. The rest are either mediocrity or former stars way past their primes or both

This franchise has been around for 33 years now

I would say there’s no question the odds are stacked against us signing any prime aged star player

The state tax and being a bottom feeder the last 8 years make it really really hard. Also I think it might help if we had an experienced reputable coach who players viewed as someone they want to play for but we don’t obviously

It is what it is. Got to draft well
I've asked before, but we're talking specific to Marner caliber players here. How many have actually become available? My point being that the pool isn't really that big to begin with so saying the Ducks won't get one isn't really a fair conclusion.
 
Adding a couple of high end 4th liners should be realistic. Who's available? Marchment from Dallas maybe due to cap? Get a C that can win faceoffs and a good coach and Ducks might be a playoff team next year. Realistically, you can go:

McTavish/Gauthier Carlsson Colangelo
McTavish/Gauthier Zegras Vatrano
Killorn Strome Terry
Marchment/FA 4C Gaucher/Nesterenko

I know Killorn won't be dropped any farther down the lineup, but if a coach did he can play 4RW and take a lot of the PK minutes, keep Vatrano with Strome and Terry, and put Nesterenko up IF he can keep playing well. Not an ideal situation, but a realistic one at least.

Next year is another superstar 1st overall pick, i wonder if there'll be another team like Chicago tanking for it and trying to get rid of a young guy like DeBrincat for a high pick.
 
Adding a couple of high end 4th liners should be realistic. Who's available? Marchment from Dallas maybe due to cap? Get a C that can win faceoffs and a good coach and Ducks might be a playoff team next year. Realistically, you can go:

McTavish/Gauthier Carlsson Colangelo
McTavish/Gauthier Zegras Vatrano
Killorn Strome Terry
Marchment/FA 4C Gaucher/Nesterenko

I know Killorn won't be dropped any farther down the lineup, but if a coach did he can play 4RW and take a lot of the PK minutes, keep Vatrano with Strome and Terry, and put Nesterenko up IF he can keep playing well. Not an ideal situation, but a realistic one at least.

Next year is another superstar 1st overall pick, i wonder if there'll be another team like Chicago tanking for it and trying to get rid of a young guy like DeBrincat for a high pick.
Debrincat is on Detroit now
 
I've been pretty open about my feelings regarding PV. He might not get Marner but if he fails to add a real top 6 upgrade again I absolutely will be holding him accountable for his lack of results. That's his job. To make this team better. And sitting on his draft picks, imo, is not indicative of a good GM. Accountability doesn't stop at the players.
I've been critical of Verbeek for certain decisions but I can't blame him for not getting players who have no desire to play in California. I offered a challenge yesterday to provide a list of all the top tier UFA's that have been signed by ANY California team in the last 30-35 years. Someone mentioned Neidermayer. Still waiting for another. Fedorov was well into his 30s when he signed with the Ducks which doesn't really match the age range that Verbeek should be aiming for IMO.

The top tier this year is Marner, Ehlers, Bennett, and Boeser. So mathematically the Ducks have a 1/8 or 12.5% chance of getting one of them. That's a tough bet to take.
 
I’m not seeing how Zegras isn’t the odd man out if we were to get Marner somehow. Although, I think you keep him for next year in that case and then trade him for a D later

Guathier-Carlsson-Marner
Zegras-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Colangelo
Killorn-X-Nesterenko

Need a gritty 4th line center who’s actually good at hockey. I don’t trust Gaucher to be that guy next season

I would actually prefer Ehlers to Marner though. Will be cheaper.

Offer Ehlers 6 years @ 10 million AAV
I’m cool with pretty much any legit top 6 winger ehlers/marners… guys on trade market etc.

Just need someone that can help the powerplay and overall offense.

4th line, I think I’d just want a face off ace tbh…. Gritty would be a nice + but we need someone that can have us start more with the puck than we do.

Mctavish is improved and I’d imagine will be above 50 next year…. But after that we have a lot of bad looking %….
 
I’m not seeing how Zegras isn’t the odd man out if we were to get Marner somehow. Although, I think you keep him for next year in that case and then trade him for a D later

Guathier-Carlsson-Marner
Zegras-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Colangelo
Killorn-X-Nesterenko

Need a gritty 4th line center who’s actually good at hockey. I don’t trust Gaucher to be that guy next season

I would actually prefer Ehlers to Marner though. Will be cheaper.

Offer Ehlers 6 years @ 10 million AAV
The fact we continue to not play Zegras at center to me, could be very telling. He just doesn’t get it done on the wing. Something has to give there
 
PV has to be creative with the contracts. Regarding the taxes. Otherwise FA don't wanna come. We need to start winning more and bring in a likable coach
On the tax issue, which low tax states have teams that are realistic players for Marner? Maybe Seattle or Carolina? Most of the other options - particularly re- signing in Toronto - are high tax states.

I think the bigger issue is the coach and whether the team is perceived to have a good chance of winning. It seems Cronin has a pretty bad reputation with players.


I've been critical of Verbeek for certain decisions but I can't blame him for not getting players who have no desire to play in California. I offered a challenge yesterday to provide a list of all the top tier UFA's that have been signed by ANY California team in the last 30-35 years. Someone mentioned Neidermayer. Still waiting for another. Fedorov was well into his 30s when he signed with the Ducks which doesn't really match the age range that Verbeek should be aiming for IMO.

The top tier this year is Marner, Ehlers, Bennett, and Boeser. So mathematically the Ducks have a 1/8 or 12.5% chance of getting one of them. That's a tough bet to take.

I agree with your sentiment that players need to want to be in California. That being said, to gauge the desirability of playing in California, you need to consider not only UFAs, but also elite players who have re-signed with teams in California in lieu of moving as a UFA. There's a pretty good track record of that.

Ducks had Getz/Perry/Teemu/Nieds/Pronger/lots of others

Sharks had Marleau, Thornton, Karlsson, Burns, and a lot of other core players

Kings - Doughty/Brown/Kopitar and lots of other players.

As noted above, taxes are one factor, but you need to consider what the other options are. Also, I think the better UFA want to go to winning teams. That is probably the biggest obstacle. For example Stamkos and Marchessault wanted to chase cups . . . whereas Killorn (not as elite) was chasing $$ on his final contract.
 
On the tax issue, which low tax states have teams that are realistic players for Marner? Maybe Seattle or Carolina? Most of the other options - particularly re- signing in Toronto - are high tax states.

I think the bigger issue is the coach and whether the team is perceived to have a good chance of winning. It seems Cronin has a pretty bad reputation with players.




I agree with your sentiment that players need to want to be in California. That being said, to gauge the desirability of playing in California, you need to consider not only UFAs, but also elite players who have re-signed with teams in California in lieu of moving as a UFA. There's a pretty good track record of that.

Ducks had Getz/Perry/Teemu/Nieds/Pronger/lots of others

Sharks had Marleau, Thornton, Karlsson, Burns, and a lot of other core players

Kings - Doughty/Brown/Kopitar and lots of other players.

As noted above, taxes are one factor, but you need to consider what the other options are. Also, I think the better UFA want to go to winning teams. That is probably the biggest obstacle. For example Stamkos and Marchessault wanted to chase cups . . . whereas Killorn (not as elite) was chasing $$ on his final contract.
Agree. The best route is to draft them (which is why I place such importance on the draft) and the 2nd best route is to trade for them early in their careers. They tend to stay under those circumstances. By the time a player reaches 28-30 the odds of them wanting to relocate to California drop significantly if history is any guide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Duck Knight
I've been critical of Verbeek for certain decisions but I can't blame him for not getting players who have no desire to play in California. I offered a challenge yesterday to provide a list of all the top tier UFA's that have been signed by ANY California team in the last 30-35 years. Someone mentioned Neidermayer. Still waiting for another. Fedorov was well into his 30s when he signed with the Ducks which doesn't really match the age range that Verbeek should be aiming for IMO.

The top tier this year is Marner, Ehlers, Bennett, and Boeser. So mathematically the Ducks have a 1/8 or 12.5% chance of getting one of them. That's a tough bet to take.
Dany Heatley signing with the Sharks comes to mind. I guess you could make an argument for Kovalchuk coming out of retirement and signing with Kings as well, but that one falls closer to Fedorov than Neidermayer.

Edit - Nevermind Heatley, forgot that was a trade.
 
I’m not hopeful to sign a top tier USA with cap going up so much and supply vs demand and playing for a coach with such a boring offense. If you were marner, ehlers, or bosses why would you come other than money or weather?

I think ekbad might be a worth consideration too, if the goal is get a rh shot for power play.
 

Latest posts

Ad

Ad