Freaky Styley
Registered User
- Aug 14, 2007
- 5,629
- 3,909
Soucy for a 3rd and we paid a 2nd+a 4th+ Parssinen for Lindgren?
Also got him at 50% and Lindgren has a history of playing at least as a Top-4 guy.Soucy for a 3rd and we paid a 2nd+a 4th+ Parssinen for Lindgren?
I don’t believe the Avs would trade Ritchie for a rental. Maybe for an RFA, or someone under contract, but I doubt very much for a pure rental.
It's feeling like they don't know so how are we?Sooooo is NYR buying? Selling? Some weird in between?
Soucy for a 3rd and we paid a 2nd+a 4th+ Parssinen for Lindgren?
I get the cap difference (1M) but it's still quite a difference in acquisition price. I think they could have brought a similar level of play on the bottom pair. Soucy was really good against us when he was on Seattle and has a history playing a top 4 role.Also got him at 50% and Lindgren has a history of playing at least as a Top-4 guy.
Soucy is a bottom pair guy.
I think the Avs look to re-sign Lindgren to a similar price tag, which I think is the justification for the buy price. I don't see term hurting Soucy's value in this situationSoucy sucks now (yeah I know Lindgren does too) and has 1 more year at 3.25
Dumoulin retained for a 2nd seems like a no-brainer over the Lindgren deal IMO. My guess is they want to re-sign Lindgren though which make it make more sense
Soucy for a 3rd and we paid a 2nd+a 4th+ Parssinen for Lindgren?
Haven't watched LAK a ton, but my memory tells me he took quite a few draws, but seemed to be playing more wing during game play. Could just be my lack of knowledge on team systems thoughIs byfield playing center for LA?
He used weird 3 letter acronyms for team last year, and people said they were dumb. So, now he uses them all the time.VCR? Is this what Vancouver is called now or has Elliotte been watching Rock'Em Sock'Em Hockey?
I think we have some scouts that are just very persistent. Won't stop begging for someone until we land them no matter how many years it takesAvs have been linked to Lindgren for a while though.
...It wasn't just Lindgren. Vesey is likely what the 4th was for.
More likely the Parssinen swap and the 4th was for retention....It wasn't just Lindgren. Vesey is likely what the 4th was for.
Soucy for a 3rd and we paid a 2nd+a 4th+ Parssinen for Lindgren?
He's been playing C there yes, and thriving of late. He's shown glimpses before but he's about the breakout in a big way IMO. Been their #1C for the most part recentlyHaven't watched LAK a ton, but my memory tells me he took quite a few draws, but seemed to be playing more wing during game play. Could just be my lack of knowledge on team systems though
Drury is making no sense. Like he's making trades just to make trades.Sooooo is NYR buying? Selling? Some weird in between?
Oh shit it's happening.
Edit* on further investigation, lol. Nevermind.
This guy and Vlasic tormented me in my EHM sim, 11 million and I couldn’t pay anyone to take them
Yeah for Carlo I would understand. I would hate it, but it’s at least a player under contract.Carlo is under contract though and they could re-sign Marchand.
I think the bigger thing preventing Ritchie from being traded, is if they don't trade for a 2C. That would be risky.
Maybe if they're confident they could land one in the off season, but I don't see how they could be confident in UFA's, or trades, if they couldn't trade for one at the deadline.