I still don't think this roster is unsalvageable. Everyone is going to cry about how this guy or that guy was left off and "they left so much superstar skill at home" or whatever...but at the end of the day, a lot of these guys that
are on the team are also "superstars" at this level. And they're playing like junk. There's plenty of "talent" though.
I think it's less a question of roster selection, and more just lineup construction and deployment. Not that this is the "optimal roster" possible per se. But close enough it really shouldn't matter.
And there are bright spots for sure. The team not giving up any even strength goals...at all, is something to build on.
Up front in particular...a few main thoughts:
-Ritchie and Cowan need to be split up. They're both good players (even though Cowan is currently a whipping boy and that giveaway for the EN goal was just...ooooof), but they have less than zero chemistry. It just doesn't work. Ritchie should be centering a "top line", that's fine. But get Cowan away from him and "anchoring" his own line. Cowan wants to play solo heropuck and he can do it to some extent...so let him carry some other "3rd line", kill penalties, etc. It's just too disruptive to be on a "top line" with Ritchie.
-McKenna and Catton can kind of cook. There's clear chemistry there and they look dangerous, so build off of it. Build a "2nd line" around them. Maybe Cataford? Give them a little size, can get to the net, forecheck, work the corners, etc. Would be good to get him involved because he
does have plenty of skill too.
-Howe is so invisible when he plays...honestly just ditch him for Martone. At least there's offensive upside there.
-Luchanko always has so much jump, i wish they'd work him in more regularly. But i don't mind him as that "floater" who comes off the bench hungry, subs in wherever, kills penalties, etc. either.
-The whole roster seems way better configured to just roll "3 lines" and a "4th energy line" rather than trying to stack some sort of actual "Top Line". There's just way too much talent that's more or less on the same level, and not as much of the absolute gamebreaking variety that'd be worth doubling down on like the USA top line. So leverage that depth by just rolling line after line that teams have to contend with in the matchup game.
So to me...the goal should be to spread things across 3 main lines. A framework something like:
XXX - Ritchie - XXX
McKenna - Catton - XXX
Cowan - Yager - XXX
XXX - XXX - XXX
You can plug a lot of players into different spots there, but for me it'd probably like something like:
Rehkopf - Ritchie - Martone
Just give Ritchie a pair of big goal-scoring wingers to work with and let him run. He can do the bulk of the puck carrying...just have them get open and get to the net.
McKenna - Catton - Cataford
These two seem to really have something and look dangerous, but i think a big body who can clean up around the net and create more traffic there would probably help more than anything.
Cowan - Yager - Gauthier
This basically becomes your "go to guys" quasi checking line that can also score. Yager isn't really driving much, and Cowan seems like he's on a bit of a one-man mission out there too often. But Yager can be your defensive anchor, Gauthier can just sorta crash around, forecheck, one-touch the puck to Cowan, whatever. It's a line i think you could play a bunch of minutes and even match against top lines...and Cowan will probably still pot some goals, and maybe even get Yager involved in a supporting context.
Pinelli - Beaudoin - Nadeau
*Luchanko
Basically your "leftovers" to create some sort of responsible "energy line" that you don't have to worry about defensively, but probably shouldn't be playing too much.
At least...that's my somewhat long-winded thinking. I really don't see a big "talent deficit" between this roster and anyone else in the tournament. They just need to rejig a lot of things that aren't working lineup-wise, and stay out of the box.