Kuz
Registered User
- May 11, 2015
- 1,030
- 843
Would think NYI keep Dobson, Romanov and Barzal through a rebuild. They are still young enough to play with the younger guys coming up. Holmstom also had a decent season and are quite young. They should be better next year as Barzal only played 30 games this year. Pageau and Lee are UFAs that might get traded for some value if NYI are out of the playoff race.NYI seems to be in no-man’s land roster construction-wise. This could be a golden ticket to kickstart a semi-rebuild.
They have:
Palmieri, 34
Lee, 34
Pageau, 32
Horvat, 30
Barzal, 27
Tsyplakov, 26
Holmstrom, 23
Pulock, 30
Pelech, 30
Dobson, 25
Romanov, 25
Sorokin, 29
They have Cal Ritchie, Cole Eiserman, and now probably Matthew Schaefer as top prospect.
They were bit by the injury-bug this year, but are they good enough short term to not lock intro trading away some pieces that would bring back some nice prospects or picks? Dobson, Romanov and Barzal would bring back a lot. Barzal might even fetch TVR, Milano, Lapierre, Cristall and the 31st OA
And then to build around Schaefer and McKenna![]()
Signing Horvat for that long will probably not age well, but with the cap rising it wont be that bad.
They have some weird contracts aswell. Why sign Duclair for that many years. Hes a decent point producer if you need one for a short time, but there is a reason why he is on his 9th NHL team as a 29 year old. Engvall aswell who is a depth piece. Got a 7 year 3 mill contract. Same with Mayfield who is a 3rd pairing D and is 32 years old is signed for 5 more seasons at 3,5 millions. A good GM would be able to use less on those. You fill those roles with players like that for 1-3 seasons when you miss bodies. If not you risk blocking other younger players to make the team or you cant sign a better player that are cheaper when available. You dont commit long term to them.
Engvall are more like Duhaime, Raddysh or Beauvillier in level. For all three we pay 4,1 mill while they have Engvall at 3,5 mill.