- Jul 25, 2006
- 32,322
- 31,299
Trade Necas for a 2C, sign MarchandLike…?
UFAs Tavares and Bennett who would never sign here?
Or trade for somebody with the zero assets we have?
Trade Necas for a 2C, sign MarchandLike…?
UFAs Tavares and Bennett who would never sign here?
Or trade for somebody with the zero assets we have?
Trade Necas for a 2C, sign Marchand
I knew you’d agree with meOkay.
You don’t know that
Sunk cost fallacy or not, Nelson is a proven 2C. Has been for years and years. If Bednar can't figure out how to make it work, then that's the guy who needs to go. We don't have the assets to find yet another different 2C.
He’s been going crazy hard at CMac ever since we got eliminated.
Not one word about Bednar. It’s all about CMac and trading Mikko.
He’s been going crazy hard at CMac ever since we got eliminated.
Not one word about Bednar. It’s all about CMac and trading Mikko.
He’s been going crazy hard at CMac ever since we got eliminated.
Not one word about Bednar. It’s all about CMac and trading Mikko.
Absolutely he is. Girard is also something that many teams that are rebuilding are looking for. Wouldn't Chicago like him? They have f*** all, in terms of skill at the backend for an example. Girard is something you really want for your regular season, as your #3 guy.
But have you seen his spinoramas?Chicago is more than fine with dmen. You can keep Girard.
But have you seen his spinoramas?
He’s been going crazy hard at CMac ever since we got eliminated.
Not one word about Bednar. It’s all about CMac and trading Mikko.
The fact that Sakic is keeping Bednar and CMac after another early round exit yet again, having to watch it come at the hands of an elite player they recently traded away speaks volumes regarding his (limited) capability as a shrewd hockey business leader. Frankly he’s lucky that Kroenke’s are essentially absentee landlords, no way this would unfold like this in a major hockey market. Avs being 3rd priority in terms of Denver sports has them flying under the radar when it comes to (in)competence and means more suffering for usI'm right there with him. I was one of MacFarland's louder supporters the past few years, but I'm done. He started Be A GM mode with a roster that was like a 98 overall. If Colorado wins the Cup next year, there's no way the narrative around CMac is anything other than "he made a lot of mistakes along the way but was able to fix them in the end."
That's the best case scenario. The current reality is Colorado has (probably) the worst prospect pool in the NHL, no top-100 picks in the next two drafts, and somehow the 2C spot is still unclear. Meanwhile, Rantanen is putting up a legendary performance for the team that knocked the Avs out. I'm not discouraging anyone from ripping Bednar, but I just don't think that's the core problem here.
Yep and that means we get to keep incompetent mgmtKroenke’s are just satisfied with the Avs winning the cup every 20 years. They know they’ll still fill out the arena and make their money as long as they have exciting players like Nate and Cale who people will continue to pay to watch
Also it’s probably not that easy for Kroenke to let Sakic and CMac go. I mean CMac is Sakic’s guy, if they gonna fire CMac, they have to let Joe go too. Just can’t see that happeningYep and that means we get to keep incompetent mgmt
CMac stuck with Bednar. That's his guy. If the Avs falter next season, both guys have got to be punted.I'm right there with him. I was one of MacFarland's louder supporters the past few years, but I'm done. He started Be A GM mode with a roster that was like a 98 overall. If Colorado wins the Cup next year, there's no way the narrative around CMac is anything other than "he made a lot of mistakes along the way but was able to fix them in the end."
That's the best case scenario. The current reality is Colorado has (probably) the worst prospect pool in the NHL, no top-100 picks in the next two drafts, and somehow the 2C spot is still unclear. Meanwhile, Rantanen is putting up a legendary performance for the team that knocked the Avs out. I'm not discouraging anyone from ripping Bednar, but I just don't think that's the core problem here.
I remember going to games between 2010-2013 when no one showed up, well other then other teams fansKroenke’s are just satisfied with the Avs winning the cup every 20 years. They know they’ll still fill out the arena and make their money as long as they have exciting players like Nate and Cale who people will continue to pay to watch
CMac is stuck with Bednar, Sakic is stuck with CMac, Kroenke’s are stuck with Sakic. It’s a vicious cycleCMac stuck with Bednar. That's his guy. If the Avs falter next season, both guys have got to be punted.
Then again, if the Avs falter next season it's probably rebuild time. MacKinnon will be 31, Landeskog what 33? 34? Makar needing a new mega deal as a pending UFA, Necas needing a new deal. Nichushkin and Lehkonen 31, Toews 33. Not exactly ideal.
CMac stuck with Bednar. That's his guy. If the Avs falter next season, both guys have got to be punted.
Then again, if the Avs falter next season it's probably rebuild time. MacKinnon will be 31, Landeskog what 33? 34? Makar needing a new mega deal as a pending UFA, Necas needing a new deal. Nichushkin and Lehkonen 31, Toews 33. Not exactly ideal.
How much cap space did he inherit? I think people are going a little over the top with the revisionist history and hatred for CMac.I'm right there with him. I was one of MacFarland's louder supporters the past few years, but I'm done. He started Be A GM mode with a roster that was like a 98 overall. If Colorado wins the Cup next year, there's no way the narrative around CMac is anything other than "he made a lot of mistakes along the way but was able to fix them in the end."
That's the best case scenario. The current reality is Colorado has (probably) the worst prospect pool in the NHL, no top-100 picks in the next two drafts, and somehow the 2C spot is still unclear. Meanwhile, Rantanen is putting up a legendary performance for the team that knocked the Avs out. I'm not discouraging anyone from ripping Bednar, but I just don't think that's the core problem here.
He inherited a hell of a lot better cap situation than other GMs like Brisebois and Zito.How much cap space did he inherit? I think people are going a little over the top with the revisionist history and hatred for CMac.