unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,910
- 5,699
would love tuch, wouldn't want to give up what he's worth to get him though
I think one of the goalies could be in play. Both are valuable, but only one will be the future #1.Unless the Kings are getting a bonafide 24-25 year old, no to trading Clarke, Greentree, Conmy and the goalies. I’m also partial to Wooley but not everyone is.
Turcotte I don't see. Two more years at league minimum. Still has plenty of upside if he can keep his head up. Helps the cap.I still think Turcotte is a much likelier trade chip than Clarke. Both have value and potential, but the Kings are trying to upgrade Turcotte's spot, not Clarke's spot.
To be a true trade board proposal you need to work in Byfield to NYR for some bottom 6 guys & a D they're trying to dump.I'll do a trade boards quality trade proposal
To Buffalo: Spence, 2047 7th rounder, 2084 6th rounder, conditional 2nd in 2090
(the conditions are that the Kings must win 64 straight cups and Tuch has to win a grammy)
I think one of the goalies could be in play. Both are valuable, but only one will be the future #1.
exactlyI see Portillo as a stopgap and I wouldn’t trade George or Slukynsky until one has established themselves as a nhl starter.
Agree here. If George and Slukynsky continue to trend up, we could have another Quick-Bernier like tandem.I see Portillo as a stopgap and I wouldn’t trade George or Slukynsky until one has established themselves as a nhl starter.