WJC: 2025 Team Canada Roster Talk

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,336
14,672
Expect the unexpected when it comes to player selections. Cameron can be stubborn when it comes to (not) making tactical changes depending on game situation or, in the context of the OHL, a playoff series. The 67s had Pavel Mintyukov on their 2022-23 roster….now, down 2-1 or 3-1 in a tight playoff series, would you have expected a coach to take the reins off and unleash a d-man that would be a very good NHL regular a few months later? Probably, right? Well, Cameron didn’t. Continued rolling 6 d-men with the same pairings, same conservative play style, no new approach or tactics making use of Mintyukov’s outstanding skill.

I think that’s what we need to watch with Cameron…not so much the player selections, but more a stubbornness and conservative approach that isn’t quick to adapt to changing situations.
I'll be concerned if Canada heads into the gold medal game because I've seen Cameron's sit back in a shell all third period long strategy in action. I also remember from 2022 when Canada lost its third line centre, Greig, and replaced him with McTavish, the team's first line centre who had been torching the tournament. I accept that it will be a conservative team. Cameron probably would have been a much better fit for last year's team that was mediocre in talent and needed structure but Canada has a higher number of horses this year.
 

NordiquesForeva

Registered User
May 30, 2022
879
1,002
I'll be concerned if Canada heads into the gold medal game because I've seen Cameron's sit back in a shell all third period long strategy in action. I also remember from 2022 when Canada lost its third line centre, Greig, and replaced him with McTavish, the team's first line centre who had been torching the tournament. I accept that it will be a conservative team. Cameron probably would have been a much better fit for last year's team that was mediocre in talent and needed structure but Canada has a higher number of horses this year.

I think you’ve nailed it with the last sentence. Honestly, we’ll argue on these boards into mid-January about the player selections if Canada doesn’t win gold, but imo the coaching matters so much more. I don’t think Cameron will f*** up the roster construction, but his track record in big games from a tactical perspective is at the very least mildly concerning. He may have been a non-ideal coaching appointment for this particular talent pool but only time will tell. It’ll be an interesting tournament from that perspective.
 

NordiquesForeva

Registered User
May 30, 2022
879
1,002
M. Misa-Catton-Greentree

Wanting to recreate the productivity of Misa and Catton from Hlinka, I opt to pair those two again. Greentree is rewarded for his strong start and clutch u18 by playing the role of Wetsch on that line, a big body that can win battles and create space

McKenna-Ritchie-Sennecke

Sennecke and Ritchie have familiarity from Oshawa even if they haven’t always played on the same line on there. Ritchie played really well with Celebrini at the U18, so he can handle the sometimes difficult intellectual aspect of playing with a player as talented as McKenna

Rehkopf-Yager-Martone

Rehkopf and Yager played well together last year and were some of the lone bright spots for a team that was starved of offense. They no longer have Celebrini centring them, but a player that Rehkopf is familiar with from Mississauga, Martone, is added to the line to add size and skill. This is a ridiculous secondary scoring line that few teams will have an answer for.

Cowan-Luchanko-Boisvert

Cowan and Luchanko are the closest to what I would call matchup players in this forward group. Boisvert gets the DEI Quota inclusion being the sole Quebec player on this team because he can hit and plays physical and play on the type of matchup line that is useful in a tournament like this. Cataford was bad in the Hlinka I saw him play in, Gauthier is having just an okay season, and Carbonneau doesn’t fit the profile of someone who plays on a line like this

Nadeau

I put a heavy emphasis on chemistry to avoid the issues of last year, so it was a bit hard to find a spot to put Nadeau. Nonetheless, he’s a capable offensive player than can fill in anywhere in the top 9 if a spark is needed

Extra: Iginla, Cristall

Iginla is in tough to make the team on a stacked left side, and Cristall just left such a bad taste in my mouth after his u18 that I would rather forgo his offensive production than have to deal with all the off the puck issues

Molendyk-Yakemchuk

Molendyk is basically a returnee and will log heavy minutes. He provides a safety blanket for Yakemchuk to activate more often as he has in Calgary.

Dickinson-Bonk

Logical pairing because they play on the same brigade in London even if they aren’t always paired together. Dickinson has been the best defenseman in the CHL and brings everything in all aspects, Bonk was just okay last year but has become better with London as time has gone on.

Schaefer-Brunicke

Schaefer’s unbelievable start and Sterling international record earns him a spot. He’s paired with a safety blanket in Brunicke who can give him licence to get forward. Familiarity from the u18s.

Price

Had a good u18 on an otherwise bad defensive group, has many aspects to his game and can be versatile if he needs to fill in throughout the top 6

Extras: Mews, Parekh

Mews is probably closer than most people think because of his connections to Cameron, and he has a good u18 and Hlinka. Parekh is someone that is deemed surplus to requirements, as there already plenty of offensive producers in the group that render his risk-reward style too risky for a stage this big.

Bjarnason
George

George has played well for Canada in the past, and even on a terrible Owen Sound team has decent Numbers. Bjarnason has been one of the best if not the best goaltenders in the whole CHL, and has the profile of a true number 1, the best Canada would have had at this tournament since Carter Hart.

Extra: Ravensbergen

Beats out Ivankovic and will gain valuable experience for next year. Looked solid in the prospects game

I know you have him as a depth pick but Mews doesn’t belong anywhere near this team. He’s been poor defensively in Ottawa and the offensive upside just isn’t worth it. Also, there have been rumours of him chaffing with Cameron and wanting out of Ottawa.

Looking at it from Cameron’s perspective, Ritchie and Sennecke were the main drivers of Oshawa’s best-down of 67s last spring in the 2nd round of the playoffs so not only are they two excellent players with a good pedigree, but Cameron got to see first hand what they can do together. I like them as the foundation of a 2nd line.

Finally, I think Cowan will find himself higher than on the 4th line when the games start to matter…the guy is an absolute buzzsaw.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mathieukferland

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,725
1,891
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
He may have been a non-ideal coaching appointment for this particular talent pool but only time will tell. It’ll be an interesting tournament from that perspective.
Useless to quable about it now and I don’t know how the internal politics at hockey Canada work but someone like Gardiner MacDougall should have been handed the reins to this team. I loved the way his team played in Finland (downhill, lethal in transition, good special teams), Moncton is off to a great start this year, and contrary to many Hockey Canada coaches in the past year, road his best players hard when they needed them. But we will see with Cameron, his teams always play physical but the gold medal game issues do concern me
 
  • Like
Reactions: BadgerBruce

Ad

Ad

Ad